Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Help me pick a cam. 6.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2022, 05:21 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Alwhite00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
Received 42 Likes on 26 Posts

Default Help me pick a cam. 6.0

I have a iron 6.0 in my 67 chevelle. 4L60 - 9" 3:50

I have ported 853 heads, LS6 cam, LS6 springs,shorty headers. I just got back from a 1,700 mile trip and the car works great. Generic tune in a stock ECM. It got 20.7mpg on the trip that included numerous 75mph freeway runs for hours on end and mountain driving. It will get 23+ at 60.

. Anyways, anyone have good cam recommendations ? I'm not looking for anything radical as I actually drive this thing but wouldn't mind a bit more power but don't want to loose on the mpg. I know I'm asking a lot.

Just wanted to see if I could find a good winter project. (Ok, the main reason is my buddies new Skat Pack Challenger pulls on me a bit and I want to keep him in line. &#128513
Old 11-01-2022, 05:29 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,127
Received 3,110 Likes on 2,425 Posts
Default

Which LS6 cam?? There are two, early (204/211, .525/.525, 116) and late (204/218,.555/.551, 117.5)
Cam Motion has their LS1 Stage 1 (210/216, .553/.553, 116+3) which would give a bit of a kick without wrecking your present smooth characteristics.
Old 11-01-2022, 05:39 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Alwhite00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
Received 42 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by G Atsma
Which LS6 cam?? There are two, early (204/211, .525/.525, 116) and late (204/218,.555/.551, 117.5)
Cam Motion has their LS1 Stage 1 (210/216, .553/.553, 116+3) which would give a bit of a kick without wrecking your present smooth characteristics.
very good question that I don't know the answer to. I may call summit and see if they have it on file.
Old 11-01-2022, 05:47 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,127
Received 3,110 Likes on 2,425 Posts
Default

On your future cam, is a bit of lope allowed? If so, the doors open to a bunch more cams.
Cam Motion, Texas Speed, and Summit have some great cams that would fit your situation pretty well.
Old 11-01-2022, 06:24 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
 
jetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Dade City, Fl.
Posts: 1,165
Received 217 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Call and talk to each of the sponsors G Atsma mentioned and tell them what you want out of a cam swap. They might even suggest a custom cam instead of an off the shelf
I have a LQ9 with TEA 243 heads milled Smallwood Racing Development cam 228-232 112+2 4l60e 342:1 rear swapped in a "71 RS Camaro. I haven't been on a long ride yet. Combined driving mpg with no interstate driving it gets 18mpg. I was hoping for a little better mpg but it runs extremely strong. I also have an issue with keeping my foot out of it
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (11-01-2022)
Old 11-01-2022, 06:25 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,591
Received 1,444 Likes on 1,002 Posts

Default

BTR-gen-iii-iv-ls-Truck-Norris-Cam would be worth a look. Has the stock cam bottom end torque plus a nice upper rpm gain.

212/22x .552/.552 107


See BTR's website for more details.


FWIW - The best bang for the buck performance improvement for your 67 Chevelle would be a higher than stock stall converter. Yank converters are very popular will drive practically stock. Probably a 3200SS or 3600SS. They are lock up converters and won't hurt highway gas mileage. (I have a 3200 Yank TH400 in my 72 Vette w/3.08 gear and can get 19 mpg without lock up on interstate.)

Best of the best would be to also do a cam for maximum rewards 😃 😊 The aftermarket stall will allow more flexibility in cam selection.

For a 6.0, personally I'd be looking at least at a Summit Ghost Cam It's a proven cam and would be best with ~2500 to 2800+ of aftermarket stall.

222/233 Stage 1 Pro LS Ghost Cam. 222/233 115+3, .600/.575 Lift, Ultimate Stealth Cam




Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; 11-02-2022 at 08:14 AM.
The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (11-01-2022)
Old 11-01-2022, 06:34 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
 
jetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Dade City, Fl.
Posts: 1,165
Received 217 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

BTW SRD designed the cam and Cam Motion manufactured it
Old 11-01-2022, 08:17 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Alwhite00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
Received 42 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Thanks for the input so far now I have something to chew on. I'm not opposed to a torque converter. I just don't want to throw the mpg in the toilet but I drive this thing 5k a year and it adds up. I appreciate everyone's suggestions so far. Thank you. Keep them coming.
Old 11-02-2022, 01:09 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
G Atsma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Central Cal.
Posts: 21,127
Received 3,110 Likes on 2,425 Posts
Default

You won't lose highway mileage as the lockup converter will eliminate the slippage at highway speeds.
In-town driving, however, WILL be affected.
The following users liked this post:
madmike9396 (11-02-2022)
Old 11-02-2022, 04:37 AM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (29)
 
madmike9396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,380
Received 205 Likes on 124 Posts

Default

What intake are you currently running?

You could always upgrade the intake and heads for more power since you like how it drives now.

I'm would just take some time and call around. see who actually wants to deal with you and not just throw some random off the shelf cam at you.

The following users liked this post:
G Atsma (11-02-2022)
Old 11-02-2022, 06:42 AM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
 
68Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 685
Received 356 Likes on 243 Posts

Default

Since your heads are ported, you can certainly benefit from a cam with more lift. I like @99 Black Bird T/As suggestion of Ghost cam and a torque convertor. I would also swap the shorty headers for long tubes.which will improve power across the entire rpm band, and won't hurt gas mileage (may even mitigate some mpg loss from other changes).
The following users liked this post:
99 Black Bird T/A (11-02-2022)
Old 11-02-2022, 06:43 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Alwhite00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
Received 42 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

I'm running ported 853 heads and a LS2 intake. I realize the intake isn't the best but what I went with.
Old 11-02-2022, 08:26 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,591
Received 1,444 Likes on 1,002 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Alwhite00
I'm running ported 853 heads and a LS2 intake. I realize the intake isn't the best but what I went with.
​​​As @68Formula mentioned long tune headers will definitely help vs shorties. The long tubes will help optimize additional mod's.

The stock LS2 intake is a sad story. It's a 90mm snout intake that looks so promising but in dyno testing failed to out power the older stock 78mm snout LS6 intake manifold. A Fast 92 or 102 (ideally ported by Mamo etc) will definitely get some very nice overall gains.

Upgrading to 1 3/4 long tube heads, a Fast 92, a 222/233 Ghost Cam and a Yank 3600SS would awaken a beast of a car when the gas pedal was down but still drive nice and civil with a good tune👍.
The following 2 users liked this post by 99 Black Bird T/A:
68Formula (11-02-2022), Alwhite00 (11-03-2022)
Old 11-02-2022, 09:09 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
 
jetech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Dade City, Fl.
Posts: 1,165
Received 217 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Alwhite you mentioned your buddy pulls on you a little. Is that from a stand stop or dig? A 3200-3600 stall will improve your chances of beating him . I forgot to mention in my prior post I'm running a Yank spec'd by David for my car. yank PAS3400. I absolutely love it. I locks up super tight and hard
Old 11-03-2022, 05:52 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Alwhite00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
Received 42 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jetech
Alwhite you mentioned your buddy pulls on you a little. Is that from a stand stop or dig? A 3200-3600 stall will improve your chances of beating him . I forgot to mention in my prior post I'm running a Yank spec'd by David for my car. yank PAS3400. I absolutely love it. I locks up super tight and hard
I think I could take him from a standing start as he only has 245 tires that will not hook up and my car hooks up great. It's the 30mph roll ons I have trouble with. Lol
Old 11-03-2022, 05:59 AM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Alwhite00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
Received 42 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
​​​As @68Formula mentioned long tune headers will definitely help vs shorties. The long tubes will help optimize additional mod's.

The stock LS2 intake is a sad story. It's a 90mm snout intake that looks so promising but in dyno testing failed to out power the older stock 78mm snout LS6 intake manifold. A Fast 92 or 102 (ideally ported by Mamo etc) will definitely get some very nice overall gains.

Upgrading to 1 3/4 long tube heads, a Fast 92, a 222/233 Ghost Cam and a Yank 3600SS would awaken a beast of a car when the gas pedal was down but still drive nice and civil with a good tune👍.
I got the intake, rails, injectors and a 3-4 adapter for $200 so at the time it worked and I like how the Corvette coil covers work so I went with it. It drives great and gets great mpg. Just looking for a bit more.

i did try a 90mm TB and it was definitely faster but had the normal cheap TB issues. Whistling, fast idle speed. When you were on the gas it was great but driveability suffered so I went back to the truckTB
Old 11-03-2022, 06:18 AM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,591
Received 1,444 Likes on 1,002 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Alwhite00
I got the intake, rails, injectors and a 3-4 adapter for $200 so at the time it worked and I like how the Corvette coil covers work so I went with it. It drives great and gets great mpg. Just looking for a bit more.

i did try a 90mm TB and it was definitely faster but had the normal cheap TB issues. Whistling, fast idle speed. When you were on the gas it was great but driveability suffered so I went back to the truckTB
The stock truck intake is a pretty good intake and sounds like the better intake vs the LS2 intake. 20-ls1-intake-manifolds-tested

Agreed, there's definitely a lot of cheap junk throttle bodies on the internet available. The Nick Williams is excellent but pretty expensive.

If you later decide to get a TBSS or Fast 92/102 maybe this can help with finding the new TB.

WARR Performance makes an excellent quality throttle body equal in quality that performs equal to a Nick Williams for less than half the cost. My tuner was happy with the quality of the WARR TB as well.

WARR Performance- 92mm & 102mm Throttle Body



My 99T/A & 91 RS have Nick Williams TB's and my 02 Z28 has a Warr TB, speaking from experience with both products. The TB sensors have to be moved over to the WARR or Summit has new ones for like ~$80.
The following users liked this post:
madmike9396 (11-03-2022)
Old 11-03-2022, 10:05 AM
  #18  
TECH Regular
 
Haggar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 420
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts

Default

So, let's say you've got your trans/converter/gears where you want them.

To get more power, without hurting fuel efficiency, I would look at:

Get your compression ratio up. Not sure which 6.0 / pistons you have, or where your head CCs are, but in general, higher compression will gain power while maintaining or gaining efficiency.

Improved heads. Again, could depend on exactly how good the ported LS1 heads are, maybe nothing to gain here. Ported/milled 243s, Ported/milled 5.3 heads, or aftermarket may improve flow as get the compression ratio up.

Improved intake. Pretty much *Anything* is better than an LS2 factory intake. A Dorman replacement LS2 intake would be a great direct bolt in, but they got crazy in price lately. An LS6 would be find. If you can clear it, a TBSS manifold is a great budget option, and the best you can get in a factory intake.

Cam... likely something in the 210-220 range on the intake. I would talk directly with someone like Brian Tooley Racing, who is doing a lot of development lately on these small cams. The latest stuff I've seen from them on Richard Holdener's youtube channel is a little different mindset, with larger intake/exhaust splits than cams from a few years ago, showing some good results of adding high end without hurting the low end.

Tuning.. once you get it all together, get a great tune, someone who knows how to tune the cruise region, injector angles, etc. Many tuners are focused on power first and drivability second, and efficiency is not always in the conversation.

On the throttle body, I run a WARR 92mm on my LQ4, and their 102mm on my 403" LS2. I have no issues with either in several years. I have no issues getting idle speeds good. I do get some whistling on my 92mm. On my 102, I ported the idle passage and its not so loud. I will pull the 92 and port that one someday.

For reference, I run a 223/231 with a lot of lift (0.637/0.617) and aggressive ramps in my 6.0. (LQ4, stock c.r., CNC'd heads, TBSS intake, long tubes) It has a small amount of lope to it, but drives like stock with my Yank PT3200. I would guess you want a little less duration. My mileage isn't great, but its in a lifted GMC Jimmy 4wd, and I only do city driving.
Old 11-03-2022, 10:55 AM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (29)
 
madmike9396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,380
Received 205 Likes on 124 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
The stock truck intake is a pretty good intake and sounds like the better intake vs the LS2 intake. 20-ls1-intake-manifolds-tested

Agreed, there's definitely a lot of cheap junk throttle bodies on the internet available. The Nick Williams is excellent but pretty expensive.

If you later decide to get a TBSS or Fast 92/102 maybe this can help with finding the new TB.

WARR Performance makes an excellent quality throttle body equal in quality that performs equal to a Nick Williams for less than half the cost. My tuner was happy with the quality of the WARR TB as well.

WARR Performance- 92mm & 102mm Throttle Body



My 99T/A & 91 RS have Nick Williams TB's and my 02 Z28 has a Warr TB, speaking from experience with both products. The TB sensors have to be moved over to the WARR or Summit has new ones for like ~$80.
I'm running a Warr tb. 0 issues
Old 11-04-2022, 08:22 AM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Alwhite00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 635
Received 42 Likes on 26 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Haggar
So, let's say you've got your trans/converter/gears where you want them.

To get more power, without hurting fuel efficiency, I would look at:

Get your compression ratio up. Not sure which 6.0 / pistons you have, or where your head CCs are, but in general, higher compression will gain power while maintaining or gaining efficiency.

Improved heads. Again, could depend on exactly how good the ported LS1 heads are, maybe nothing to gain here. Ported/milled 243s, Ported/milled 5.3 heads, or aftermarket may improve flow as get the compression ratio up.

Improved intake. Pretty much *Anything* is better than an LS2 factory intake. A Dorman replacement LS2 intake would be a great direct bolt in, but they got crazy in price lately. An LS6 would be find. If you can clear it, a TBSS manifold is a great budget option, and the best you can get in a factory intake.

Cam... likely something in the 210-220 range on the intake. I would talk directly with someone like Brian Tooley Racing, who is doing a lot of development lately on these small cams. The latest stuff I've seen from them on Richard Holdener's youtube channel is a little different mindset, with larger intake/exhaust splits than cams from a few years ago, showing some good results of adding high end without hurting the low end.

Tuning.. once you get it all together, get a great tune, someone who knows how to tune the cruise region, injector angles, etc. Many tuners are focused on power first and drivability second, and efficiency is not always in the conversation.

On the throttle body, I run a WARR 92mm on my LQ4, and their 102mm on my 403" LS2. I have no issues with either in several years. I have no issues getting idle speeds good. I do get some whistling on my 92mm. On my 102, I ported the idle passage and its not so loud. I will pull the 92 and port that one someday.

For reference, I run a 223/231 with a lot of lift (0.637/0.617) and aggressive ramps in my 6.0. (LQ4, stock c.r., CNC'd heads, TBSS intake, long tubes) It has a small amount of lope to it, but drives like stock with my Yank PT3200. I would guess you want a little less duration. My mileage isn't great, but its in a lifted GMC Jimmy 4wd, and I only do city driving.

thank you


Quick Reply: Help me pick a cam. 6.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM.