New dyno #'s after Fast92 install!!
#121
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i have a heads cam car that went 11.89 @ 118 & 1.88 60' with a ls6 intake & dyno tune on new nitto dr. & stock suspension.......
we put on a fast 92-92,bmr suspension,new et streets & went 11.08 @ 121 & 1.48 60' untuned ............
now lets brake it down sum what.......
11.89 - 11.08 = 8.1 tenth faster in the 1/4 with the fast 92,et streets & bmr...so were does the credit go???????
the bmr suspension & et streets over the stock suspension & nitto are an easy comparison in 60' 1.88 - 1.48 = 4/10s of a second faster in the 1/4
so that leaves us with 4.1 tenth & 3 mph faster for the fast 92/92 setup over the ls6 intake??????????
is my thinking flawed????????![Chug! Chug! Chug!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_chug.gif)
we put on a fast 92-92,bmr suspension,new et streets & went 11.08 @ 121 & 1.48 60' untuned ............
now lets brake it down sum what.......
11.89 - 11.08 = 8.1 tenth faster in the 1/4 with the fast 92,et streets & bmr...so were does the credit go???????
the bmr suspension & et streets over the stock suspension & nitto are an easy comparison in 60' 1.88 - 1.48 = 4/10s of a second faster in the 1/4
so that leaves us with 4.1 tenth & 3 mph faster for the fast 92/92 setup over the ls6 intake??????????
is my thinking flawed????????
![Chug! Chug! Chug!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_chug.gif)
#122
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ft. Bragg, NC
Posts: 2,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i have a heads cam car that went 11.89 @ 118 & 1.88 60' with a ls6 intake & dyno tune on new nitto dr. & stock suspension.......
we put on a fast 92-92,bmr suspension,new et streets & went 11.08 @ 121 & 1.48 60' untuned ............
now lets brake it down sum what.......
11.89 - 11.08 = 8.1 tenth faster in the 1/4 with the fast 92,et streets & bmr...so were does the credit go???????
the bmr suspension & et streets over the stock suspension & nitto are an easy comparison in 60' 1.88 - 1.48 = 4/10s of a second faster in the 1/4
so that leaves us with 4.1 tenth & 3 mph faster for the fast 92/92 setup over the ls6 intake??????????
is my thinking flawed????????![Chug! Chug! Chug!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_chug.gif)
we put on a fast 92-92,bmr suspension,new et streets & went 11.08 @ 121 & 1.48 60' untuned ............
now lets brake it down sum what.......
11.89 - 11.08 = 8.1 tenth faster in the 1/4 with the fast 92,et streets & bmr...so were does the credit go???????
the bmr suspension & et streets over the stock suspension & nitto are an easy comparison in 60' 1.88 - 1.48 = 4/10s of a second faster in the 1/4
so that leaves us with 4.1 tenth & 3 mph faster for the fast 92/92 setup over the ls6 intake??????????
is my thinking flawed????????
![Chug! Chug! Chug!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_chug.gif)
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
did you honestly think you were gonna come below or equal to your previous runs with the additions of those mods?
#123
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: south point,OH
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
not very well broken down at all really, do a search and school yourselfs on how much a tenth off your 60' picks you up ET wise. very few cars ever(not saying it dont happen, but rarely) only pick up a 1/1 ratio. 1.5-2 tenths in the 1/4 are very common from every 1 tenth off your 60'. if you cant get it out the hole, you cant et for ****. get the short times down and a not so powerful car can become a very quick ET car.
#125
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (67)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
not very well broken down at all really, do a search and school yourselfs on how much a tenth off your 60' picks you up ET wise. very few cars ever(not saying it dont happen, but rarely) only pick up a 1/1 ratio. 1.5-2 tenths in the 1/4 are very common from every 1 tenth off your 60'. if you cant get it out the hole, you cant et for ****. get the short times down and a not so powerful car can become a very quick ET car.
i knew there was something like that out there,
so brake it down for me.....i gained 8.1 tenth & went from 1.88 to 1.48 60', thats 4 tenths there, were & HOW did i gain the other 4.1 tenths & 3 mph?
let me know what you come up with,if the fast does not deserve the credit i do not want to give it to it
![Chug! Chug! Chug!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_chug.gif)
#126
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would only credit the fast for about .3 and only due to the 3mph pick up (3mph at your ET is typically .2 to .3 in ET) I would credit your 60' for the other .5 or so you gained. The rumor is every .1 you cut on your 60' is .15 - .2 off you ET. Now, I don't believe that. With my truck, every .1 I cut off my ET equated out closer to .12 - .125 keeping the same mph. Every vehicle is different and only back to back tests for that vehicle will give you solid answers.
#127
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (67)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would only credit the fast for about .3 and only due to the 3mph pick up (3mph at your ET is typically .2 to .3 in ET) I would credit your 60' for the other .5 or so you gained. The rumor is every .1 you cut on your 60' is .15 - .2 off you ET. Now, I don't believe that. With my truck, every .1 I cut off my ET equated out closer to .12 - .125 keeping the same mph. Every vehicle is different and only back to back tests for that vehicle will give you solid answers.
#128
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: south point,OH
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would only credit the fast for about .3 and only due to the 3mph pick up (3mph at your ET is typically .2 to .3 in ET) I would credit your 60' for the other .5 or so you gained. The rumor is every .1 you cut on your 60' is .15 - .2 off you ET. Now, I don't believe that. With my truck, every .1 I cut off my ET equated out closer to .12 - .125 keeping the same mph. Every vehicle is different and only back to back tests for that vehicle will give you solid answers.
#130
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ok I couldn't stay out of this one. No ones claiming that the LS6 intake is superior to the LSX. Look at it from this point of view.
LS6 intake $550 (new not used). 10 RWHP gain over LS1.
That's $55 for each RWHP.
FAST 90/90mm tb $1200. 18 RWHP gain. That's $66.66 for each RWHP.
Bang for the buck the LS6 is a better value.
Now everyone's car is different and will net different gains some a little more some a little less. And what everyones expectations of their car is different. If your going to go with a big cam and heads, then hell yea if you have the money buy the LSX hands down. But if your gonna stay smaller cam NO heads or just bolt ons the LS6 will do just fine. It's been proven time and time again, that's why fast even made the 78mm to compete with the LS6, just was a little too pricey. Everyones setup is different, if everyone had the same old mods well than this would be a pretty boring forum.
LS6 intake $550 (new not used). 10 RWHP gain over LS1.
That's $55 for each RWHP.
FAST 90/90mm tb $1200. 18 RWHP gain. That's $66.66 for each RWHP.
Bang for the buck the LS6 is a better value.
Now everyone's car is different and will net different gains some a little more some a little less. And what everyones expectations of their car is different. If your going to go with a big cam and heads, then hell yea if you have the money buy the LSX hands down. But if your gonna stay smaller cam NO heads or just bolt ons the LS6 will do just fine. It's been proven time and time again, that's why fast even made the 78mm to compete with the LS6, just was a little too pricey. Everyones setup is different, if everyone had the same old mods well than this would be a pretty boring forum.
![Engarde](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies3/engarde.gif)
#131
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: south point,OH
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yeah it might be, i bet its still alittle on the heavy side. i trap 92-93 in the 1/8 and about 119 in the 1/4. tho i hardly ever get to run 1/4 since the closest one is almost 3hrs from here and i have to pass two nicer 1/8th miles to get there.lol
#133
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: south point,OH
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yeah, thats NA. it mph's hard on the bottle but always breaks somethin,lol (tq arm, posi's,driveshafts,axle's,clutch and bell housing right now.lol)
boy we sure have whored this thread all to hell.............. oh well the op never put up graphs for us to see anyway.lol
boy we sure have whored this thread all to hell.............. oh well the op never put up graphs for us to see anyway.lol
#135
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)