Granatelli Plug wires over 15 rwhp gain??
#582
I took out the original wires and plugs AC 41-952 (the car has only 28000 miles on it) and put in the Granatelli blue wires and NGK TR55IX Iridium plugs.
#584
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
You're the guy with the four foot breaker bar on the plugs! lolz...
I don't think you have the LS7 plug wires there. LS7 wires are red. That explains the resistance difference. HUH, non-LS7 wires have lower resistance.
#585
Your post comes up on my page 13. Computers have different settings....
You're the guy with the four foot breaker bar on the plugs! lolz.
I don't think you have the LS7 plug wires there. LS7 wires are red. That explains the resistance difference. HUH, non-LS7 wires have lower resistance.
http://old.granatellimotorsports.com...ay.php?gid=148
I'm in the process of installing that SLP LS6 manifold with the hole in it that I patched up. I just finished installing an LS6 valley cover. Too bad that I won't be able to reuse the LS1coolant tubes with this valley cover.There just isn't enough room underneath even if I were to grind down the bottom grid. Then it's off to either PSI in Hillsboro OR. or Tommy Wong in Vancouver WA. for a tune. One is about 20 miles away and the other is about 40 miles.
#590
TECH Apprentice
ok not the best comparison....lol
i couldn't be bothered switching leads while on the dyno as they are all custom length and cable tied back from the headers etc etc etc..
last chassis dyno on this dyno i made 446.2rwkw this time i made 461.3rwkw..
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...p-hsv-gto.html
video in the link above and dyno chart.
i couldn't be bothered switching leads while on the dyno as they are all custom length and cable tied back from the headers etc etc etc..
last chassis dyno on this dyno i made 446.2rwkw this time i made 461.3rwkw..
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...p-hsv-gto.html
video in the link above and dyno chart.
#592
TECH Apprentice
Here is what i have to report these are only my opinion and feelings.
i have custom length leads ranging from 430mm in length to 800ish mm in length i first ran this new engine in on MSD wires they were good the ohms on them were from 40ohm to 135ohms depending on the lenth i measured.
I then decided to put my firecore50 wires on the ohms on these wires were very similar to MSD, straight away i noticed crisper throttle repsons and idle seemed better.
Then i installed weapon x spark plugs with granatelli wires.....do not do this they arc out on the heads and cause electrical problems. so then i went with weapon x plugs and firecore50 wires this fixed the problem as the wires took up the extra current.
Then i went back to tr-6 plugs and installed the granatelli wires i straight away noticed the car was easier to drive this is before i had it tuned....and im telling you i noticed this big time as the car was a pig to drive untuned (bucking around all the time not behaving like it should) again throttle response felt even better than firecore50 and it idles very well.
i'll let you guys decide if it made more power im thinking it did i know its a different engine but its the same specs and further to this i have to add on the tuning note which may/may nto help the case for these wires.
the tune in my computer was that set up for the old engine, first pull throttle cable was slack and only opened 66% pulled 398rwkw 2nd pull still on the old basic tune that once before pulled 446.2rwkw it again pulled 446rwkw. then we played with the tune for about 30min and got the 461.3rwkw
I dont know if this means anything but we were able to extract all we could from this engine.
the car als drives really nice here is some videos of it driving in traffic behaving really well.
http://www.facebook.com/Oztracktunin...32221&comments
Last edited by O.N.; 05-13-2011 at 08:49 PM.
#593
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well unfortunately, we prob can't count that as proof of gains, although there's a chance. I am pretty interested in the fact that you say the car is smoother with better throttle response. Between that fact, and the lifetime warranty they have, I may be looking into a set regardless if there's a power gain or not. Thanks for posting your experience with them O.N.! Cheers mate, and good luck with that amazing ride!
#594
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
O.N, I'm curious, what exactly do you mean by "arc out on the heads and cause electrical problems"?
Do you have your coils re-located? Mine are in the stock location, truck coils, GMS wires and the WeaponX plugs. I experienced none of these problems you've described but the car does run "better".
Do you have your coils re-located? Mine are in the stock location, truck coils, GMS wires and the WeaponX plugs. I experienced none of these problems you've described but the car does run "better".
#595
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ga
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So you're basing numbers off of a dyno run from a previous engine? That means absolutely nothing without getting baselines with the current engine and then changing parts. Ever noticed how some newer cars are factory freaks even though they are exactly the same as the other X amount of cars manufactured with them. The smallest of things can make a difference. I'm assuming, hoping really, you didn't have the carbon driveshaft on with either set of pulls(new or old motor) because the difference in rotating mass would effect results as well. So yet again we have butt dyno results but nothing credible
#596
TECH Apprentice
O.N, I'm curious, what exactly do you mean by "arc out on the heads and cause electrical problems"?
Do you have your coils re-located? Mine are in the stock location, truck coils, GMS wires and the WeaponX plugs. I experienced none of these problems you've described but the car does run "better".
Do you have your coils re-located? Mine are in the stock location, truck coils, GMS wires and the WeaponX plugs. I experienced none of these problems you've described but the car does run "better".
So you're basing numbers off of a dyno run from a previous engine? That means absolutely nothing without getting baselines with the current engine and then changing parts. Ever noticed how some newer cars are factory freaks even though they are exactly the same as the other X amount of cars manufactured with them. The smallest of things can make a difference. I'm assuming, hoping really, you didn't have the carbon driveshaft on with either set of pulls(new or old motor) because the difference in rotating mass would effect results as well. So yet again we have butt dyno results but nothing credible
#597
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
I still dont get what's being bashed here.
Maybe they don't make ANY gains on the dyno.... (Insert the opening line of Metallica's cover to So What here)
1. They give a lifetime guarantee
2. They Ohm lower than MSD's, which we all use.
Did I miss something? Lifetime Guarantee. Maybe it doesnt add any HP, maybe it adds one. All I care is that they can't burn and ohm next to nothing, and are guaranteed for life.
Maybe they don't make ANY gains on the dyno.... (Insert the opening line of Metallica's cover to So What here)
1. They give a lifetime guarantee
2. They Ohm lower than MSD's, which we all use.
Did I miss something? Lifetime Guarantee. Maybe it doesnt add any HP, maybe it adds one. All I care is that they can't burn and ohm next to nothing, and are guaranteed for life.
#600
TECH Apprentice