Mac vs. Pacesetters
its not like the mids will make your car pass emmissions
I got MAC mids because at the time, the only other option was $1300 FLP's and no thanks. Plus, from all the LT's i've installed, my MACs fit 10,000x better and looking at the dyno graphs of people that switched from MACs to LTs, it's not worth it to me for such a small gain.
That being said, if you have nothing now and you can get a good price on LTs, get them but if you want a great budget header, get the MACs. I've seen MAC headers with Y pipe sell here for under $200 shipped. I highly doubt you'll find a better deal for LT's with a Y pipe.

I got MAC mids because at the time, the only other option was $1300 FLP's and no thanks. Plus, from all the LT's i've installed, my MACs fit 10,000x better and looking at the dyno graphs of people that switched from MACs to LTs, it's not worth it to me for such a small gain.
That being said, if you have nothing now and you can get a good price on LTs, get them but if you want a great budget header, get the MACs. I've seen MAC headers with Y pipe sell here for under $200 shipped. I highly doubt you'll find a better deal for LT's with a Y pipe.

Its not a 'Mac hater's ball', we are simply stating the facts. Back when you got your macs you had good reason to, I wouldn't spend $1300 on headers either. But now days, there is absolutely no reason not to get long tubes and do it right the first time. And a great budget header would be pacesetters, not macs, unless your going turbo or don't care about power and only want a better sound on your slammed to the ground f-body...
Just browse the for sale section, you'll see MAC headers there for sale all day long for around $200 with a Y pipe.
Just browse the for sale section, you'll see MAC headers there for sale all day long for around $200 with a Y pipe.
don't look at it as the horsepower, look at it as the percentage you're getting. if a catback is worth 10 horsepower on a stock car, but the flowmaster only nets you 3 horsepower, don't look at it as "well, it's ONLY 7 horsepower". no, you've lost SEVENTY PERCENT of the possible horsepower! that's HUGE. that is a big, big 7 horsepower. the reason why you have to look at it like this is because that power loss will increase exponentially. yea, macs are a 5-10 horsepower loss on a stock car, but add an agressive heads and cam package and you're in the hole 20-30 horsepower and you've lost half a second off your ET thanks to the macs. when you look at it like this, macs deserve to be sold for $200.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I like the fitment better, I prefer the prices and i'm willing to sacrifice that 5-10HP for it. IMHO, I still say my car didn't do too dam bad for hitting 399RWHP through a PT4000 converter and said "crappy" MAC headers.

How do you figure that? Just browse the for sale section, you'll see MAC headers there for sale all day long for around $200 with a Y pipe.
I have already pointed out that I feel you made the right decision to go with macs back when the only other option was $1300 flp's....so what are you trying to argue?
Mids don't perform as good, don't sound as good, and now days are pretty much worthless compared to long tubes, that is why they sell for $200 shipped.
With all the options f-body owners have today, why in the hell would you recommend mac mids? Because their cheaper? Thats retarded, of course their cheaper, they aren't the same product as lt's. Thats like saying get a v6 instead of a v8 because its cheaper. Of course its cheaper!!
A situation where you could recommend something b/c its cheaper and still have a valid argument would be if we were comparing 'Kooks LT's vs. Pacesetter LT's'. At least this comparison involves similar products, in that they're both LT's...
either gut your cats and leave everything else alone or get longtubes. end of story.
That's just wrong. Sounds like John Kerry.
IBTL, ...
I have already pointed out that I feel you made the right decision to go with macs back when the only other option was $1300 flp's....so what are you trying to argue?
Mids don't perform as good, don't sound as good, and now days are pretty much worthless compared to long tubes, that is why they sell for $200 shipped.
With all the options f-body owners have today, why in the hell would you recommend mac mids? Because their cheaper? Thats retarded, of course their cheaper, they aren't the same product as lt's. Thats like saying get a v6 instead of a v8 because its cheaper. Of course its cheaper!!
A situation where you could recommend something b/c its cheaper and still have a valid argument would be if we were comparing 'Kooks LT's vs. Pacesetter LT's'. At least this comparison involves similar products, in that they're both LT's...
If you want to save some $, have good fitment and you are willing to sacrifice a few HP for it then YES MACS ARE WORTHWILE. I NEVER once said they are the best and most power making header out there. I'm just tired of people treating them with the same respect that stock manifolds get by MOST people who have never even used a set.
At one time I considered pulling my MACs for a set of pacesetters or flowtechs. After installing quite a few sets of LTs, seeing how poorly they fit and how crappy the Y pipe setup is, I passed. I KNOW I'm giving up 5-10hp but I like the fit and 399 to the wheels ain't too dam shabby with a cam/bolt-ons car WITHOUT LT's through stock untouched heads and a PT4000 converter.
Just to refresh:
Besides, when you start putting that much money into a car for MAX effort, I KNOW macs aren't an option and frankly you'd be nuts to even consider putting $200 headers on a car with that much $ poured into it.







