CR on lq9 ?
01-01-2009, 01:45 AM
#21
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: germantown, maryland
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there already on the car as im using the 317s that came off of it for my turbo build. it actually put down some really nice numbers with a catback and a tune so i would say that 241 are not as bad as people make them out be but 243 would be better, but it put down 368 rwhp and 374 rwtq in its current setup with 241s and a stock cam and those are sae corrected as soon as i get my camera back ill take pics and upload them for the nay sayers that will undoubtly follow. and this not a shot at you merv iv gained great info off you i just read back through this and edited this cause i can see how this could be takein that way, just for the record.
Last edited by pewter02z28gs; 01-01-2009 at 01:54 AM.
01-01-2009, 02:02 AM
#22
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 9,853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That would require a new intake manifold, tb, and somehow mating my return fuel to returnless rails. To much pain in the *** for me, and I don't think my cam is optimal for l92 heads (tsp 228r)
Can someone calculate my CR on the LQ9 with the 243 heads and cometic .06 head gasket? 317s milled to 68cc with a .04 cometic gasket may work nice as well.
Can someone calculate my CR on the LQ9 with the 243 heads and cometic .06 head gasket? 317s milled to 68cc with a .04 cometic gasket may work nice as well.
Last edited by GMCtrk; 01-01-2009 at 02:11 AM.
