Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Timming Chain slop!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2015, 02:11 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
adrynalinjunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Timming Chain slop!

FYI..
I purchased a new C5R JWIS chain and just for the hell of it I but it on my LS2 sprockets that are in perfect shape...

It was as loose as my old LS2 chain!

However once I put the new Hex-a-just cloyes gears on with the JWIS chain it was nice and tight!

No slop, but not so tight that it would increase friction..

So these Cloyes gears are what get rid of the slack in the chain! not the actual chain itself!
Old 05-05-2015, 02:21 PM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Meth Sled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good to know, hopefully a brand new LS2 chain on new sprockets won't be too loose!
Old 05-05-2015, 10:23 PM
  #3  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,589
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

I went with the Rollmaster single roller set with gears. There was a little slop but a Trick Flow timing chain damper & bracket cured it.
Old 05-05-2015, 10:25 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

I am running a LS2 chain on stock 17,000 mile gears...there was a little slack so I added the Katech LS6 dampener for added protection. Keep in mind aluminum expands, so when the motor is up to temp, that slack will tighten up.
Old 05-06-2015, 10:37 AM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
RabidStreetRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Seriously, what is acceptable timing chain slack????

I have done a ton of research and i have yet to find a good answer or explanation. I am building my second GEN 3 engine, first was a 5.3 and now an LS1. With the 5.3, I used a LS2 timing set and have almost no slack with the timing chain on. The LS1 I am building came with a rollmaster double roller with low miles but it has about 1/4" of slack. What is the true answer to this, How much slack if any is acceptable?

Stuff I have read that I do not know are true and add to my confusion. Maybe someone can chime in and make or create a sticky. I see this question a lot but then i see as many different answers as I do when we discuss hydraulic lifters

THIS IS DIFFERENT OPINIONS I HAVE READ

The chain will tighten up as aluminum blocks expand more when hot
The chain will tighten up when you install and tighten the rockers
Slack is fine as long as it is not hitting the sides of the engine block
A tight chain is bad and can break when expanded from heat
road racing RPM's in the 3,400-4,500 range is the worst for stressing the chain
Too much slack can throw the timing off by 2 to 4 degrees
slack reduces engine responsiveness

I would like to use this double roller chain I have if the 1/4" of slack is acceptable, if not, then I will put on my LS2 set.

The lifters, pushrods and rockers are not installed yet, not sure if that will make a difference but heard it might
Name:  20150506_112304_zpsgxfgdws3.jpg
Views: 2499
Size:  130.4 KB

Name:  20150506_112301_zpsrqscccbe.jpg
Views: 2463
Size:  129.9 KB

Last edited by RabidStreetRacer; 05-06-2015 at 04:45 PM.
Old 05-06-2015, 04:40 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
RabidStreetRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I just installed all the lifters, pushrods and rockers. The slack remained the same, that busts the one saying that it will tighten after the valvetrain is installed, which i thought was stupid.
Old 05-06-2015, 08:39 PM
  #7  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,589
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

If the block expands enough to tighten up the timing chain, engines would have all kinds of problems from leaks to blown gaskets to pulled threads.

I can't imagine the block expands more than a few microns.
Old 05-06-2015, 11:13 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

I was told by a LS engine builder that the LS1 expands so the chain will tighten some. Just repeating what I was told. I do agree with you that it can't be much if any.
Old 05-07-2015, 11:42 AM
  #9  
TECH Addict
 
RockinWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Probably going to blow your mind how much they expand, I know they expand someplace in the .040 zone. Enough to stop cold carbon knock as the engine grows. It also has to do with distance, example If you measuring from crankshaft to cam bearing journal you may see .020 growth when hot but from deck to crankshaft journal .040. I hope this makes sense to you all.

Here is info from another site on this to figure it out exactly.

Coefficient of expansion (CoE) for metals is given in inches/inches of length/degree F (or m/m/K*), so change of length depends on the original length of the part and the temp. change.

Using these COEs: Aluminum: 13.8 x 10^-6 (millionths)
Steel: 6.4 x 10^-6
Cast Iron: 6.7 x 10^-6

A 9.00 deck height, 3.75 stroke, 6.00 steel rod engine should have these length changes for a 150F change, or from 70F to 220F operating temp:

Iron block: 9.00 x 6.7 x10^-6 x 150 = .0090 in. growth
Aluminum block: 9.00 x 13.8 x10^-6 x 150 = .0186 in. growth

Steel crank and rod: (1.875 + 6.00) x 6.4 x10^-6 x 150 = .0076 growth.
Aluminum piston with 1.125 CH: 1.125 x 13.8 x10^-6 x 150 = .0023 growth

Growth of crank, rod and piston needs to be subtracted from the block growth to determine how quench clearance is changed.

Iron block: .0090 - .0076 - .0023 = -.0009 or piston sticks up about and additional .001

Alum. block: .0186 - .0076 - .0023 = .0087 or piston is that much down in the hole.

Substitute your engine dimensions and the temp change from room temp (where engine components shoud be measured) to get specifics for your engine.
Old 05-07-2015, 01:53 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

I was told that exact same thing...thanks for confirming. It's crazy to think there is that much expansion.
Old 05-08-2015, 08:52 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
ls1 1990 VN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auckland, Nth Is, New Zealand.
Posts: 1,371
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Paul Bell
I went with the Rollmaster single roller set with gears. There was a little slop but a Trick Flow timing chain damper & bracket cured it.
The Trick Flow bracket fitted with an LS2 damper is 'NOT' a chain tensioner..... all it does is stop the chain from whipping, ie: especially during road racing
Old 05-08-2015, 09:12 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
ls1 1990 VN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Auckland, Nth Is, New Zealand.
Posts: 1,371
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Don't know how many times have to preach this,

Use the Cloyes 'hex a just' gear set with the C5R extreme duty single chain or go with the Hinson C7 chain
Old 05-08-2015, 09:18 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
patSS/00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,008
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by adrynalinjunkie
FYI..
I purchased a new C5R JWIS chain and just for the hell of it I but it on my LS2 sprockets that are in perfect shape...

It was as loose as my old LS2 chain!

However once I put the new Hex-a-just cloyes gears on with the JWIS chain it was nice and tight!

No slop, but not so tight that it would increase friction..

So these Cloyes gears are what get rid of the slack in the chain! not the actual chain itself!
I have a hex-a-just set (not installed), this makes we wonder if maybe they didn't take the aluminun thermal expansion into account when they designed it, so it ends up being too tight, with more cam bearing wear.
Old 05-08-2015, 10:21 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fredonia,WI
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

The timing chain is a pretty important piece of the puzzle and since GM designed the LS engine for 250,000 miles, I simply refuse to believe that the engineers said "Aww that's fine if it's that loose" If guys running LLSR cams are running no lash cold in order for the hot lash to be in the .008"-.010" range; I would bet the farm that between oil on the chain and thermal expansion, a room temperature slop virtually disappears when up to full temperature.
I do agree that road racing can cause additional stretch and vibrational slapping, which is why a dampener is useful but for ninety percent of driving/cruising situations.....the factory crap is just fine.
Old 05-08-2015, 10:32 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fredonia,WI
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Your iron block 5.3 hardly expands when heated and had a tight chain at room temp.
An aluminum block expands considerably when heated to the point that the main bearing clearances will open up nearly 50 percent and the deck height can grow almost .008".
Old 05-08-2015, 11:31 PM
  #16  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,589
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RockinWs6
Aluminum block: 9.00 x 13.8 x10^-6 x 150 = .0186 in. growth
Good info Rockin. I saw that same website you found that on.

This would mean that nine inches of material in an aluminum block expands .0186 in between cool and hot.

As the distance between the crank saddles and cam bore is just under three inches, the cam bore would migrate just less than .0062 inches away from the crank when hot.

My opinion is I doubt this is enough to tighten up chain slop.

Additionally, if you were "lucky" enough to have a timing chain set without any slop (nice and tight as installed) and the block expanded enough to tighten up a loose chain, this tight chain set would be too tight at operating temps. This would cause excessive wear on at least the number one cam bearing.

Last edited by Paul Bell; 05-08-2015 at 11:39 PM.
Old 05-08-2015, 11:34 PM
  #17  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,589
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1 1990 VN
The Trick Flow bracket fitted with an LS2 damper is 'NOT' a chain tensioner..... all it does is stop the chain from whipping, ie: especially during road racing
You are correct about this. The chain had a little slop in it that seemed to improve with the damper installed.

I've yanked my motor apart again. When I re-assemble it, I'll examine this a little closer.
Old 05-09-2015, 07:29 AM
  #18  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
gtotoocool1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: northern indiana
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mine tightened up after I installed the valvetrain and turned the engine over a couple of times,go figure.
the Haynes manual says up to 5/8" slack is acceptable.seems like a lot,but that's what the spec is.
FYI,i'm running a stock timing chain and cam sprocket with 60,000 miles.the crank sprocket has 160,000 miles.i have about 3/8" or so slop.car runs strong,but of course i'm cam only street car.
your fine,don't worry about it.
Old 05-09-2015, 08:01 AM
  #19  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,589
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Deck height in an aluminum block grows about .0186. (Source: https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...l#post18792394 ) At 1/3 the length, the distance between the crank & cam grows about .0062. Is this enough to significantly reduce chain slop?

I'd like to see somebody actually measure the block when cold and hot.

Chain slack should NOT be reduced after installing the valvetrain.
Old 05-09-2015, 08:07 AM
  #20  
That's MISTER MODERATOR
iTrader: (9)
 
Paul Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,589
Received 49 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

I would say 1/4 inch of slack is acceptable. Companies like Comp Cams and Cloyes offer undersized timing sets for blocks that have been line bored.


Quick Reply: Timming Chain slop!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.