Trick Flow's 205cc heads
#61
LS1 Tech Administrator
iTrader: (14)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Please take these personal posts to PM and do not mess up what is an otherwise technical thread.
__________________
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic210_1.gif)
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic210_1.gif)
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
#63
TECH Fanatic
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Say what???
As I was tactfully replying to some direct questions from a recent post, that post up and disappeared! Must be Microsoft server software in use here.![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
As the man said, use the PM function.
Jon
As I was tactfully replying to some direct questions from a recent post, that post up and disappeared! Must be Microsoft server software in use here.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
As the man said, use the PM function.
Jon
#66
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
27 rwhp at/below 3000 rpm and at power peak rpm? Now that would be impressive. ![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Ya'll just have to post those dyno charts. 27 rwhp @ 3000 is 47+ lb ft, and at the tires. TRICKFLOW only showed about 10 lb-ft at the flywheel @ 3000 with a 5.3 (not a 4.8) in their posted dynochart.
A tad more info to support you claim whould certainly be helpful.
Jon
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Ya'll just have to post those dyno charts. 27 rwhp @ 3000 is 47+ lb ft, and at the tires. TRICKFLOW only showed about 10 lb-ft at the flywheel @ 3000 with a 5.3 (not a 4.8) in their posted dynochart.
A tad more info to support you claim whould certainly be helpful.
Jon
Ron,
Why should anyone believe your power/performance claims if you don't offer any data to back them up? Sorry, but that makes you sound like the ShamWOW guy on those TV commercials we all love. I must admit that they probably sell a lot of ShamWOWs, but just not to me.
I have no doubts that you could get 27 rwhp from those heads on a 4.8. The Trickflow chart showed over 70 fwhp at high rpm on a 5.3. I was only questioning how you got 27 rwhp "across the board" especially at low rpm.
Do you think I am bashing you because I ask you direct questions about supporting your claims? Is that "engaging in harsh, accusatory, threatening criticism"?
Ron, bashing you on HC would just be "preaching to the choir", wouldn't it?
Jon
Why should anyone believe your power/performance claims if you don't offer any data to back them up? Sorry, but that makes you sound like the ShamWOW guy on those TV commercials we all love. I must admit that they probably sell a lot of ShamWOWs, but just not to me.
I have no doubts that you could get 27 rwhp from those heads on a 4.8. The Trickflow chart showed over 70 fwhp at high rpm on a 5.3. I was only questioning how you got 27 rwhp "across the board" especially at low rpm.
Do you think I am bashing you because I ask you direct questions about supporting your claims? Is that "engaging in harsh, accusatory, threatening criticism"?
Ron, bashing you on HC would just be "preaching to the choir", wouldn't it?
Jon
However, i would rather have people like Strokerace around then to see them banned. I like the fact that there are people around who are knowledgable to question Sponsors and to keep them in check, otherwise you wind up with a place where paying sponsors can fling around any bullshit they want and claim it as fact to drum up business. That is especially likely in a place that has a "protect the sponsors at all costs" policy like this place. TO me, that is down right shady, and the best example is what goes on with shitty tunes that shops put out. If someone posts up an example of the shitty tune they receive from a sponsor shop, the likely result is the thread is deleted and the member banned. That is a disgrace and unethical in my opinion.
With that being said, was StrokerAce jumping on a chance to give you crap over your "27rwhp across the board" statement?? Perhaps. You may have meant to say "27rwhp at peak" or maybe "27rwtrq across the board", either of which would have made more sense or been more reasonable. Like StrokerAce said, a claim of "27rwhp across the board" works out to mean that you picked up something like 70lbs of torque at 3k rpms, which would be silly.
StrokerAce may have been checking you (Ron) on what he felt were B.S. claims, or he may have been jumping on the chance to call "BS" on you when it was really just a brain fart. I dont know. However, i would rather have someone serve this function then not.
But i must admit, the "you should tighten an oil pump bolt" or whatever reply is pretty F-ed up. I recall reading that article, i think it was Engine Master's, where that happened to the Bauers. To throw a something like that in their face, which could have been a simple mistake or a part failure for all we know (stripped nut?) is kinda lame. I am sure there are plenty of F-ups done by Vengeance racing that could be throw in your face , in fact i recall a recent tune job done that was a disaster that a member posted.
Fact is, mistakes happen. What matters, in my opinion, is whether something is a mistake or not giving a **** about quality of work and putting the dollar first before quality.
**edit**
i just re-read what i wrote and thought i needed to add something, because it sounds as though i am siding with Stroker to a degree. I am not claiming Ron is one of those sponsors who is fling BS around, i was merely saying what could happen if all opposition is silenced. I have no experience withVengeance or ROn, but many have and many seem very happy with the work done. Both Ron and StrokerAce may be great, truthful, honest guys who take pride in their work. Sadly, it is just a reality that not all people see eye to eye, especially over the net. The same guy you may sit down with and have a few laughs with over a beer in real life is the same guy you want to murder over the net. Its just the nature of the net.
Last edited by Johny GTO; 05-22-2009 at 02:50 PM.
#69
#70
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
if you are willing to spend the big dough on heads, i would go FI. may be a lil more money, but your performance bar is lifted sooo much higher.
#71
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think SstrokerAce was banned for bullshit reasons and I will never buy from the sponsors who got him banned for questioning them.
On topic though, I would like to try the trickflows on my Avalanch along with a nice small cam to make it tow a little better. Should be a good upgrade for the small engine guy's.
On topic though, I would like to try the trickflows on my Avalanch along with a nice small cam to make it tow a little better. Should be a good upgrade for the small engine guy's.
#73
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We just built a nice 5.3L engine using these 205 Trick Flow heads for a magazine project car.
Pretty impressed with the numbers. What we had:
TF 205 CNC heads
5.3L alum block
Stock 5.3 rods
Stock 5.3 crank
Stock 4.8L pistons (flat top)
LS2 intake (LS2 injectors)
Turn Key 90mm TB
TF 220/224 112LSA cam
stock lifters
Harland Sharp rockers
On the Superflow 901 dyno it made 491 hp at 6300 rpm and 444 tq at 4700 rpm. Those are corrected SAP numbers.
19 inches of vacuum at idle. I will get a dyno chart up in the next couple of days.
Pretty impressed with the numbers. What we had:
TF 205 CNC heads
5.3L alum block
Stock 5.3 rods
Stock 5.3 crank
Stock 4.8L pistons (flat top)
LS2 intake (LS2 injectors)
Turn Key 90mm TB
TF 220/224 112LSA cam
stock lifters
Harland Sharp rockers
On the Superflow 901 dyno it made 491 hp at 6300 rpm and 444 tq at 4700 rpm. Those are corrected SAP numbers.
19 inches of vacuum at idle. I will get a dyno chart up in the next couple of days.
#76
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We just built a nice 5.3L engine using these 205 Trick Flow heads for a magazine project car.
Pretty impressed with the numbers. What we had:
TF 205 CNC heads
5.3L alum block
Stock 5.3 rods
Stock 5.3 crank
Stock 4.8L pistons (flat top)
LS2 intake (LS2 injectors)
Turn Key 90mm TB
TF 220/224 112LSA cam
stock lifters
Harland Sharp rockers
On the Superflow 901 dyno it made 491 hp at 6300 rpm and 444 tq at 4700 rpm. Those are corrected SAP numbers.
19 inches of vacuum at idle. I will get a dyno chart up in the next couple of days.
Pretty impressed with the numbers. What we had:
TF 205 CNC heads
5.3L alum block
Stock 5.3 rods
Stock 5.3 crank
Stock 4.8L pistons (flat top)
LS2 intake (LS2 injectors)
Turn Key 90mm TB
TF 220/224 112LSA cam
stock lifters
Harland Sharp rockers
On the Superflow 901 dyno it made 491 hp at 6300 rpm and 444 tq at 4700 rpm. Those are corrected SAP numbers.
19 inches of vacuum at idle. I will get a dyno chart up in the next couple of days.
Yes indeed. i bet it would easily break 500hp with a Fast manifold installed. Probably end up around 510hp.
Very true. When i first read it, i did a double take. I was like "No F-ing way a 5.3 laid down almost 500rwhp without forced induction".
Then i realized it wasnt RWHP, but hp measured on an engine dyno. Still very impressive, none the less.
#77
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We just built a nice 5.3L engine using these 205 Trick Flow heads for a magazine project car.
Pretty impressed with the numbers. What we had:
TF 205 CNC heads
5.3L alum block
Stock 5.3 rods
Stock 5.3 crank
Stock 4.8L pistons (flat top)
LS2 intake (LS2 injectors)
Turn Key 90mm TB
TF 220/224 112LSA cam
stock lifters
Harland Sharp rockers
On the Superflow 901 dyno it made 491 hp at 6300 rpm and 444 tq at 4700 rpm. Those are corrected SAP numbers.
19 inches of vacuum at idle. I will get a dyno chart up in the next couple of days.
Pretty impressed with the numbers. What we had:
TF 205 CNC heads
5.3L alum block
Stock 5.3 rods
Stock 5.3 crank
Stock 4.8L pistons (flat top)
LS2 intake (LS2 injectors)
Turn Key 90mm TB
TF 220/224 112LSA cam
stock lifters
Harland Sharp rockers
On the Superflow 901 dyno it made 491 hp at 6300 rpm and 444 tq at 4700 rpm. Those are corrected SAP numbers.
19 inches of vacuum at idle. I will get a dyno chart up in the next couple of days.
Great numbers!!!!
__________________
http://www.trickflow.com/emain.asp
Click Above for Product Information
Click Above for Product Information
#78
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wow, I missed this post until it was flagged by a user and sent to me to moderate based on the fact that "This thread is destroyed by nastiness??"
How about everyone not dirty up the TFS thread.
But, here is an offer... Ed, Ghost Predator, Old SStroker etc.... Y'all know that the board does not have the same administrative staff that it once had. So, here is an offer. If anyone is interested I will start a new discussion thread in Advanced Tech, and we can all sit around and discuss why we feel X or Y is important.
Any interest???
How about everyone not dirty up the TFS thread.
But, here is an offer... Ed, Ghost Predator, Old SStroker etc.... Y'all know that the board does not have the same administrative staff that it once had. So, here is an offer. If anyone is interested I will start a new discussion thread in Advanced Tech, and we can all sit around and discuss why we feel X or Y is important.
Any interest???
#80
Banned
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We just built a nice 5.3L engine using these 205 Trick Flow heads for a magazine project car.
Pretty impressed with the numbers. What we had:
TF 205 CNC heads
5.3L alum block
Stock 5.3 rods
Stock 5.3 crank
Stock 4.8L pistons (flat top)
LS2 intake (LS2 injectors)
Turn Key 90mm TB
TF 220/224 112LSA cam
stock lifters
Harland Sharp rockers
On the Superflow 901 dyno it made 491 hp at 6300 rpm and 444 tq at 4700 rpm. Those are corrected SAP numbers.
19 inches of vacuum at idle. I will get a dyno chart up in the next couple of days.
Pretty impressed with the numbers. What we had:
TF 205 CNC heads
5.3L alum block
Stock 5.3 rods
Stock 5.3 crank
Stock 4.8L pistons (flat top)
LS2 intake (LS2 injectors)
Turn Key 90mm TB
TF 220/224 112LSA cam
stock lifters
Harland Sharp rockers
On the Superflow 901 dyno it made 491 hp at 6300 rpm and 444 tq at 4700 rpm. Those are corrected SAP numbers.
19 inches of vacuum at idle. I will get a dyno chart up in the next couple of days.