Stealth cam II Lobes
Thanks Pred for the quick responce, I thought they were lazy lobes not the XER's
also my friend has that cam on an lq4 stock bottom end with mildly ported 853s and that cam and made 393 unlocked thru a 3600 stall, with the usual bolt ons (longutbes, ls6 intake, etc) does that sound right?
cam only it is a bit sluggish below that.
Now raise the compression, shift points around 6800 rpm and it wakes up a bit more.
Back in the days, I ran low 11s with it and trapped 120mph+.
It also needs a very free exhaust, no cats (duals with X prefered)
So no, for a stock LS1, it is not the best choice due to its valve events, but in a tailored combo it has potential.For exemple it faired better in LS6 C5s.
Also this cam has to be degreed at exact ICL, otherwise it could end up retarded and push the band evenn further up.
By doing this I had advanced mine 2* to a 116+2 LSA
As to the ticking might want to do 2 things
1- Measure p-rod length and ad desired preload.
2- Check your O-ring gasket on the oil pick up tube.
All in all, that cam has the wrong valve events to achieve low end potential on a stock compression LS1.
It was done by MTI to mimic Stealth, there are better ways of doing that on stock compression.
Last edited by beedo; Apr 27, 2009 at 05:56 PM.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
It has comp cam TR proprietary lobes, those have a variance rate of 50 and are just 1 notch less agressive than XE-R
The TR224 is a much better cam than the MTI SII
on the 114 LSA, I think you'll like it and it is a huge improvement over LS6.
You'll need to tune it though, can't expect big gains if untuned.

