True Duals Cost POWER!?!?!??
All I have to do is take an extreme example from 1 end and an extreme example from the other end, propose the arguement, and you're statement is wrong.
Last edited by Asmodeus; Feb 29, 2008 at 04:35 PM.

Wow. Glad to see you've missed every post I've made this entire thread. You didn't even read my last one it seems. If you did, it went over your head
No, we're talking about every setup, because you said "in all cases". Here.. to refresh your memory..
All I have to do is take an extreme example from 1 end and an extreme example from the other end, propose the arguement, and you're statement is wrong.
Again, a Y-pipe setup CANNOT outperform the equal X-pipe setup. The limit is the merge.
Have a nice day.
Galen

Gave a nice day.
There's a lot of people out there with fast cars that don't know anything about them. They're called rich people
Having a fast car doesn't make you a genius. PatrickG obviously knows what he's talking about, but he should agree that putting an equally well-made X-pipe setup on his car would increase overall output. He just probably doesn't want to do it because of ground clearance and fitment issues. The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
To even suggest that because one guy on all of tech has a really nice y-pipe setup negates the entire sport of racing is the only thing that's plain ludicrous. If PatrickG cut his y-pipe setup off and put on an equally well-made X-pipe setup, he WOULD gain power. If you understood fluid dynamics and understood the superiority of the X-merge vs. the y-merge, you'd agree with me

Gave a nice day.
There's a lot of people out there with fast cars that don't know anything about them. They're called rich people
Having a fast car doesn't make you a genius. PatrickG obviously knows what he's talking about, but he should agree that putting an equally well-made X-pipe setup on his car would increase overall output. He just probably doesn't want to do it because of ground clearance and fitment issues.Now, about fluid dynamics...and yes, any gas is considered a fluid and behaves as such. Please explain the logic behind having two pipes going into a single pipe using equally designed merges and then deciding to split them into two pipes again and not disrupt flow. This is exactly what an x-pipe does. Also, the area of the pipe does not dictate flow, as the boundary layer along the walls of the tube generally disrupt flow. Hence, a single pipe will flow more per square inch than two pipes with the half the area each.
The reality is, PatrickG has the money and resources to use the best system he could get. If you read his build, he cut absolutely no corners to reach his goal. He put more research and thought into his exhaust system than just about anyone on this forum. To make a blanket statement about how he could gain power is arrogant at best. By the way, that test is with his cutout open. If I remember right, he lost 7 or so horsepower going through the 3 inch SLP dual/dual muffler. No, I didn't go back to read the post to find out precisely.
Oh yea, my system is a homemade y-pipe going into a 2x3inch Flowmaster merge to one 3.5 inch pipe to a 3.5 inch QTP electric cutout to a 3.5 inch to 3 inch Flowmaster reducer into a Hooker catback. It is tame when I want it to be and I have maximum flow at the flip of a switch. While not as nice as PatrickG's, I feel it will hang with any true dual system out there and is very streetable.
Once again, have a nice day!
Galen
Last edited by Galen; Feb 29, 2008 at 06:08 PM.
Again, a Y-pipe setup CANNOT outperform the equal X-pipe setup. The limit is the merge.
To even suggest that because one guy on all of tech has a really nice y-pipe setup negates the entire sport of racing is the only thing that's plain ludicrous. If PatrickG cut his y-pipe setup off and put on an equally well-made X-pipe setup, he WOULD gain power. If you understood fluid dynamics and understood the superiority of the X-merge vs. the y-merge, you'd agree with me

Gave a nice day.
There's a lot of people out there with fast cars that don't know anything about them. They're called rich people
Having a fast car doesn't make you a genius. PatrickG obviously knows what he's talking about, but he should agree that putting an equally well-made X-pipe setup on his car would increase overall output. He just probably doesn't want to do it because of ground clearance and fitment issues.You can't look at his decision and say it was without a doubt the best one he could have made from a power production standpoint. He would have had to run a dual exhaust at some point to let that serve as a basis for comparison, and to my knowledge, he never did.
You can't look at his decision and say it was without a doubt the best one he could have made from a power production standpoint. He would have had to run a dual exhaust at some point to let that serve as a basis for comparison, and to my knowledge, he never did.
With this point I will agree. To actually end this debate would require the budget the size of GM. I am really not that worried about which is better...just hate it when we have people on the forum who speak out of their *** about something they either know nothing about or worse think they do and are just too stupid to know it. Looking at the situation realistically, both can be made to perform so close to each other as to nullify the gains. What it really comes down to is sound and how much time and money someone is willing to put into an exhaust system.
Galen
Oh, and I am pretty sure Patrick does have quite a bit of money tied up in his exhaust, unless he is good friends with LG who made his merge and I ***-u-me made the rest of his y-pipe. I am pretty sure that if he thought he could have gained more than a couple of horsepower with a different exhaust, he would have gone a different route.
Last edited by Galen; Feb 29, 2008 at 06:48 PM.



