231/239 .595/.605 112 to big for stock cubes?
#1
231/239 .595/.605 112 to big for stock cubes?
As the title says, is this cam to big for a stock cube m6 full exhaust 4.10:1 non daily driven car? I want a large cam similar to a torquer 2 or 3.
Please let me know your opnions.
I made a mistake - lift is actually .617 .624 !!!! I hope that isnt to big with stock valve 243 heads.
Please let me know your opnions.
I made a mistake - lift is actually .617 .624 !!!! I hope that isnt to big with stock valve 243 heads.
Last edited by 99wssixm6; 07-29-2010 at 09:45 PM. Reason: error on submission
#7
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lee County, VA
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ran a 231/237 .585/.595 112 LSA with patriot stage 2.5 LS6 heads and put fown right at 450 Rwhp with a M6...i even had the stock 3.42 gear and didnt have any bucking or anything...drove like stock but sure didnt sound like it....its a very proven cam i say go for it!
Trending Topics
#8
I have a mid 230 cam in my car, and it drives great and makes good power. A buddy put down 436rwhp with his 2004 corvette on the same cam with stock heads/ls6 intake. It drives great too.
#14
#16
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
actually...by sheer nature of turning higher rpm's...which requires more injector pulse width...you will lose some mpg...nothing major...but math is math..and physics is physics..
and I think your example of telling somebody that a 4:10 gear is like having an HD tv...is retarded
I've driven cams in the 240's on the stock 3.42's....
and I've driven them with 4.10's...and 4.56's...
gears are a personal choice...its not like the example stated above