Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Just bought an lq4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2009, 06:00 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
livefast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: easton, md
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Just bought an lq4

Well i pulled the trigger on an lq4 today. question 1. how much do i have to mill the stock 317s for 10.5:1 question 2. how much for 11.5:1 question 3. where do you guys get custom cams cut for your lsx motors, if that's too costly what would be a good cam for a stock bottom end lq4, the compression numbers listed above, the heads cleaned up by me (light port), edelbrock performer manifold (or should i just go with the single plane?) 4. after i have the heads milled to get the type of compression i wan't how much will i have to worry about ptv contact, i will definitley clay the pistons before final assembly but would like to hear your advice 5. where do you get the correct length pushrods if the heads are cut? sorry for the long windedness i just know you guys know your sh#*, there's literally nobody better to ask.
Old 10-19-2009, 06:11 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

only way to get over 11:1 on a lq4 is with milled 5.3 heads.
the stock 317 heads will only go up to around 10:1 with a .030 mill. and thinner gasket, for 10.5: will need milled 243 or 799 heads.
lq4 come with 8cc spherical dish, so it gives room for some ptv clearance.
vic. jr is better than the dual plane manifold. cam and pr is length is up to you, need to verify pr length with new cam and valve train.
Old 10-19-2009, 06:15 PM
  #3  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
livefast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: easton, md
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

whats the disadvantage of the 5.3 head over the 317s and what will the c/r be without getting them milled? and also i see alot of guys upgrading to arp rod bolts should i grab a set before i drop this in my car? again sorry for all the questions
Old 10-19-2009, 06:29 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by livefast1
whats the disadvantage of the 5.3 head over the 317s and what will the c/r be without getting them milled? and also i see alot of guys upgrading to arp rod bolts should i grab a set before i drop this in my car? again sorry for all the questions
5.3 flow way less and have smaller intake valves, chmaber is around 9cc smaller. the 317 are excellent heads, same port as ls2 and ls6.
rod bolts are wise investment if plan on hi rpm.
stock lq4 scr is 9.4:1
Old 10-19-2009, 06:36 PM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
livefast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: easton, md
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it seems it would probably be wise to go with the rod bolts with the single plane and a decent sized cam so i will definitley pick those up. one last one, 241s even with upgraded springs go cheap. is it worth pickin up a set of those and having them milled especially if i'm gonna clean the ports up anyway (i've done a decent job portin ohc 4.6 heads, flowed them myself to show an improvement over the horrid stock cast ports, was taught a little bit about porting in school and got to utilize a superflow there)?
Old 10-19-2009, 06:49 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

the 241 need work, just to match the stock 317. and the chamber is really not that much smaller 67 to 71cc for 317. i would not trade flow potential for slightly more scr. if really need more than 10.5:1, will need to find 243 or 799 heads, anything else stock is a downgrade. mill the heads u have now and build around available flow and scr.
member patg on this board spec's excellent grinds based on the available parts.
Old 10-19-2009, 06:54 PM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
livefast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: easton, md
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome thanx for your help man. So do you think if i can mill to a little over 10:1, do a light porting on the heads myself, edelbrock vic jr, holley 750 dp, arp rod bolts, decent sized cam, and tig up a set of longtubes i can hit around 450rwhp (will be less i understand if i end up going with a stalled 400 but haven't made that decision yet)?
Old 10-19-2009, 06:58 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

a matched cam with that engine, heads, intake and headers will have no prob. acheiving up to the 450rw goal and thru a stalled th400. even with 10:1 scr.
Old 10-19-2009, 07:05 PM
  #9  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
livefast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: easton, md
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sweet thanx so much for all your help.
Old 10-19-2009, 07:11 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

the gm ls6, asa, and hot cam will also make strong performers in that motor with 10:1 scr. and the cams and springs are lower priced than the aftermarket parts.
Old 10-19-2009, 07:49 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
ls1camaro98's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

450rwhp with the 317s heads your saying??
Old 10-19-2009, 08:46 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
 
Paul57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Frozen Tundra, WI
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think the 243's are an excellent choice for the LQ4. It will put you comfortably over 10:1...someone on here should be able to tell you the exact ratio...somewhere in the ballpark of 10.3, I think. They have 65cc combustion chambers and flow is comparable to the 317. If you aren't going to shift over 6000 and this is a regular street driver, my personal view is the dual plane intake. It will provide considerably more torque in the lower range...there have been a few dyno's done in the mags.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.