Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Heads question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2013, 12:54 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (26)
 
transwiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Heads question

If I have a set of 243 heads with stage one porting with 2.00" (stock valve
size) verses an identical set with 2.O2" and 1.57" exhaust how much app,
horsepower to the wheels difference would there be.
346 ls1 with 224 cam,ls6 intake,kooks long tubes and high flow cats,and
a good dyno tune.

The reason I am asking is a machine shop I talked to said that It would not
be worth it to install the 2.02" etc valves . He said the horsepower difference
would not make the work worth the money. I don't think I believe him.
A friend of mine says that it would be about 20 hp at the wheels. What do you
guys think?
Old 02-15-2013, 04:30 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Your machine shop is correct. 2.0 valves on stock cubes is plenty. A 2.02 valve will only flow maybe 10cfm more than stock 2.0.
Old 02-15-2013, 08:05 AM
  #3  
9 Second Club
 
onefast84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So how much horse power do you think is 10 cfm worth? This seems interesting on what people think 10 cfm is worth.
Old 02-15-2013, 08:14 AM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
TurboMonte100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A 10 cfm increase with everything else perfect and in the upper rpm ranges can produce 2.57 hp per cylinder, so times 8 would be 20.56 hp flywheel.

I agree with your machine shop.
Old 02-15-2013, 09:38 AM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
batboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

With the 2.02 valves, you'll gain a little more intake flow at high rpm, maybe 5-10 hp. The heavier valve might limit your redline a bit. Looking at your signature mods, I probably would not worry about stepping up to a larger valve.
Old 02-15-2013, 10:44 AM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
 
97camaro383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im kind of in the same situation, I can't decide if I should use stock valves or have TEA put the 2.04int 1.575 ext valves in. Also should I get turned down ls3 valves or just have TEA put the manley valves in. What are the power benefits of the 2.04 vs the 2.00 and when does shrouding start to become a issue?
Old 02-15-2013, 12:34 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

PREDATOR-Z, I'd love to get your input on CND'd 243 heads. I know AI uses stock sized valves with both their 226cc and 232cc programs and TEA uses larger valves in their Stage 2 ported heads. I looked at the flow numbers and the TEA heads flow better, but what is your opinion on which of the two is better? I've seen many of your threads with great results from AI heads. I guess I'm asking is there going to be much HP/TQ difference between the TEA Stage 2 heaeds and the AI 232cc heads?
Old 02-15-2013, 01:54 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

The only way to truly answer that is to flow them back to back under same conditions.
Both are good products.
Personally I'm a fan of light moving valve-train, meaning light valves, retainers and beehives. (Perhaps part of the reason I've no issues controlling harsh ramps at reasonable rpms)



Quick Reply: Heads question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM.