Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.125" bore with a LQ4 Block?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2004, 07:08 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
tommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 4.125" bore with a LQ4 Block?

I am thinking of concreting the water jackets of a LQ4 block and boring to 4.125. It is to be the powerplant for my track only drag car. Has anyone tryed this with any luck?
Old 04-22-2004, 07:25 AM
  #2  
Super Moderator
iTrader: (9)
 
Reckless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canton, GA
Posts: 10,052
Received 32 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

I really doubt it. How will you cool it without water jackets?
Old 04-22-2004, 08:10 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHRISPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

considering there is only 4.1 bore spacing wouldn't this pose a problem?
Old 04-22-2004, 08:41 AM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
DaleMX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia!
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well CR5 blocks can be 4.125 and they use the stock LS1 crank I believe, so the bore spacing must be like 4.25
Old 04-22-2004, 09:41 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
LOnSLO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Bore spacing is more like 4.48 I believe. Are you planning on running alcohol?
Old 04-22-2004, 09:47 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
 
stealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can't do 4.125 bore with an LQ4 block, I have one. Maybe 4.080, depending on power levels. Ask MTI.
Old 04-22-2004, 09:52 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Taspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 636
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

yes if you concrete in the water jackets you could prolly get away with it for a track/drag only car. I have thought about doing this to some 5.3's and expiramenting with it. I was only planning to do a 70% fill. Not a full fill though. I know old school it is common practice to fill the bbc up and run them without water pumps, but again they fire up...make a run and sit for an hour cooling off. so, yes it should be feasible to do. As far as bore size. I'm questioning the thickness of the actual sleeve bore that is there stock. It may not be that thick. You would really need to sonic test it first as that is a LOT of cylinder wall to take away.
Old 04-22-2004, 10:10 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yup. There is a lot more cylinder wall than a stock ls1/ls6, but there is no way you can get to a 4.125" bore. With the perfect block, you're looking at more like 4.080" and even then you're getting paper thin on the walls.

We ended up going .030" over on my iron block. It was sonic tested and could have supported more. In a street/strip car, I want a much cylinder wall as I can.
Old 04-22-2004, 10:36 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
stealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DenzSS
Yup. There is a lot more cylinder wall than a stock ls1/ls6, but there is no way you can get to a 4.125" bore. With the perfect block, you're looking at more like 4.080" and even then you're getting paper thin on the walls.

We ended up going .030" over on my iron block. It was sonic tested and could have supported more. In a street/strip car, I want a much cylinder wall as I can.
DenzSS,
I want to leave the mountain and make some passes in Topeka, KC, etc. Which track is best?
Old 04-22-2004, 10:47 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Topeka is the better track, but personally I prefer KCIR. Smaller track, friendlier people, etc. Just a preference.

If you're looking to bust down some good times, I'd hit Topeka first.
Old 04-22-2004, 10:51 AM
  #11  
TECH Resident
 
stealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DenzSS
Topeka is the better track, but personally I prefer KCIR. Smaller track, friendlier people, etc. Just a preference.

If you're looking to bust down some good times, I'd hit Topeka first.
OK, I have heard that Topeka is a fast track. Thanks.
Old 04-22-2004, 10:51 AM
  #12  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Nasty N8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

We have a 4.125" bore Iron block it is filled with Darton sleeves. It will hold anything you can through at it. The block we have is going to be 1200hp. Should have some dyno runs soon.

Nate
Old 04-22-2004, 10:53 AM
  #13  
TECH Resident
 
stealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have not been referring to sleeved blocks.
Old 04-22-2004, 10:54 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nor have I.
Old 04-22-2004, 10:59 AM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
tommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Did you install the sleeves yourself? Does Darton recommend any epoxies or locking compounds with their sleeves? Thanks for the pictures!

Tommy

Originally Posted by Nasty N8
We have a 4.125" bore Iron block it is filled with Darton sleeves. It will hold anything you can through at it. The block we have is going to be 1200hp. Should have some dyno runs soon.

Nate
Old 04-22-2004, 11:14 AM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHRISPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stealth
I have not been referring to sleeved blocks.
same here, talking about 6L iron blocks bored only. 4.125 isnt going to happen
Old 04-22-2004, 11:24 AM
  #17  
TECH Resident
 
stealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's unanimous, you could bore the LQ4 block to as much as 4.080 (I'm at 4.060), or you could sleeve it to a larger bore. The later option is a topic I know little about, but I suspect that it is relatively expensive.
Old 04-22-2004, 11:36 AM
  #18  
TECH Senior Member
 
CHRISPY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I wouldnt even go .080 (I know people have done it) and I certainly wouldnt' spray a .080 over 6L block.

Even going 0.030 over you should sonic test the block. (thickness can vary a lot between cylinders)
Old 04-22-2004, 11:40 AM
  #19  
TECH Resident
 
stealth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris ARE 360
I wouldnt even go .080 (I know people have done it) and I certainly wouldnt' spray a .080 over 6L block.

Even going 0.030 over you should sonic test the block. (thickness can vary a lot between cylinders)
I agree. We have tested my block in every way known to mankind, but I also know a guy here in Denver that tested 6 LQ4 blocks and all of them sucked. If I build another LS1 motor, I'll use aluminum.
Old 04-22-2004, 11:40 AM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
 
DenzSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris ARE 360
I wouldnt even go .080 (I know people have done it) and I certainly wouldnt' spray a .080 over 6L block.

Even going 0.030 over you should sonic test the block. (thickness can vary a lot between cylinders)
Yup.

We went .030" so I could spray it if I wanted to. (after sonic testing)



Quick Reply: 4.125" bore with a LQ4 Block?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.