











ms3 / torquer v.2 / 233/239
off the top of my head i would say that Tv2 would have slightly better street manners and possibly a small amount more torque down low. not sure it would ever be felt though.
if you plan to do heads down the road...might be worth considering that into the equation. the cams with really high lift/duration will affect how much you can mill a head or run bigger valves.
something to consider.
4.10's dont seem like much of a gear when I can go down the highway at 70 mph at 2k rpm's. Maybe with 4.56's I would recommend a big cam but I think these cars should have came with 4.10's
You said youre driving most of the time; I would go with TV2 or even lower for DD like the 228R cam.
And if you dont have rod bolts upgrade, you better be safe and not the spin the engine higher than 6500-6600..which will be the case with MS3 and 233/239.
I've checked some dyno results with the polluter and it seems that it doesnt peak that high(around 6500) so it might be an option.
4:10 will help street manners of the big cams, but you will still need to rev high..
Finally, bigger cams like better heads and intake setup, so you might better off with something like TV2.
I bought a TV3 that I may put in next year. You should check this cam this latest version of the torquer.
Last edited by Johnnystock; Nov 2, 2009 at 01:54 PM.
Trending Topics
It wouldnt make sense to me to run a spring that will be maxed out all the time rather than spend a few more bucks to get .650 springs that would also last longer.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time





