Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2002 LS1 Engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #1  
aron69nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default 2002 LS1 Engine

I have the opportunity to get one out of an SS Camaro for a reasonable price. 72,000 miles. Is there anything to look out for? Does this have the LS1 or LS6 intake, seeing as it's the SS car? What would be an ideal upgrade (affordable) to get around 400hp? Thanks for the input!
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 03:27 PM
  #2  
NBM.Z28™'s Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: LS1Tech.com
Default

Originally Posted by aron69nova
I have the opportunity to get one out of an SS Camaro for a reasonable price. 72,000 miles. Is there anything to look out for? Does this have the LS1 or LS6 intake, seeing as it's the SS car? What would be an ideal upgrade (affordable) to get around 400hp? Thanks for the input!
full bolt ons & a mild cam should get you to 400.
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #3  
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 1
From: Chi-town West Burbs
Default

All 2001-2002 LS cars had the LS6 intake manifold. It's the same engine in the base z28 as the ss.
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 03:34 PM
  #4  
aron69nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

So it sounds like a minimal extra investment will get me a good amount more power? This will be in a daily driver. I'm happy to hear that the intake is what I'd want. I'm thinking a cam with something like 220°/225° @ 0.050" and about 0.550" lift or so will get where I need to be? Any ideas? I still want good driveability and MPG. 1966 Nova wagon is the goal. Will keep the 4l60e as well.
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 03:39 PM
  #5  
King Nothing's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 26
From: Central Valley
Default

400 crank horsepower is achievable with that cam but not 400rwhp IMO go with a cam in the 230's and you should be above 400rwhp through a 4l60 good luck with the project!
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 03:44 PM
  #6  
aron69nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

I still am driving this every day and wouldn't mind good gas mileage. I think with a bigger cam it'd be a little tough to do so. Any reports from you guys on MPG with bigger cams? I know the aerodynamics of a camaro are much more forgiving...
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 04:30 PM
  #7  
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 1
From: Chi-town West Burbs
Default

http://www.engpwrsys.com/index.php?a...od&productId=8

Something like this. Call Geoff personally and ask him to help you customize it to your car.

Here's a dyno of one of his "baby" cams:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...k-results.html
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 04:53 PM
  #8  
aron69nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

What heads would be on this? Are they the 241 heads?
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 04:58 PM
  #9  
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 1
From: Chi-town West Burbs
Default

Originally Posted by aron69nova
What heads would be on this? Are they the 241 heads?
In that thread the heads were bone stock untouched 243's.
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 05:02 PM
  #10  
aron69nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

Yes, that's ridiculous power. And faster than I actually want (or need) to go!

I'm wondering if I could make similar power with this engine? So are the heads the same on a 2002 SS Camaro engine?
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 05:16 PM
  #11  
Paint_It_Black's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 1
From: Chi-town West Burbs
Default

Originally Posted by aron69nova
Yes, that's ridiculous power. And faster than I actually want (or need) to go!

I'm wondering if I could make similar power with this engine? So are the heads the same on a 2002 SS Camaro engine?
No, the heads are from the ls6 vette / cts-v or ls2's. They are worth 15 rwhp-ish in stock form over the 241's.
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 05:19 PM
  #12  
aron69nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

Cool. I am new to the LS1 scene. My other car is a '69 Nova with a traditional SBC that is becoming a 9 second car. I understand stuff about those engines a little better. I can get this 72,000 mile setup for $2800 to my door complete. Accessories, computer, everything. Cheap for the power...
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 11:22 PM
  #13  
Squirts11's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 897
Likes: 4
From: OKC, OK
Default

Originally Posted by aron69nova
Yes, that's ridiculous power. And faster than I actually want (or need) to go!
Blasphemy!
Reply
Old May 4, 2010 | 11:44 PM
  #14  
kinglt-1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,892
Likes: 253
From: Ft. Wayne, IN
Default

Stay thirsty my friend!
Reply
Old May 6, 2010 | 10:08 AM
  #15  
aron69nova's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by squirts11
Blasphemy!
I have a race car. It goes fast, and I can bang gears, too! Now stickshift racing, that's expensive.

I like going fast, but when I drive something every day it's tempting to get into more trouble!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 PM.