LIFTERS, having a hard time finding good ones
Quote
"Do you have any other information on this entire post"
I wish I could help you more, all the info in link is from a official Hylift PDF file on Google easy to find (type in Hylift lifter tech catalog pdf) the highlight part and link at bottom of the post your refering to ie the dyno result was something extra I added. I think the problem is that most don't even know the the Hylift Johnson 2148 SE is available and don't know what the SE designation means. That's why I have been posting about it here.
It's known that any slow leak down lifter can result in more power than standard leak down rate lifter if there is too much pressure from the spring for the lifter to handle whether it be the reasonably priced Hylift Johnson 2148 SE lifter or the much more expensive Johnson 2110 lifter (note not same company).
"Do you have any other information on this entire post"
I wish I could help you more, all the info in link is from a official Hylift PDF file on Google easy to find (type in Hylift lifter tech catalog pdf) the highlight part and link at bottom of the post your refering to ie the dyno result was something extra I added. I think the problem is that most don't even know the the Hylift Johnson 2148 SE is available and don't know what the SE designation means. That's why I have been posting about it here.
It's known that any slow leak down lifter can result in more power than standard leak down rate lifter if there is too much pressure from the spring for the lifter to handle whether it be the reasonably priced Hylift Johnson 2148 SE lifter or the much more expensive Johnson 2110 lifter (note not same company).
Last edited by TimsLS1; Dec 18, 2019 at 06:41 PM.
I've been talking to Texas Speed and they have been recommending the Johnson Hylift lifters. They said they were made in Minnesota I asked about using the Johnson 2110 lifters and they said it was overkill and they recommended the J Hylift ones which was a shocker. I was originally thrown because there is little to no information on them. They are different Johnson companies so don't let the names confuse you.
Looks like I am dropping $200 on the Morels as I am not chancing it with these Hylifts. Maybe the slow leakdown version Hylifts are better quality, but I am not looking to spend that much money right now, or roll the dice on them.
Hylift Johnson acknowledge the standard LS lifter 2148 (not slow leak down) will collapse the lifter used with around 390 lbs PAC dual springs like the LS7 lifters they aren't designed for this. Interesting that Brian Tooley for BTR says they have had about 20% issue rate with Morel 5206 lifters compared to 1% for there slow leak down lifters.
Hylift Johnson acknowledge the standard LS lifter 2148 (not slow leak down) will collapse the lifter used with around 390 lbs PAC dual springs like the LS7 lifters they aren't designed for this. Interesting that Brian Tooley for BTR says they have had about 20% issue rate with Morel 5206 lifters compared to 1% for there slow leak down lifters.
that thread was for 2014. Things haven’t changed in 5 years?
I'm torn on this as well. I'm getting ready to put a 233/240 cam with .660" PAC springs on ported 243 heads in my '02 TA. The car only has 21K miles on it. I asked TSP if I needed to replace my lifters and they replied no. Never the less, I'm still worried about it. I don't ever want to have to pull these heads again. Should I eliminate doubt and "waste" $400 on a set of Johnson 2110 lifters?
Quote "That thread was for 2014. Things haven’t changed in 5 years?"
I don't know if they have changed since then, 20% for the Morels is high.
I wonder if engine oil carbon and sludge would effect the finer tolerances in a slow leak down lifter more that a standard one as engine oil contamination is recognised as a major cause of lifter failure? I have had success once with engine oil flush quietening my stock LS1 lifters a few years ago, there are also lifter free additives available. Makes me think clean oil is important with lifters.
I don't know if they have changed since then, 20% for the Morels is high.
I wonder if engine oil carbon and sludge would effect the finer tolerances in a slow leak down lifter more that a standard one as engine oil contamination is recognised as a major cause of lifter failure? I have had success once with engine oil flush quietening my stock LS1 lifters a few years ago, there are also lifter free additives available. Makes me think clean oil is important with lifters.
Last edited by TimsLS1; Jan 19, 2020 at 08:27 PM.
Hylift Johnson acknowledge the standard LS lifter 2148 (not slow leak down) will collapse the lifter used with around 390 lbs PAC dual springs like the LS7 lifters they aren't designed for this. Interesting that Brian Tooley for BTR says they have had about 20% issue rate with Morel 5206 lifters compared to 1% for there slow leak down lifters.
what I don’t understand is they cut out the lifter with a 1% rate but didn’t cut out the 20% failure rate lifter. At least that’s what it sounds like. Sounds like some fraggle naggle bs to me.
He doesnt say either way about what he did with the Morels, he probably didn't see it as relevant as the thread was about slow leak down lifters specifically (re title)
Last edited by TimsLS1; Jan 19, 2020 at 08:28 PM.
I'm torn on this as well. I'm getting ready to put a 233/240 cam with .660" PAC springs on ported 243 heads in my '02 TA. The car only has 21K miles on it. I asked TSP if I needed to replace my lifters and they replied no. Never the less, I'm still worried about it. I don't ever want to have to pull these heads again. Should I eliminate doubt and "waste" $400 on a set of Johnson 2110 lifters?
Here is a quote from Hylift to me when I asked what was suitable for my dual PAC .660 springs with .390 lbs at max lift on .590 valve lift 220 228 110 cam reving to 6800 rpm.
With those spring & cam numbers you are going to want the 2148SE, they will work perfectly for your setup.
I have attached a photo of 2148 vs 2148SE, they use the same casting material.
Notable difference is the internals being tighter, “c” clip retainer , & black oxide body on the 2148SE.
Theyre good up to 160 lbs of seat pressure & they will perform up to 6800 rpms with your cam setup.
Hope this helps & have a great day.
Thanks ,
Dave Ewert
Hy-Lift Johnson Co.
800-441-1400 x 611
I have attached a photo of 2148 vs 2148SE, they use the same casting material.
Notable difference is the internals being tighter, “c” clip retainer , & black oxide body on the 2148SE.
Theyre good up to 160 lbs of seat pressure & they will perform up to 6800 rpms with your cam setup.
Hope this helps & have a great day.
Thanks ,
Dave Ewert
Hy-Lift Johnson Co.
800-441-1400 x 611
Last edited by TimsLS1; Jan 20, 2020 at 05:28 PM.
Is that for 16 of the 2148 SE? Thats a great price!
Here is a video showing the USA Hylift Johnson factory assembly line what impressed was it shows quality control re precise measurement and those few that don't meat the required standard.
Here is a video showing the USA Hylift Johnson factory assembly line what impressed was it shows quality control re precise measurement and those few that don't meat the required standard.
I ended up using the lifters from Thompson Motorsports. They told me they were similar to the LS7s but made to custom spec by Eaton. I am not sure on the exact testing but Dustin told me they have seen 8k in a few builds. I just did the swap a couple weeks ago and they are quiet enough. Can't speak to them long-term, but we shall see over the next few years.
I just talked to my guy at the local engine parts warehouse. He told me he sells the Elgin ls7 spec lifters and never had one come back or have a problem. He said he sells over 60 a day. I did come across one failure on this forum, however, the question as asked if it rotated but the poster never replied. So I dont know if that was the cause. I can get these lifters for $120 a set and Elgin has been known to good quality stuff for low cost. Any one else have any issues?
anyone run the rhoades? I read mixed reviews. I just talked to an older fellow I work with who had some in one of his old hot rods and he had nothing bad to say and said they weren’t noisy. I mean an ls already sounds like a sewing machine as it is. Then I read where one guy claims that ls1’s after 2001 came with rhoades type lifters on the exhaust lobes. I could not confirm this.
anyone run the rhoades? I read mixed reviews. I just talked to an older fellow I work with who had some in one of his old hot rods and he had nothing bad to say and said they weren’t noisy. I mean an ls already sounds like a sewing machine as it is. Then I read where one guy claims that ls1’s after 2001 came with rhoades type lifters on the exhaust lobes. I could not confirm this.









