Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

6.0L truck motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:26 PM
  #1  
adam954rr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Island Lake IL
Default 6.0L truck motor

I messed up the LS1 thats in my vette and im going to swap motors. My buddy has a 6.0L truck motor that he wants to sell me and im not too sure about it. Is there any good reason people get the 6.0L truck blocks over any LS blocks? Im new to all this stuff and I have no clue....
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:29 PM
  #2  
buckner01's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, Va
Default

im kinda in the same boat, i think i can get a running 6.0 for a descent price i just dont now jack about it, if i should get it or save the money for an ls
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:33 PM
  #3  
dray98ta's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: barnwell, sc
Default

i've got the lq9 in my trans am.. i put texas speed heads and cam with a bbk intake and it runs great.. i dont have any regrets... think extra weight is the main issue
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:33 PM
  #4  
nineeights10ss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

iron block, it can take a beating and can be bored out easily unlike the aluminum blocks. I have a thread started as well, wondering about what heads to use and whatnot.

I'm pretty sure a 2001+ lq4 with aluminum heads will bolt up to your t56 or auto no problem... there is an issue with the 99-00? lq4's having a longer crank which prohibits it matching to a newer tranny. I need someone to confirm though, that if the lq4 has aluminum heads in 2001 that it will match up.

But if you have money to spend there is a lot of power to be made from these engines.
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:36 PM
  #5  
adam954rr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Island Lake IL
Default

Originally Posted by dray98ta
i've got the lq9 in my trans am.. i put texas speed heads and cam with a bbk intake and it runs great.. i dont have any regrets... think extra weight is the main issue
Did you notice the weight? I have an LS2 intake, ported &polished LS6 heads, and an MS4 so i hope it will work out well.
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:39 PM
  #6  
adam954rr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Island Lake IL
Default

Originally Posted by nineeights10ss
iron block, it can take a beating and can be bored out easily unlike the aluminum blocks. I have a thread started as well, wondering about what heads to use and whatnot.

I'm pretty sure a 2001+ lq4 with aluminum heads will bolt up to your t56 or auto no problem... there is an issue with the 99-00? lq4's having a longer crank which prohibits it matching to a newer tranny. I need someone to confirm though, that if the lq4 has aluminum heads in 2001 that it will match up.

But if you have money to spend there is a lot of power to be made from these engines.

ok ok. sounds good. Im just wonderin how much money that would be!
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:42 PM
  #7  
dray98ta's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: barnwell, sc
Default

Originally Posted by adam954rr
Did you notice the weight? I have an LS2 intake, ported &polished LS6 heads, and an MS4 so i hope it will work out well.
nah i really didnt notice the weight.. don't think its as serious as people make it out to be.. that setup you should be awesome.. i've got the torquer3 would like to go to the ms4 soon though

Trending Topics

Old 03-02-2009 | 07:43 PM
  #8  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,888
Likes: 7
From: Houston,TX
Default

the 6.0 will bolt right in to your vette, need to use your acc., pulley, intake and manifolds.
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:44 PM
  #9  
buckner01's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, Va
Default

and what kind of wiring am i lookin at, putting it into a 94 formula
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:50 PM
  #10  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,888
Likes: 7
From: Houston,TX
Default

Originally Posted by buckner01
and what kind of wiring am i lookin at, putting it into a 94 formula
stand alone harness is your best bet.
many sponsors here carry them.------>>
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:58 PM
  #11  
RyderTA's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Default

The LQ4 has dished pistons and less compression than the LQ9. You can get more cubes out of the truck motors than the LS1 and it's pretty cheap, that's why a lot of people use them. That's probably what i'll go for when my motor gives out.
Old 03-02-2009 | 07:59 PM
  #12  
adam954rr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Island Lake IL
Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
the 6.0 will bolt right in to your vette, need to use your acc., pulley, intake and manifolds.
okay, thats what I want to hear! im glad that stuff will work. thanks!
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:01 PM
  #13  
adam954rr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Island Lake IL
Default

Originally Posted by dray98ta
nah i really didnt notice the weight.. don't think its as serious as people make it out to be.. that setup you should be awesome.. i've got the torquer3 would like to go to the ms4 soon though
ok ok, do you think it would be worth porting the tb and intake also?
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:05 PM
  #14  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,888
Likes: 7
From: Houston,TX
Default

not worth it, go with a ls6 intake instead. imo a ported tb is a waste of $
unless u can diy
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:06 PM
  #15  
armyspeedfreek's Avatar
Staging Lane

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

what is 60-80 lbs extra in the iron block any way i drove a c5 with an iron block did not like it at all too much nose weight
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:06 PM
  #16  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,888
Likes: 7
From: Houston,TX
Default

also need to reuse your oil pan, pickup tube and windage tray
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:11 PM
  #17  
buckner01's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Winchester, Va
Default

would i just get parts for an "lsx" would it be worth it to just freshen up the bottom end- bearings, rings, etc, and do a head and cam kit, and some bolt ons, like i said im learning about these things as i go along
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:11 PM
  #18  
knappbunch's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: va beach
Default

Weight is only about 95 lbs difference check my sig for my lq9
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:16 PM
  #19  
got-a-ls1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
From: earth
Default

unless your road racing i cant see the extra 80 pounds is really going to matter. and look at it this way. with a 4 inch bore stock or larger if you bore it, you can run l92 heads (ls3) and l76 intake and make sick sick power with a cam for cheap! if its the dished pistons though id definately tear it down and replace those and the rings/bearings at the same time. hell id just go ahead and buy a 402 rotating assembly and be done with it all LOL...
Old 03-02-2009 | 08:18 PM
  #20  
adam954rr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Island Lake IL
Default

Originally Posted by armyspeedfreek
what is 60-80 lbs extra in the iron block any way i drove a c5 with an iron block did not like it at all too much nose weight
you noticed it that much??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.