Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Judge my planned engine build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 02:47 PM
  #1  
mikedamageinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 25
From: go get your shine box tommy
Default Judge my planned engine build

So I'm putting together a Frankenstein LS build to swap into my Toyota SUV which will weigh around 5500#. My goals are the following:

Tow a camper or car hauler, both weigh around 6000#
Simple build, "cheap", no custom cam/head work, full factory reliability, no need to swap cam springs every 5k miles, etc.
Low end torque, don't care as much about upper rpm horsepower
87 octane

My plan:

LS1 block, stock rotating assembly
LS2 cam (same as 2001 LS6)
799 heads
truck intake/injectors
full bolt ons

I have most of the parts already so I don't want to change too much but if I'd be much happier with a different cam or intake now is the time to decide. Also what size head gaskets to keep compression low enough to use 87 octane but still keep decent compression?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 02:54 PM
  #2  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,291
Likes: 3,616
From: Central Cal.
Default

That cam and intake will do a great job for you. Just make sure the valve springs will handle .525 lift.
Though you DO know you will need a custom tune to make it all work together
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 03:10 PM
  #3  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Ls2 cam wont work in ls1block without ls2 front cover cam sensor extension and 1x gear.
Youre leaving alot on the table with that cam anyway.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 03:29 PM
  #4  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,291
Likes: 3,616
From: Central Cal.
Default

True, but he was wanting to use a factory cam. Forgot about the Gen III/IV differences! DOH! The early LS6 cam is the same, but might be hard to find. I agree that there are FAR better cams out there.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 03:37 PM
  #5  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,873
From: My own internal universe
Default

Wrong cam for towing. Ask how I know.

You would do better with a cam motion stage 1 or 2 drop in truck cam. Much better. Designed for factory valve train so you would not need to worry about that stuff.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 04:41 PM
  #6  
mikedamageinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 25
From: go get your shine box tommy
Default

I am aware of the front cover and sensor situation, just thinking about the major components and how they work together. If an aftermarket cam works for towing and allows ls6 valve springs I might go for it. Cost is a factor but if it is night and day difference for towing, and again major concern being 100,000 mile valve springs must be used.

After looking at cam motion, the truck cams are almost the same specs as the ls2 and ls6. Did you tow with both?

Last edited by mikedamageinc; Nov 16, 2017 at 04:54 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 04:47 PM
  #7  
Bspeck82's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
5 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 442
Default

Would conpression not be too high for 87? 91-93 would be more feasible.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 04:47 PM
  #8  
Darth_V8r's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 1,873
From: My own internal universe
Default

Originally Posted by mikedamageinc
I am aware of the front cover and sensor situation, just thinking about the major components and how they work together. If an aftermarket cam works for towing and allows ls6 valve springs I might go for it. Cost is a factor but if it is night and day difference for towing, and again major concern being 100,000 mile valve springs must be used.
Gotcha. Cam motion drop in is still my recommendation. Will work with factory ls6 springs and will not stress the factory stuff at all. But will make a good bit more low end grunt vs the LS2 cam

http://www.cammotion.com/camshafts/t...206-210-115-5/
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 05:54 PM
  #9  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

The tsp stg1 cam and stg2 low lift will work with ls6 springs and work exactly for your purpose, but id recommend pac1218s. Ask me how i know.

On a separate note....has anyone wondered why they put such a large chamber head specifically and only on the 6.0l in heavy duty trucks?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 05:57 PM
  #10  
mikedamageinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 25
From: go get your shine box tommy
Default

Originally Posted by Bspeck82
Would conpression not be too high for 87? 91-93 would be more feasible.
I know premium would make more power but even in a standard ls1, 91 is recommended but not required, and I thought that the 799 was less compression than 243 but after another seach they are exactly the same. Either way a nice thick head gasket should drop the compression to a safe level just not sure how much.


Originally Posted by G Atsma
That cam and intake will do a great job for you. Just make sure the valve springs will handle .525 lift.
Though you DO know you will need a custom tune to make it all work together
plan on the newer blue ls6 springs good for .550 (maybe slightly higher) and Frost is my tuner, never let me down!



Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
On a separate note....has anyone wondered why they put such a large chamber head specifically and only on the 6.0l in heavy duty trucks?
no, why did they?

Last edited by mikedamageinc; Nov 17, 2017 at 06:28 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2017 | 08:17 PM
  #11  
G Atsma's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 22,291
Likes: 3,616
From: Central Cal.
Default

To keep the compression down so 87 gas can be used under high-stress situations.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 06:42 AM
  #12  
Phil coppney's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

I will jump on the wrong cam bandwagon. Need something with a powerband lower in the rpm range.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 06:54 AM
  #13  
Floader's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by tech@WS6store
The tsp stg1 cam and stg2 low lift will work with ls6 springs and work exactly for your purpose, but id recommend pac1218s. Ask me how i know.

On a separate note....has anyone wondered why they put such a large chamber head specifically and only on the 6.0l in heavy duty trucks?
The same reason the eventually put Inco exhaust valves in them with the L96, so you can flat foot it for hours at 3500rpm and not kill it?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 09:12 AM
  #14  
StealthFormula's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,798
Likes: 54
From: Skippack, PA
Default

Originally Posted by Phil coppney
I will jump on the wrong cam bandwagon. Need something with a powerband lower in the rpm range.
I agree. For towing like in this case, I would either run a stock cam or a grind made specifically to enhance the low-end torque which I assume some of the truck grinds mentioned earlier may do. The LS6 and LS2 cams make pretty large gains when stuffed into 5.3 and 6.0 truck motors but at the expense of low-end torque. There’s a hotrod mag test (link below) where they tested various cams in a 5.3. The LS2 cam in the 5.3 gained crazy power up top but lost almost 20 ft lbs of torque under 2,500rpm. I know we are talking about a 6.0 here but it appears to me that an LS6 or LS2 cam would be a very poor choice for a tow rig. I think the smartest thing may be to just run the stock cam and gear accordingly. After all, you’re looking for torque and you plan to tow 6000# with it, it’s not like you’re looking for dyno numbers or track times.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.hotro...omparison/amp/

Last edited by StealthFormula; Nov 17, 2017 at 09:20 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 09:17 AM
  #15  
pantera_efi's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 18
From: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Default Donor Engine = Escalade "rollover"

Hi Mike, I would find (my help if asked) a Salvage Title Escalade 2008 +.

I have bid/bought this type of car from a Salvage Yard.
I look for a "rollover" crash donor.
I would install the COMPLETE engine package.
I have bought this type of "crashed car" for $2155.00, the lowest won bid once.

I even sold other items from the Escalade recovering some cost.

I would like to get the ECU business for your needs as MY ECU-882C would work great in your case.

THUS, my judgement, save your cash !

Lance
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 10:54 AM
  #16  
tech@WS6store's Avatar
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 250
Default

Originally Posted by Floader
The same reason the eventually put Inco exhaust valves in them with the L96, so you can flat foot it for hours at 3500rpm and not kill it?
Gm started using a stellite coated valve (or a similar type of coating) in the gen4 engines quite a bit. As for some of the 6.0s and 6.2s they were treated to different valves and seats some times because of their commercial applications or if they were being used with cng or on hybrids.
Gm never used the lq9 in heavy duty trucks either. Curious right, as they were obviously rated for more power and could be considered the same price to manufacture.
Just some food for thought i guess
Both of those cams i mentioned will get you what you want AND are on sale for $349. So even better on the budget...but still id use the pac1218 spring.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 12:47 PM
  #17  
CAMMOTION PERF's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 507
Likes: 106
Default

Originally Posted by mikedamageinc
So I'm putting together a Frankenstein LS build to swap into my Toyota SUV which will weigh around 5500#. My goals are the following:

Tow a camper or car hauler, both weigh around 6000#
Simple build, "cheap", no custom cam/head work, full factory reliability, no need to swap cam springs every 5k miles, etc.
Low end torque, don't care as much about upper rpm horsepower
87 octane

My plan:

LS1 block, stock rotating assembly
LS2 cam (same as 2001 LS6)
799 heads
truck intake/injectors
full bolt ons

I have most of the parts already so I don't want to change too much but if I'd be much happier with a different cam or intake now is the time to decide. Also what size head gaskets to keep compression low enough to use 87 octane but still keep decent compression?
That build will work great if you advance that camshaft 4-6 degrees. Otherwise that camshaft will give up a good bit of torque under 4000 RPM compared to a stock 6 liter truck camshaft. It was designed for a light weight car with emphasis on a higher RPM range than you have planned for your truck. So, if you want to use that cam due to budget constraints, advance it 4-6 degrees and that will help a ton.

For valve springs, you can either run the GM performance valve springs or this excellent low cost beehive spring that we sell:
http://www.cammotion.com/valve-train...ve-spring-set/

If you are not comfortable using an adjustable timing set to advance the camshaft, you can use this camshaft:
http://www.cammotion.com/camshafts/t...204-212-116-4/

Last edited by CAMMOTION PERF; Nov 17, 2017 at 01:15 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 01:47 PM
  #18  
mikedamageinc's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 25
From: go get your shine box tommy
Default

Originally Posted by CAMMOTION PERF
That build will work great if you advance that camshaft 4-6 degrees. Otherwise that camshaft will give up a good bit of torque under 4000 RPM compared to a stock 6 liter truck camshaft. It was designed for a light weight car with emphasis on a higher RPM range than you have planned for your truck. So, if you want to use that cam due to budget constraints, advance it 4-6 degrees and that will help a ton.

For valve springs, you can either run the GM performance valve springs or this excellent low cost beehive spring that we sell:
http://www.cammotion.com/valve-train...ve-spring-set/

If you are not comfortable using an adjustable timing set to advance the camshaft, you can use this camshaft:
http://www.cammotion.com/camshafts/t...204-212-116-4/
Thanks for the info. What would be my results if I went with the high vs low lift stage 1 truck cam?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 02:07 PM
  #19  
Rasputin713's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default

Wow! Sounds like one heck of a project. Good Luck
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2017 | 04:48 PM
  #20  
AnotherWs6's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,670
Likes: 38
From: Westchester, NY
Default

I'd also jump on the wrong cam bandwagaon but I actually have an LS6 motor, stock except for head work, for my giant *** truck. Cost was right. It's not in yet, so we have yet to see how much I love or hate it.

I wouldn't worry about trying to use 87 though man, your giving away free power and torque right there. Compression is something that doesn't need rpm to increase power. My two cents. I had my 243's milled for my truck build.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE