Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Are Comp Lifters Better Than LS7 Lifters?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2012, 07:24 AM
  #41  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
hiltsy855's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,148
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Ok, will do.
Old 10-04-2012, 07:31 AM
  #42  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exidous
Just an idea, but the noise could be the exhaust valve closing due to the faster ramp rate of the lobes. The XER's had really fast ramp near .005" so I get a bit or "sewing" machine. No lifter change or preload change helped. I haven't tried a cam with a different lobe profile but I will be in the near future.
I had Pat G spec be a cam that controlled the exhaust better and I think it used LXL or LSL lobes, cannot remember which, but I never got around to having it made. i am currently using the comp XER profile that comes with the TSP 228r cam.
If the XER lobe was the last lobe on the face of the earth I had to choose from....let's just say I don't ever use the XER lobes. Too harsh a closing ramp, too aggressive tappet lift, too aggressive IMO in general just like the LSK lobes.

With a really really and I mean really ridiculously light valve-train I might use them, but there are so many other better lobe families IMO to chose from I just never use them.

I've done many LSL/LXL, LXL/LXL, LXL/HUC, HUC/HUC lobe combinations and not had one person complain about valve-train noise with .060"-.080" pre load.

Just to add to the Straub Technologies talk, Chris is much more than an "internet parts distributor".
Old 10-04-2012, 07:46 AM
  #43  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
miami993c297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Palm Beach fl usa
Posts: 934
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick

Just to add to the Straub Technologies talk, Chris is much more than an "internet parts distributor".
...

Christian
Old 10-04-2012, 08:26 AM
  #44  
Staging Lane
 
J Glen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry guys I work two jobs and can't always be on here. Actually the expensive comp link bars are made by comp. No comment on them though. I do work for Chris, and we do not make them. However, Chris and Ed Morel and good friends and he knows everything there is to know about these lifters. There is more to think about other than RPM's with the street series lifter. Lift and duration are big factors on that. When you get around .600 lift and 235 duration @50 I advise going to the better lifters. OP sorry I posted so many times without giving you my input on your topic.
Old 10-04-2012, 08:45 AM
  #45  
TECH Apprentice
 
99 2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by miami993c297
Not being the same piece means new machining programs, new control tools and control sequences, and because of tighter tolerance, more rejected parts (assuming the parts are starting from the same point same place...)

Numbers are not adding...Comp is +/- $70 above...that's % their margin on the same product GM is selling by thousands for the same end profit with a lower margin...

I would follow someone's advice that knows about Lifter Business!

Buy Mexican, and be happy with.

Christian
I definitely would not bet on them coming from the same place, like I said I compared the the comp lifter to the LS7 and the pushrod seats and retainer clip were different, also noticed the oiling hole had a different chamfer on the body.
Old 10-04-2012, 08:55 AM
  #46  
Staging Lane
 
J Glen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Actually GM has 3 different companies that makes their lifters for them.
Old 10-04-2012, 09:06 AM
  #47  
TECH Apprentice
 
99 2500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by J Glen
Actually GM has 3 different companies that makes their lifters for them.
Well then, I must have gotten the best of the three : )
Old 10-04-2012, 09:20 AM
  #48  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
hiltsy855's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,148
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
If the XER lobe was the last lobe on the face of the earth I had to choose from....let's just say I don't ever use the XER lobes. Too harsh a closing ramp, too aggressive tappet lift, too aggressive IMO in general just like the LSK lobes.

With a really really and I mean really ridiculously light valve-train I might use them, but there are so many other better lobe families IMO to chose from I just never use them.

I've done many LSL/LXL, LXL/LXL, LXL/HUC, HUC/HUC lobe combinations and not had one person complain about valve-train noise with .060"-.080" pre load.

Just to add to the Straub Technologies talk, Chris is much more than an "internet parts distributor".
Thanks for the info Martin. I am planning on a XXX/LXL cam this time around.
Old 10-04-2012, 09:23 AM
  #49  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
hiltsy855's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,148
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by J Glen
Sorry guys I work two jobs and can't always be on here. Actually the expensive comp link bars are made by comp. No comment on them though. I do work for Chris, and we do not make them. However, Chris and Ed Morel and good friends and he knows everything there is to know about these lifters. There is more to think about other than RPM's with the street series lifter. Lift and duration are big factors on that. When you get around .600 lift and 235 duration @50 I advise going to the better lifters. OP sorry I posted so many times without giving you my input on your topic.
J Glen - Thanks, no apologies necessary. It's nice to have 1st-hand info from someone in your position.
Old 10-04-2012, 09:25 AM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
hiltsy855's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,148
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 2500
Well then, I must have gotten the best of the three : )
I must have the worst of the 3!!!!
Old 10-04-2012, 09:50 AM
  #51  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hiltsy855
Thanks for the info Martin. I am planning on a XXX/LXL cam this time around.
Never heard of them there XXX lobes
Old 10-04-2012, 09:56 AM
  #52  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
hiltsy855's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,148
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
Never heard of them there XXX lobes
New, ultra quiet, **** lobes....
Old 10-04-2012, 01:40 PM
  #53  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

The XXX lobe goes down real easy.

Kurt
Old 10-04-2012, 03:40 PM
  #54  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hiltsy855
New, ultra quiet, **** lobes....
I always thought **** was loud, and hardcore..........I'm going to get myself in trouble....
Originally Posted by 427
The XXX lobe goes down real easy.

Kurt
Not you too!
Old 10-04-2012, 03:48 PM
  #55  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
hiltsy855's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,148
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

This thread started out with some good useful info but it's going downhill in a hurry LOL . Note to self - never mentioned **** in a thread where the discussion cover things that go in & out / up & down.....
Old 10-04-2012, 04:42 PM
  #56  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
DallasFMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Morel makes an excellent product. You could also look at the "Caddie Race Lifters" from the CTS-Vs, GM# 88958689.

Old 10-04-2012, 04:56 PM
  #57  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
miami993c297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Palm Beach fl usa
Posts: 934
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DallasFMS
Morel makes an excellent product. You could also look at the "Caddie Race Lifters" from the CTS-Vs, GM# 88958689.

Is that serious???
Old 10-04-2012, 05:54 PM
  #58  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
DallasFMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We have had customers and one employee that were having issues with LS7 lifters that switched to the Caddie ones and have yet to report a problem. SO from what customers are telling me they are happier with the Caddies over the LS7s that they themselves swapped.
Old 10-04-2012, 07:25 PM
  #59  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
hiltsy855's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,148
Received 28 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

I haven't read too many good reports on the Caddy lifters, at least on this board.
Old 10-05-2012, 09:39 AM
  #60  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
DallasFMS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No worries. Just letting you know what we have seen/heard in the last 9 months. LS7 coming apart like crazy and the Caddy ones holding strong.

The Morels are still worth the money though imo.


Quick Reply: Are Comp Lifters Better Than LS7 Lifters?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 AM.