Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

comp 918's once and for all

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2010, 07:29 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
500@10psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: oh.
Posts: 176
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default comp 918's once and for all

so i've heard that they are only good to .6 lift and i've also heard that they are good to .625. now on comps web sight they say .625 but on tsp's they say .6. so which is it? can some guys with some experience pushing it chime in. i'm trying to see if they will work with a .598 lift cam and still have a decent safety margin. i would also like to put this dispute to bed.
Old 07-21-2010, 07:41 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
02*C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Az
Posts: 1,706
Received 297 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 500@10psi
so i've heard that they are only good to .6 lift and i've also heard that they are good to .625. now on comps web sight they say .625 but on tsp's they say .6. so which is it? can some guys with some experience pushing it chime in. i'm trying to see if they will work with a .598 lift cam and still have a decent safety margin. i would also like to put this dispute to bed.
If they are a comp spring which they are and they are advertising .625 i would take their word for it. Each retailer will advertise what they need to to make sure they are safe from liability. Go with the comp numbers make sure that your when you set them up you do it correctly and make sure that the cam is with with in specs. Now and this is personal choice. If your cam is .625 lift I would rather do a spring with a .675 lift. Give your self some room for an accidental over rev or something. Rule of thumb .050 lift more than your final lift number. But that is just a personal choice.
Old 07-21-2010, 07:59 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
The_Rizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the the rated number for the springs includes a bit of room for coil bind. With a beehive its a bit more difficult to see, but if you look at the installed height minus the coil bind number, it gives you the total amount the spring could theoretically take, but is not rated for. ie, in the case of the 918's, installed height is 1.8, coil bind it 1.110, so the spring has .690 of travel. There's lots left from coil bind at .625.

The only other thing to worry about is how intense your cam profile is, a very agressive lobe getting to .625 could be hell on that spring, even if it's rated for the same lift. A very aggressive lobe usually calls for more spring pressure though.

I saw an ad in an older (2007) EMC mag, and even then they said .625, so if it fits into the rest of your build, I'd say go for it.
Old 07-21-2010, 08:04 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
 
FC3S Murray's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Montana
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

So are the 918's finally over the hic-up they had a while ago with breaking..?..?
Old 07-21-2010, 08:15 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
 
The_Rizzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Apparently theres a new set out (again). Its too bad they dropped PAC as their supplier years ago.

I just installed a used set (i know, extreme budget build) into an offroad racing truck, the thing saw 7500 more than a couple times this weekend. Checked out ok.

If you're not very comfortable with the 918's, PAC has a hi quality beehive rated to the same specs, 1218's, thats well known for being reliable. They also have a better (I think nitrided) version thats rated to .650, if you've got lightweight valve-train, 1518, but they ain't as cheap...
Old 07-21-2010, 08:33 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (22)
 
Emulsifide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ferndale, Mi
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here's the scoup according to the packaging of my brand new 918 springs.

The absolute newest set of 918 springs come in a satin finish and can handle a lift of .625".

Also, they no longer have a blue stripe. Here's a picture:



Here's a picture of an older blue stripe 918 next to a stock ls1 spring:



Even though the white balance is different between my picture and the one I found on the internet, you can deduce the following. In the blue stripe picture, the 918 spring is darker than the ls1 spring. Have a look at my picture and you can see the updated 918 spring is much lighter than my stock 799 head springs that are in the same picture (which are the same color as my ls1 springs off of my 241 heads). With that, you can say the color difference between the two is significantly different and it should be pretty easy to tell the two apart.
Old 07-21-2010, 08:46 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
9t8z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Doylestown, Pa
Posts: 1,349
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Never had a problem with my 918's on my blown LS1 and over revving. Sometimes when your fooling around, its impossible to keep it off of the rev limiter. The only reason I sold my 918's was because the Trick Flow heads came with springs. I bought my 918's new about 2 years ago. I think the issues were hear and there and not as common as you think. You mostly hear the bad and not so much of the good.
Old 07-21-2010, 09:12 PM
  #8  
Banned
iTrader: (4)
 
Derek@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bowling Green
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

depending upon the installed height you set them up at, you can get a little more psi out of them...just double check for coil bind...
Old 07-21-2010, 11:31 PM
  #9  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,149
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The_Rizzle
the the rated number for the springs includes a bit of room for coil bind. With a beehive its a bit more difficult to see, but if you look at the installed height minus the coil bind number, it gives you the total amount the spring could theoretically take, but is not rated for. ie, in the case of the 918's, installed height is 1.8, coil bind it 1.110, so the spring has .690 of travel. There's lots left from coil bind at .625.

The only other thing to worry about is how intense your cam profile is, a very agressive lobe getting to .625 could be hell on that spring, even if it's rated for the same lift. A very aggressive lobe usually calls for more spring pressure though.

I saw an ad in an older (2007) EMC mag, and even then they said .625, so if it fits into the rest of your build, I'd say go for it.
This is how you should go about looking at springs if you don't see the lift rating for them. You can figure out the total lift they'll take pre coil bind, but know there needs to be a slight safety buffer in there. This post encompasses what you need to know.



Quick Reply: comp 918's once and for all



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 AM.