Explain difference between X-ER and cam motion lobes?

Well basically this is why im wanting to know. The FMS 226 .575 114 is on cammotion lobes (or so ive heard) However TSP is runing a great deal on everything I need for the cam swap. So I was thinking about getting the cam on an X-ER lobe but im afraid that it wont work as well as the FMS cam. Mike H. (i can never spell his last name) dynoed 400hp in a cam only set up with a 4400 stall and 4.10's. Im looking for similar numbers.
do a search for cam motion lobes, there was a thread about them not to long ago.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
.
.Well the FMS cam did have better mid range, but like I said the comparison is still flawed. My old Stage II heads flowed well and at .600 lift they were right at 304cfm, while my Stage I's were at 290cfm at the same lift. However, my Stage I's low to mid lift flow #'s were a lot better than my Stage II heads. Also the compression was over a point higher than my Stage I's. Also, my Stage II heads had 2.08 x 1.60 valves and my Stage I's had stock valves. As you can see.. A very difficult comparison. Now I am biased to Futral Motorsports because Candy and Allan are awesome, but both cams felt the same during everyday driving.
Thanks
Thanks
49 is for XE-R lobes and 53 is for the standard XE lobe. 





