Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Heads question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2013 | 12:54 AM
  #1  
transwiz's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 648
Likes: 1
Default Heads question

If I have a set of 243 heads with stage one porting with 2.00" (stock valve
size) verses an identical set with 2.O2" and 1.57" exhaust how much app,
horsepower to the wheels difference would there be.
346 ls1 with 224 cam,ls6 intake,kooks long tubes and high flow cats,and
a good dyno tune.

The reason I am asking is a machine shop I talked to said that It would not
be worth it to install the 2.02" etc valves . He said the horsepower difference
would not make the work worth the money. I don't think I believe him.
A friend of mine says that it would be about 20 hp at the wheels. What do you
guys think?
Old 02-15-2013 | 04:30 AM
  #2  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 16
From: BFE
Default

Your machine shop is correct. 2.0 valves on stock cubes is plenty. A 2.02 valve will only flow maybe 10cfm more than stock 2.0.
Old 02-15-2013 | 08:05 AM
  #3  
onefast84's Avatar
9 Second Club

 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

So how much horse power do you think is 10 cfm worth? This seems interesting on what people think 10 cfm is worth.
Old 02-15-2013 | 08:14 AM
  #4  
TurboMonte100's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Central Indiana
Default

A 10 cfm increase with everything else perfect and in the upper rpm ranges can produce 2.57 hp per cylinder, so times 8 would be 20.56 hp flywheel.

I agree with your machine shop.
Old 02-15-2013 | 09:38 AM
  #5  
batboy's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 2
From: middle of nowhere, Kansas
Default

With the 2.02 valves, you'll gain a little more intake flow at high rpm, maybe 5-10 hp. The heavier valve might limit your redline a bit. Looking at your signature mods, I probably would not worry about stepping up to a larger valve.
Old 02-15-2013 | 10:44 AM
  #6  
97camaro383's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
Default

Im kind of in the same situation, I can't decide if I should use stock valves or have TEA put the 2.04int 1.575 ext valves in. Also should I get turned down ls3 valves or just have TEA put the manley valves in. What are the power benefits of the 2.04 vs the 2.00 and when does shrouding start to become a issue?
Old 02-15-2013 | 12:34 PM
  #7  
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 10
From: Jefferson City, MO
Default

PREDATOR-Z, I'd love to get your input on CND'd 243 heads. I know AI uses stock sized valves with both their 226cc and 232cc programs and TEA uses larger valves in their Stage 2 ported heads. I looked at the flow numbers and the TEA heads flow better, but what is your opinion on which of the two is better? I've seen many of your threads with great results from AI heads. I guess I'm asking is there going to be much HP/TQ difference between the TEA Stage 2 heaeds and the AI 232cc heads?

Trending Topics

Old 02-15-2013 | 01:54 PM
  #8  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 16
From: BFE
Default

The only way to truly answer that is to flow them back to back under same conditions.
Both are good products.
Personally I'm a fan of light moving valve-train, meaning light valves, retainers and beehives. (Perhaps part of the reason I've no issues controlling harsh ramps at reasonable rpms)



Quick Reply: Heads question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 PM.