99wssixm6

iTrader: (3)

As the title says, is this cam to big for a stock cube m6 full exhaust 4.10:1 non daily driven car? I want a large cam similar to a torquer 2 or 3.

Please let me know your opnions.

I made a mistake - lift is actually .617 .624 !!!! I hope that isnt to big with stock valve 243 heads.

silverz28camaro

iTrader: (20)

Looks good to me, plus you have the 4.10's so it will work good together.

I have a tsp tv.2 cam 232 234 .595 .598 113lsa. not to big at all, plus drives very nice.

Paint_It_Black

iTrader: (1)

No, not even close.

orangeapeel

iTrader: (18)

I have run 10° more of duration on a stock cubed motor. 4.10's...your good to go.

99wssixm6

iTrader: (3)

Thanks for the info.....just checking.

bigfatls6

iTrader: (34)

I have a 231/237 595/595 cam in my z06 and love it. Should be good to go.

SVThis

iTrader: (2)

ran a 231/237 .585/.595 112 LSA with patriot stage 2.5 LS6 heads and put fown right at 450 Rwhp with a M6...i even had the stock 3.42 gear and didnt have any bucking or anything...drove like stock but sure didnt sound like it....its a very proven cam i say go for it!

winters97gt

I have a mid 230 cam in my car, and it drives great and makes good power. A buddy put down 436rwhp with his 2004 corvette on the same cam with stock heads/ls6 intake. It drives great too.

pharmd

iTrader: (4)

Anyone still run a cam like this with 3.42's? If you have a good tuner, and the rest of the setup is spot on, is the 4.10 a MUST? Trying to acheive stellar MPG FWIW.

Damian

iTrader: (89)

4:10's aren't a "must", but using any cams north of 230 degrees of duration with 3:42's is like buying a brand new 1080p HDTV and using a standard low-def DVD player on it.

FWIW, 4:10's don't reduce your mpg. Your right foot does after they're installed.

NVR_SPDS

iTrader: (39)

TSP 231/237 here. Full bolt ons, built T56, 3.42s, Dyno tune by Synergy Motorsports, and 25 MPG averaging 85mph on the highway.

SVThis

iTrader: (2)

mods above, no power adders i ran 7.2 in the 1/8th mile at 96 MPH with a 1.7 60 foot time....i dont see it being a big MUST...do u?

sscamaroburn02

iTrader: (14)

i'd say no. i have almost the same size cam as you with stock 3.42's and car drives great!!! It's all in the tune~

pharmd

iTrader: (4)

Thanks guys, putting those comments together answers my question...I will get my final answer when I get to drive it, post install.

soundengineer

iTrader: (16)

I'm a 234/242 111+2 .602/.605 with 18* of overlap on stock cubes...and stock 3.42's
no issues here

soundengineer

iTrader: (16)

actually...by sheer nature of turning higher rpm's...which requires more injector pulse width...you will lose some mpg...nothing major...but math is math..and physics is physics..

and I think your example of telling somebody that a 4:10 gear is like having an HD tv...is retarded
I've driven cams in the 240's on the stock 3.42's....
and I've driven them with 4.10's...and 4.56's...
gears are a personal choice...its not like the example stated above

Busy Mopper

iTrader: (4)

You will be fine!

99wssixm6

iTrader: (3)

Thanks,

Now I just have to get pushrods and valve springs. I put a set of the Pac springs in my buddys gto and I think Im gonna run them.

Pushrods Im not sure because I dont know what length to get?????

Details... details....details.....

02 BLK WS6

iTrader: (11)

231/237 on a 112 lsa here with 3.42 gears with an A4. Small tire car needs the gear for the 1/4.

Vindicated346

iTrader: (1)

I was spec'd a 230/238 600/604 112+2 with milled heads, I MIGHT have to flycut, but its def not TOO big for stock cubes