Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

True Duals Cost POWER!?!?!??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 04:21 PM
  #81  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

Camaro kid you really should stop posting. Each new post make you look less intelligent than the one before it. Quite a feat, 13 posts in a row.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #82  
Asmodeus's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 1
From: Naperville, IL
Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
A Y-merge CANNOT outscavenge an X-merge. It's a DESIGN FLAW. It doesn't matter how nice the bends in the pipes are. It doesn't matter what mufflers you use. Cutout placement won't matter. Quality of the pipe will not matter. The Y-merge ITSELF is the bottleneck here. This is why a Y-pipe setup can NEVER achieve what TD's can in the equal case.
I guess all I can say to you is "stay in school". A 90 degree X with 3inch pipes is not going to outflow a dual 3inch inlet parallel merge Y with a 4 inch outlet.


Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
We're talking about the ideal case, here. Not the case where the y-pipe setup is beautiful and the X-pipe setup is a slapped-together piece of ****.
No, we're talking about every setup, because you said "in all cases". Here.. to refresh your memory..

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
No, the TD's outperform in EVERY CASE. If you take a muffler that flows the same CFM, total pipe diameter that flows the same, cats that flow the same, etc...the X-pipe TD's will ALWAYS outperform the y-pipe because the X-merge scavenges better.
All I have to do is take an extreme example from 1 end and an extreme example from the other end, propose the arguement, and you're statement is wrong.

Last edited by Asmodeus; Feb 29, 2008 at 04:35 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #83  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by SSCAMAROKID
Because I'm kinda shy about my mods

Your just dying to know my mods aren't you. Its just killing you inside. I'll bet it'll keep you up all night tonight.......wondering.....LOL

Gotta love the internet......
Highly doubtful ill lose sleep over the internet.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #84  
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
Tech Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by SSCAMAROKID
Ummmmm.....no. More flow generally means more power up to a point.



Ummmmm. I think thats what they been trying to beat into your thick skull. Glad to see you finally "get it".


Wow. Glad to see you've missed every post I've made this entire thread. You didn't even read my last one it seems. If you did, it went over your head
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #85  
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
Tech Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by Asmodeus
I guess all I can say to you is "stay in school". A 90 degree X with 3inch pipes is not going to outflow a dual 3inch inlet parallel merge Y with a 4 inch outlet.




No, we're talking about every setup, because you said "in all cases". Here.. to refresh your memory..



All I have to do is take an extreme example from 1 end and an extreme example from the other end, propose the arguement, and you're statement is wrong.
Yes, in every case where conditions are equal. You KNOW I meant that. You KNOW it was implied. You're just so desperate to take back what you said because you know you're wrong, you're trying to twist my words and make it sound like I said something I didn't.

Again, a Y-pipe setup CANNOT outperform the equal X-pipe setup. The limit is the merge.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #86  
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
Tech Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by 3.4camaro
Camaro kid you really should stop posting. Each new post make you look less intelligent than the one before it. Quite a feat, 13 posts in a row.


At least you get it.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:16 PM
  #87  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by SSCAMAROKID
Why not have the ***** to tell me what your car will run? I'm curious also..
Mid 11's
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:17 PM
  #88  
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
Tech Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 3
From: Philly
Default

Originally Posted by Galen
Ummmmm, don't think so. Simple fluid dynamics will tell you that splitting a pipe after the merge as an x-pipe does will cause turbulance...hence reduced flow. Couple that with the crappy crossover that most people use around here will just exacerbate the problem. Try again.
So, by your logic, crossovers don't work since all they do is cause turbulence? You know what causes a lot of turbulence? Taking two pipes and smashing them together at 120* angles and jamming the flow into one straight pipe. It's called a y-merge, and the turbulence is why y-pipe setups tend to be a lot raspier than X-pipe setups.

Originally Posted by Galen
To even suggest that you know more that PatrickG is just plain ludicrous. Add a 150 shot to your car and you still won't have the RWHP he is putting out. I would put my money on his is more streetable also. Hell, PatrickG has **** turds with more automotive knowledge than you.

Have a nice day.

Galen
To even suggest that because one guy on all of tech has a really nice y-pipe setup negates the entire sport of racing is the only thing that's plain ludicrous. If PatrickG cut his y-pipe setup off and put on an equally well-made X-pipe setup, he WOULD gain power. If you understood fluid dynamics and understood the superiority of the X-merge vs. the y-merge, you'd agree with me

Gave a nice day.

There's a lot of people out there with fast cars that don't know anything about them. They're called rich people Having a fast car doesn't make you a genius. PatrickG obviously knows what he's talking about, but he should agree that putting an equally well-made X-pipe setup on his car would increase overall output. He just probably doesn't want to do it because of ground clearance and fitment issues.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

 Brett Foote
story-1

Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-8

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-9

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #89  
SSCAMAROKID's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
Mid 11's
Gotcha beat, very low 11's, 3750 race weight, all motor. Do the math and you can probably figure out what I have.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #90  
SSCAMAROKID's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
Mid 11's
By the way there are all motor H/C doing mid 11's. Hell, there are cam only cars going that fast. Are you really sure you know what you are doing?
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:51 PM
  #91  
Galen's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
So, by your logic, crossovers don't work since all they do is cause turbulence? You know what causes a lot of turbulence? Taking two pipes and smashing them together at 120* angles and jamming the flow into one straight pipe. It's called a y-merge, and the turbulence is why y-pipe setups tend to be a lot raspier than X-pipe setups.


To even suggest that because one guy on all of tech has a really nice y-pipe setup negates the entire sport of racing is the only thing that's plain ludicrous. If PatrickG cut his y-pipe setup off and put on an equally well-made X-pipe setup, he WOULD gain power. If you understood fluid dynamics and understood the superiority of the X-merge vs. the y-merge, you'd agree with me

Gave a nice day.

There's a lot of people out there with fast cars that don't know anything about them. They're called rich people Having a fast car doesn't make you a genius. PatrickG obviously knows what he's talking about, but he should agree that putting an equally well-made X-pipe setup on his car would increase overall output. He just probably doesn't want to do it because of ground clearance and fitment issues.
Nice edit there. Actually, if you had actually taken the time to read his post, you would also have seen a picture of what a properly made x-pipe would look like. Simple fact is I have yet to see one used on this forum. That leaves you comparing a generic crappy crossover to a well designed y that will fit within the constraints of an Fbody.

Now, about fluid dynamics...and yes, any gas is considered a fluid and behaves as such. Please explain the logic behind having two pipes going into a single pipe using equally designed merges and then deciding to split them into two pipes again and not disrupt flow. This is exactly what an x-pipe does. Also, the area of the pipe does not dictate flow, as the boundary layer along the walls of the tube generally disrupt flow. Hence, a single pipe will flow more per square inch than two pipes with the half the area each.

The reality is, PatrickG has the money and resources to use the best system he could get. If you read his build, he cut absolutely no corners to reach his goal. He put more research and thought into his exhaust system than just about anyone on this forum. To make a blanket statement about how he could gain power is arrogant at best. By the way, that test is with his cutout open. If I remember right, he lost 7 or so horsepower going through the 3 inch SLP dual/dual muffler. No, I didn't go back to read the post to find out precisely.

Oh yea, my system is a homemade y-pipe going into a 2x3inch Flowmaster merge to one 3.5 inch pipe to a 3.5 inch QTP electric cutout to a 3.5 inch to 3 inch Flowmaster reducer into a Hooker catback. It is tame when I want it to be and I have maximum flow at the flip of a switch. While not as nice as PatrickG's, I feel it will hang with any true dual system out there and is very streetable.

Once again, have a nice day!

Galen

Last edited by Galen; Feb 29, 2008 at 06:08 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #92  
Asmodeus's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 1
From: Naperville, IL
Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
Yes, in every case where conditions are equal. You KNOW I meant that. You KNOW it was implied. You're just so desperate to take back what you said because you know you're wrong, you're trying to twist my words and make it sound like I said something I didn't.

Again, a Y-pipe setup CANNOT outperform the equal X-pipe setup. The limit is the merge.
I'm not desperate to take back anything I said. I stand behind every word. You're the one changing your arguement by adding the word "equal" into it.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:56 PM
  #93  
SSCAMAROKID's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
So, by your logic, crossovers don't work since all they do is cause turbulence? You know what causes a lot of turbulence? Taking two pipes and smashing them together at 120* angles and jamming the flow into one straight pipe. It's called a y-merge, and the turbulence is why y-pipe setups tend to be a lot raspier than X-pipe setups.


To even suggest that because one guy on all of tech has a really nice y-pipe setup negates the entire sport of racing is the only thing that's plain ludicrous. If PatrickG cut his y-pipe setup off and put on an equally well-made X-pipe setup, he WOULD gain power. If you understood fluid dynamics and understood the superiority of the X-merge vs. the y-merge, you'd agree with me

Gave a nice day.

There's a lot of people out there with fast cars that don't know anything about them. They're called rich people Having a fast car doesn't make you a genius. PatrickG obviously knows what he's talking about, but he should agree that putting an equally well-made X-pipe setup on his car would increase overall output. He just probably doesn't want to do it because of ground clearance and fitment issues.
Obviously, you are neither fast, rich, or smart. You truley don't understand what you are talking about. A y-pipe can be made to equal the performance of an x-pipe if done correctly. Thats the bottom line here. Its all about sound preference and alot of people in this thread agree. And I think that if Patrick thought that the x-pipe would have made more power he would have used it, dontcha think? duh?
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #94  
Asmodeus's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 1
From: Naperville, IL
Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
So, by your logic, crossovers don't work since all they do is cause turbulence? You know what causes a lot of turbulence? Taking two pipes and smashing them together at 120* angles and jamming the flow into one straight pipe. It's called a y-merge, and the turbulence is why y-pipe setups tend to be a lot raspier than X-pipe setups.
ahh.. but a parellel merge isn't 120 degrees and doesn't create turbulence.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 05:58 PM
  #95  
SSCAMAROKID's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Galen
Now, about fluid dynamics...and yes, any gas is considered a fluid and behaves as such.
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #96  
MeentSS02's Avatar
Kleeborp the Moderator™
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,316
Likes: 6
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Originally Posted by SSCAMAROKID
Obviously, you are neither fast, rich, or smart. You truley don't understand what you are talking about. A y-pipe can be made to equal the performance of an x-pipe if done correctly. Thats the bottom line here. Its all about sound preference and alot of people in this thread agree. And I think that if Patrick thought that the x-pipe would have made more power he would have used it, dontcha think? duh?
Everyone keeps referring back to Patricks final decision on his exhaust, but I have a feeling that that was more driven by the F-body's design rather than all out performance. Most people don't want to pay what it costs to run a nice over the axle dual exhaust setup on these cars. I have around $1600 or so tied up in mine...

You can't look at his decision and say it was without a doubt the best one he could have made from a power production standpoint. He would have had to run a dual exhaust at some point to let that serve as a basis for comparison, and to my knowledge, he never did.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 06:30 PM
  #97  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by SSCAMAROKID
Gotcha beat, very low 11's, 3750 race weight, all motor. Do the math and you can probably figure out what I have.
Now I know youre a retard if you believe that my H/C N2O car runs mid 11's. But I guess you got me beat.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #98  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by SSCAMAROKID
And I think that if Patrick thought that the x-pipe would have made more power he would have used it, dontcha think? duh?
Why dont you just ask Pat G yourself?
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 06:36 PM
  #99  
Galen's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MeentSS02
Everyone keeps referring back to Patricks final decision on his exhaust, but I have a feeling that that was more driven by the F-body's design rather than all out performance. Most people don't want to pay what it costs to run a nice over the axle dual exhaust setup on these cars. I have around $1600 or so tied up in mine...

You can't look at his decision and say it was without a doubt the best one he could have made from a power production standpoint. He would have had to run a dual exhaust at some point to let that serve as a basis for comparison, and to my knowledge, he never did.

With this point I will agree. To actually end this debate would require the budget the size of GM. I am really not that worried about which is better...just hate it when we have people on the forum who speak out of their *** about something they either know nothing about or worse think they do and are just too stupid to know it. Looking at the situation realistically, both can be made to perform so close to each other as to nullify the gains. What it really comes down to is sound and how much time and money someone is willing to put into an exhaust system.

Galen

Oh, and I am pretty sure Patrick does have quite a bit of money tied up in his exhaust, unless he is good friends with LG who made his merge and I ***-u-me made the rest of his y-pipe. I am pretty sure that if he thought he could have gained more than a couple of horsepower with a different exhaust, he would have gone a different route.

Last edited by Galen; Feb 29, 2008 at 06:48 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 29, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #100  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Galen
just hate it when we have people on the forum who speak out of their *** about something they either know nothing about or worse think they do and are just too stupid to know it.
x2
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.

story-0
6 Gifts Neither Your Dad Nor Grad Will Shove Into the 'Trinket Drawer'

Don't get dad new socks or a grill brush this year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-04 18:13:20


VIEW MORE
story-1
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?

Slideshow: We take a close look at the ONE and Artidiag 800BT2 diagnostic tools from Topdon and the reasons to buy one over the other.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 11:05:11


VIEW MORE
story-2
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine

Slideshow: The controversial Ferrari F6 swaps its original flat-12 for a Corvette Z06-derived LT4 V8 and sends power to four rear wheels through a custom-built drivetrain.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 18:23:54


VIEW MORE
story-3
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built

Slideshow:These GM engines didn't just make huge power, they survived abuse, boost, track days, and six-digit mileage with a reputation for refusing to quit.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-21 16:45:27


VIEW MORE
story-4
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-6
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-9
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE