TR230 and FMS F13?
#1
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Specs.
TR230 – 230/224 .571/.563 111+0
FMS F13 – 230/232 .59x/.58x 112+2
I am currently running a TR224/114 cam, 4000 stall, and the other mods in the sig. Which cam will provide the most power gains above my TR224 and will give the best performance at the drag strip? I shift at 6500.
Thanks
John
TR230 – 230/224 .571/.563 111+0
FMS F13 – 230/232 .59x/.58x 112+2
I am currently running a TR224/114 cam, 4000 stall, and the other mods in the sig. Which cam will provide the most power gains above my TR224 and will give the best performance at the drag strip? I shift at 6500.
Thanks
John
#3
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by SSOnYourSix
ive never used the FM cam, but the TR230 is pretty useless down low... one of my customers that switched to a G5x3 had it and it sucked below 4000 rpm... just my input though
#4
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for the quick feedback.
My heads are milled .015 with 2.02 intake and stock exhaust valves.
Will there be any P to V problems?
Will the Comp 987 springs that I am running be sufficient with these cams?
Thank
John
My heads are milled .015 with 2.02 intake and stock exhaust valves.
Will there be any P to V problems?
Will the Comp 987 springs that I am running be sufficient with these cams?
Thank
John
#5
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It all depends on how you get the cam set-up as to whther or not there will be clearence issues. You can have it cut on 112 or 114 with up to 4 degrees advance if you like. 112 +4 will be most likley to cause P/V contact and 114 +0 will be the least likley to hit. I'm pretty sure you would be able to get away with the 112 +4, but Futral would know better than I would. The 987's you have will be fine.
#7
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
I guess you and I can agree on something. The TR 230 would act just like the 224 cam you have now untill 5200 rpm's or so. Then it will pull away from it. The FMS cam would make more low-end power and still pull away on the big end. I think the choice will be easy.
![Werd](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/werd.gif)
![Cheers!!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_cheers.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by badpewter-z
you still on a stock rear? any gears? because my tr230 definetly doenst feel weak down low pulls hard from 3000 on all day long
I have the stock rear.
My 4000rpm stall converter keeps my engine RPM at or above 5000 throughout the 1/4 mile.
In a ¼ run my RPM is between 5000 and 6500 the entire time. I want to increase the HP in that range.
I already have the TR230 cam (Not installed yet. Still running the TR224.) but if the FMS F13 will make more HP in the above range than the TR230 then that is the way I will go.
Thanks
John
Last edited by JNorris; 05-31-2004 at 09:21 PM.
#12
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by badpewter-z
oh sorry thought you still had the 224
Sorry for the confusion.
I do still have the TR224 installed but I also have a TR230 waiting to go in. If the FMS F13 will make more from 5000+ RPM then I will sell the TR230 and buy the F13.
My TR224 has been very good to me. My best run with it was 11.18 @ 120.24 in the 1/4 and 7.10 @ 96.08 in the 1/8. My goal is to get into the 10s but I do not think the TR224 will get me there which is why I need a bigger cam.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
Thanks
John
#13
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
With both cams having the same intake duration, I don't think the big end numbers would be worth a cam swap. For a 5000+ rpm plus gain, you might want to look at a G5X-3.
I agree but I feel sure that there will be P to V problems with my heads being milled .015. I am looking to put in a cam that will get me the most HP gains from 5000 - 6500 RPM without having to fly cut the pistons.
Thanks
John