Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam Selection-stalled Auto

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2015 | 11:18 AM
  #1  
NJNETSFAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 603
Likes: 3
From: Royal Oak, Mi
Default Cam Selection-stalled Auto

Hey guys, looking for opinions on cam choice. Last year my car had stock 241 heads, MS3 cam, bbk intake and TB, and a 3500 stall and went 11.6 in the 1/4. I've ditched the BBK setup and went with a ported fast 90 and also picked up some 243 heads. The goal of the car is to go 10.99 this year. I'm trying to figure out which direction I should go with the Cam. I don't want to re-stall the converter so I'm thinking about going smaller on the cam to work better with the converter.

Current thoughts:
-Go with a TSP torquer V2(my old 6spd car had this cam and I liked it a lot)
-Go down as far as a 228R
-Take suggestions on more modern cams that I don't know about?
-Stay with the MS3 and see how fast I go with the new heads and intake.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2015 | 01:33 PM
  #2  
HCI2000SS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 20
From: Howell & Fenton MI
Default

Personally I'd stay with the MS3 cam
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2015 | 04:45 PM
  #3  
Brndn59's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

Stay with the ms3
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2015 | 05:17 PM
  #4  
MMorgan9812's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Mars Hill, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
Personally I'd stay with the MS3 cam
+3
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2015 | 05:58 PM
  #5  
poltergeist 02's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
iTrader: (65)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 3
Default

I vote send the converter out. You will net a better ET with a higher stall speed then you would with a cam change.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2015 | 09:59 PM
  #6  
Kingc8r's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,565
Likes: 59
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by poltergeist 02
I vote send the converter out. You will net a better ET with a higher stall speed then you would with a cam change.
This. Theres the SNS 2, BTR 2, Streetsweeper HT....etc. Why are you against restalling?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2015 | 06:50 AM
  #7  
NJNETSFAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 603
Likes: 3
From: Royal Oak, Mi
Default

Originally Posted by Kingc8r
This. Theres the SNS 2, BTR 2, Streetsweeper HT....etc. Why are you against restalling?
Because I'm on a 10 bolt and the trans only has an HD-2 shiftkit in it. The current stall has gotten me consistently 1.61 60' times, so I believe it's a little looser than a 3500.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2015 | 07:52 AM
  #8  
Kingc8r's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,565
Likes: 59
From: SF Bay Area
Default

I see. I wish I just kept my MS3 I had and optimized that setup. I switched cams and was even more disappointed. Now my car has been sitting forever because I lost a 3-4 clutch pack and I can't decide on a setup lol. Good luck.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2015 | 08:30 AM
  #9  
thunderstruck507's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,358
Likes: 27
From: Northwest AR
Default

Are you getting the new heads ported? Stock 243 heads will not get you where you want to go without other changes. You might see 30-35rwhp real world from the heads and ported 90mm over your current setup.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2015 | 08:30 AM
  #10  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
Personally I'd stay with the MS3 cam
Yep, for that goal id look at changing the converter before the cam.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2015 | 09:55 AM
  #11  
mOtOrHeAd MiKe's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 47
From: Saskatchewan, Canada - where arguing "DA" is for the slow and weak...
Default

Keep the converter and add more gear - adjust your shift points accordingly.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2015 | 10:22 AM
  #12  
Kingc8r's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,565
Likes: 59
From: SF Bay Area
Default

It's the answer you didn't want to hear but in the end it'll be the best choice.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2015 | 10:29 AM
  #13  
thunderstruck507's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,358
Likes: 27
From: Northwest AR
Default

If he's cutting 1.61 60ft it's going to take a fairly aggressive converter to go faster there regardless of what his is rated at. Those are 60fts in line with a Yank SS4000 based on what I've seen.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2015 | 12:05 PM
  #14  
Kingc8r's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,565
Likes: 59
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Yea that's why I got rid of my SS3600 and went to a Circle D 4200 2E
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2015 | 01:10 PM
  #15  
NJNETSFAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 603
Likes: 3
From: Royal Oak, Mi
Default

Originally Posted by thunderstruck507
Are you getting the new heads ported? Stock 243 heads will not get you where you want to go without other changes. You might see 30-35rwhp real world from the heads and ported 90mm over your current setup.
Heads will stay as cast. I may get them milled slightly, but I think 10.99 is obtainable with stock 243s. The car went 11.68 on stock heads, and the bbk intake and running 23 degrees of timing. I picked up the car last year and picked up HP tuners at the same time. I was learning along the way and the tune had improvements to be made but the season ended before I could get the tune dialed in(this is assuming that I was losing some power due to being down 4-5 degrees on timing). With an optimal tune, I think the car could have ran 11.4x with the old setup.

The car already has 3.73's and I'm crossing the line at 6k as it is(I believe a converter is probably a wise choice as I'm seeing 1k rpm of slipping on the top end when you do the backwards calculation on my trap speed and FDR).

Based on the responses, I'm thinking of going to a higher stall and just keeping the cam. I realize that is probably the easiest way to get to the goal of 10.99. I wouldn't mind making it a little more difficult by going with a more streetable cam and converter though if someone has done it in the past,which is why I started this thread.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.