6.0L Build
Building a 6.0L LQ4 out of a 2003 Truck.
What I want to do is:
I already have an LS6 intake
Stock Heads with .030 shaved to get the LQ9 compression
Cam and Springs.
This is going in a 1951 Ford Car
4l80E Trans and stock converter
373 gears in the rear
Block hugger headers because of clearance
I called comp cams but didn't get much info from them.
I am looking for someone that has had a similar build to give me some knowledge on what came to use?
Or some of the experts to point me in the direction to decide what Cam to use.
Comp Cams told me I needed a
Cam, Springs kit, trunyon kit, push rods,rockers,lifters is this true or can I get by with Cam and springs and push rods?
I know Cams are very important and want to make sure I get this correct
Thanks
@niscur29: is this the CAM you are using?
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/hrs-197715-10
You didn't do any head work? How long have you been running it?
Trever
I would do a converter BEFORE a cam, yes there are cams that will drive OK on a stock converter but you will get more performance from a converter first.
If you do do a cam I would do the trunnion upgrade on stock rockers, but would reuse stock lifters so long as they pass an inspection.
http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/c...csid=1092&sb=2
thoughts?
Trending Topics
Far as converter use a GOOD smaller diameter unit from someone like Yank, Vigilante or on the "budget" end Ege Racing converters, don't buy something from a company like TCI or B&M.
You are going to get bad info if you call companies like Comp and TCI and such, the "tech lines" are staffed by people looking for a job. Big companies can have good products but the real enthusiasts who develop those products aren't the ones answering the 800 lines.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
My goal here is to bring the compression to the LQ9 compression.
Thanks
You could slap on a set of the 862 castings from a 5.3L and get about 10.5:1. Mill them down and you're looking at over 11:1, which would probably offset the fact that the 5.3L heads have smaller valves. Of course, you could fix that by having the machine shop cut the larger valve job and using the bigger valves from the 317 heads.
Your saying if I went with the 5.3 heads and use my valves (after they open them up) This would get me to the 10:5:1?
Do you have any articles on this?
Can you get too high of compression ie 11:1. I know my tuned port that came out of the car I had two much compression and I had to lower it in order to get it to run good.
Your saying if I went with the 5.3 heads and use my valves (after they open them up) This would get me to the 10:5:1?
Do you have any articles on this?
Can you get too high of compression ie 11:1. I know my tuned port that came out of the car I had two much compression and I had to lower it in order to get it to run good.
No. Just slapping on the 862's with the stock 61cc chambers will get you to about 10.47:1. Depending on the valve job, cutting for the larger valves could open up the chambers a little bit, probably no more than 1cc, which would get about 10.35:1. If you then mill the heads .030", you should see the chamber volume reduced to about 56cc (typically .006" per cc) which would put you at about 11.12:1 on a stock LQ4 shortblock and GM MLS gaskets. You can use THIS LINK and plug in the numbers and see for yourself what compression ratios you can come up with by changing any of the variables.
I'm at about 11.1:1 on my engine and I use 93 octane. I've never put in any lower octane, but 11:1 is pretty safe for even 91 if that's all you have.
No. Just slapping on the 862's with the stock 61cc chambers will get you to about 10.47:1. Depending on the valve job, cutting for the larger valves could open up the chambers a little bit, probably no more than 1cc, which would get about 10.35:1. If you then mill the heads .030", you should see the chamber volume reduced to about 56cc (typically .006" per cc) which would put you at about 11.12:1 on a stock LQ4 shortblock and GM MLS gaskets. You can use THIS LINK and plug in the numbers and see for yourself what compression ratios you can come up with by changing any of the variables.
I'm at about 11.1:1 on my engine and I use 93 octane. I've never put in any lower octane, but 11:1 is pretty safe for even 91 if that's all you have.
Here is his recommendations any thoughts would be appreciated. Thinking about ordering this tomorrow.
CAM
223/230 111 +4 is the numbers he gave me.
He also said to go with a 3200 stall
Thoughts?







