Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ls1 restoration help?

Old Jul 19, 2017 | 02:26 PM
  #1  
GLs1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Washington
Default Ls1 restoration help?

Brief description: new here, first post, not even sure if I'll get a response.
But I need HELP. I'm 17 years old attempting to restore an LS1 to put into my 2004 Infiniti G35, and after that, I have plans for the body, which I'm hopping to bring the final product to SEMA. My other project is a 1977 scirocco mk1.

But back to the point.
I have a LM7 5.3 3rd gen LS1 short block from around 2001-2003
I believe I have majority of the main engine, but I'm looking for a stock parts list. Like a diagram or parts list with every part and bolt in the entire engine. So I can make sure I have everything.

Can you guys help me find a link? Book? Etc
After I clean/resurface and disassemble the engine, I plan on rebuilding it and attempting 400-500hp
But as of right now, I just need to focus on getting it restored.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 05:15 PM
  #2  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Lm7 5.3 is not ls1. ls1 is alum and 5.7l. 5.3 is cast iron and of course 5.3l. You can bore a 5.3l out to a 5.7 size but its still cast iron although cast iron is stronger.

We have a few places you can look BUT perhaps this book would help you more.

https://www.amazon.com/Build-Modify-Engines-Motorbooks-Workshop/dp/0760335435

Written by a guy at Texas Speed and Perf. Great read with good pictures.

We can help you every step of the way with parts and tech info if youd like.

Email me
Rpmspeedtech@gmail.com

Thanks and good luck!!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 06:57 PM
  #3  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,287
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Yeah, I wish people would stop referring to ALL LS engines as LS1's. As said, the LS1 was a 5.7L aluminum block put into Corvettes and Camaros from 1997 until 2004(Camaros until 2002, the last year of Gen4 Camaros). THAT'S IT.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 07:22 PM
  #4  
cookseyb's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 926
Likes: 18
From: Central Texas
Default

GTO's too
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 07:40 PM
  #5  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,287
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Originally Posted by cookseyb
GTO's too
Ooops yeah! Them too! lol Sorry!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 07:53 PM
  #6  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Dont forget cts-v also...
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 08:51 PM
  #7  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,287
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Uhhhh yep.... that too.... OK, what ELSE am I forgetting?? LOL
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 08:55 PM
  #8  
07NBSChevy's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 607
Likes: 7
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Default

You missed just a couple, G Atsma. You got the Chevy LS1 Applications tho lol.

The CTS-V never used the LS1. 2004-2005 used the LS6, and 2006-2007 used the LS2, 2008-2014 used the LSA

1997–2004 Chevrolet Corvette
1998–2002 Chevrolet Camaro
1998–2002 Pontiac Firebird Formula, Trans Am
2004-Pontiac GTO
1999–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Clubsport (VT, VX, Y Series)
1999–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Clubsport R8 (VT, VX, Y Series)
1999–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Grange (VT, VX, Y Series)
1999–2004 Holden Special Vehicles GTS (VT, VX, Y Series)
1999–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Maloo (VT, VX, Y Series)
1999–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Senator Signature (VT, VX, Y Series)
1999–2005 Holden Commodore (VT, VX, VY, VZ)
1999–2005 Holden Statesman (WH, WK, WL)
1999–2005 Holden Caprice (WH, WK, WL)
2000–2002 Holden Special Vehicles Senator 300 (VX)
2000–2002 Holden Special Vehicles Coupé GTO (VX)
2000–2002 Holden Special Vehicles Coupé GTS (VX)
2000–2002 Holden Special Vehicles SV300 (VX)
2000–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Maloo R8 (VX, Y Series)
2003–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Clubsport SE (Y Series)
2003–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Coupé LE (Y Series)
2003–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Coupé4 AWD (Y Series)
2003–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Avalanche XUV (Y Series)
2003–2004 Holden Special Vehicles Avalanche XUV AWD (Y Series)
2000–2005 Holden Ute
2001–2005 Holden Monaro CV8
2005-Holden Monaro CV8 Z
2001–2005 CSV Mondo
2001–present Mosler MT900
2006–present Elfin MS8 Streamliner
2006–present Elfin MS8 Clubman

Last edited by 07NBSChevy; Jul 19, 2017 at 09:03 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 09:03 PM
  #9  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Most here hardly reference the holdens. They have a specific forum but most dont post here on tech. Except the gto guys that wish they had a monaro lol.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 09:04 PM
  #10  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,287
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

Yeah, just a couple, huh? OK the Aussies don't count here, as they never reached our shores UNDER the HOLDEN NAME. There. Had to salvage some pride here. LOL
OK, forgot the Firebirds too! But they're just reskinned Camaros, right?
(FLAMES imminent here... EVERYONE take COVER!)
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 09:06 PM
  #11  
07NBSChevy's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 607
Likes: 7
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Default

I wish Holdens were sold in the states. I always wanted a Ute.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 09:07 PM
  #12  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,287
Likes: 3,615
From: Central Cal.
Default

I agree! Good cars, and if they had sold here, might have saved the brand from extinction.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 10:48 PM
  #13  
GLs1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Washington
Default If it's not ls1, then what is it?

[QUOTE=tech@WS6store;19679488]Lm7 5.3 is not ls1. ls1 is alum and 5.7l. 5.3 is cast iron and of course 5.3l. You can bore a 5.3l out to a 5.7 size but its still cast iron although cast iron is stronger.

Okay so if it's not Ls1 since it's a 5.3 iron block. Then what is it?
It was said to come out of a 2002 Tahoe, from my understanding is the reason it's iron. The aluminum ones were placed into cars.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 10:52 PM
  #14  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

An ls1 is 5.7 liters 350 cubic inches. it is aluminum.

A 5.3l from that truck is a cast iron 5.3l 325 cubic inch block. a 5.3 is a 5.3. you can also use its production code lm7. the production code for the 5.7 block is ls1. thats what makes them different.
They use the same stroke but the 5.3 block has a 3.780 bore size the 5.7 has a 3.898. that is what makes the cubic inch difference.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 10:57 PM
  #15  
GLs1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Washington
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
An ls1 is 5.7 liters 350 cubic inches. it is aluminum.

A 5.3l from that truck is a cast iron 5.3l 325 cubic inch block. a 5.3 is a 5.3. you can also use its production code lm7. the production code for the 5.7 block is ls1. thats what makes them different.
They use the same stroke but the 5.3 block has a 3.780 bore size the 5.7 has a 3.898. that is what makes the cubic inch difference.

Ooh okay. So mine is a LM7, not LS1. And the only difference is the cubic inch, and iron instead of aluminum?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 11:00 PM
  #16  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

In the block yes, but its a pretty big difference.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 11:07 PM
  #17  
GLs1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Washington
Default Similar power?

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
In the block yes, but its a pretty big difference.
Okay well would I still be able to obtain similar power as an ls1? Am I able to use similar parts? And if so, what kind of parts? Or should I only buy lm7 parts?

And what if I bore it out to 5.7? But let's say I keep it 5.3, would that be more fuel efficient?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 11:16 PM
  #18  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Boring the 5.3 to a 5.7 is all gain and no real drawback. All ls1 parts are interchangeable with 5.3s. They use the same rods and cranks and timing sets and bearings and oil pumps and valley covers anyway.
You cannot make as much power as an ls1 with the smaller bore, but you can make power. Making an iron 5.7 would make as much power as an ls1 could.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 11:27 PM
  #19  
GLs1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Seattle Washington
Default Same internals, what about power and fuel efficiency?

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
Boring the 5.3 to a 5.7 is all gain and no real drawback. All ls1 parts are interchangeable with 5.3s. They use the same rods and cranks and timing sets and bearings and oil pumps and valley covers anyway.
You cannot make as much power as an ls1 with the smaller bore, but you can make power. Making an iron 5.7 would make as much power as an ls1 could.
So there's no difference in parts between the lm7 and ls1?
But with the smaller bore, would I have better fuel efficiency? Just not as much power? Let's say I keep the same 5.3 bore, what would I have to get in order to make about 500hp?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2017 | 11:31 PM
  #20  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Trying for that power level the 5.3 would be no more fuel efficient than the 5.7. are you asking about crank horsepower or rear wheel? The 5.3 has dished pistons so the cr is significantly lower, youd need alot more cam to make more power. turbo or supercharger would be the quickest most fuel efficient way. Otherwise you are sacrificing hp for mpg.
The larger bore would be ALOT easier to make that goal with a smaller cam and still be ok on mpg.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.