LS1 vs. Cobra motor?
Is it a better bang for the buck?
Can it hold more horsepower on stock bottom end?
You throw a procharger on an LS1, or on a Cobra, which is better?
I know this is also a useless debate, but they really get agrivated when I say things. I do love fords as well, but you know when it comes down to 1v1 we gotta choose GM. I just want a better argument, any other reasons you have would be great.
TIA
Last edited by GMCVT; Mar 7, 2005 at 12:40 PM.
That being said Ford did the right thing by putting forged internals into the Cobra engine. I only wish GM had done the same with the LS1.
Last edited by C5 Purple Haze; Mar 5, 2005 at 10:37 PM.
4.6 DOHC vs 5.7 OHV, there not really comparable in hindsight.
Last edited by jrp; Mar 6, 2005 at 04:10 PM.
A cobra is very cheap to mod fast! You can go 10s for relatively cheap.
But if your trying to go REAL fast and when big money comes in to account I beleive the LSX series motors are definetly superior.A turbo lsx cant be touched!
Or a forged with a big shot motor cant be touched.
Or a forged with a procharger cant be touched.
See what Im saying.
No replacement for displacement!
look at the '05 mustang 4.6 3-valve engines...ford built them, and they are making 40 hp less than the are rated at....LOL. supposedly a head problem.... ahh whateva. they are a great engine though. but its still a ford.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Is it a better bang for the buck?
Can it hold more horsepower on stock bottom end?
You throw a procharger on an LS1, or on a Cobra, which is better?
I know this is also a useless debate, but they really get agrivated when I say things. I do love fords as well, but you know when it comes down to 1v1 we gotta choose GM. I just want a better argument, any other reasons you have would be great.
TIA
will allways be one step ahead of ford in engine design and biulding.Let see me a new ford do 400hp with a cam only useing new ford pony and by the way thanks ford for byeting are ls1 intake and now they whant to do their motors all aluminuem like ls1's since 1997.That's a big *** step behind GM ,born a GM man will die a GM man
will allways be one step ahead of ford in engine design and biulding.Let see me a new ford do 400hp with a cam only useing new ford pony and by the way thanks ford for byeting are ls1 intake and now they whant to do their motors all aluminuem like ls1's since 1997.That's a big *** step behind GM ,born a GM man will die a GM man 
1-351 Cleveland had in it's glory days more hp potential than SBC 350
2- A cammer 427 was more advanced than the Chev (except for the ZL1 427, but never really a production)
3- Cubes for cubes, I've seen special editions 351 Boss (96 or 97 can't remember) and back then had tremendeous potential.
4- The pre 95 5.0 ruled to the point FORD detuned for insurance lawsuits reasons.
So I wouldn't knock Ford motors as they have proved time and time again, they are contenders for sure.
Now Chevy is playing catch up with the Z06 and the target is the GT40 and Viper.
definately we will all agree that stopping F-Body productions was a retro step of at least 10 years and a major snafu on the GM Mgmt. part.
Ford are rivals and my sworn ennemies, I enjoy killing them and bitterly accept defeat when, on occasions, it is handed to me.
They are very, very durable, and getting cheaper to mod by the day. A wonderfully designed engine all the way around.The mod motors is friggen' HUGE by comparison and also very heavy. No doubt they can make big hp for not much money since they come with forged internals and a blower. But IMO Ford absolutely HAD to send them out this way since they couldn't run the #'s any other way. Unfortunately this made them expensive to buy, complex to work on, and they require much more hp than an LS1 car to run the same #'s since they are so heavy.
I do still respect them for what they are and appreciate the fact that Ford stepped up to the plate instead of continuing on with the anemic GT as their performance flagship. I just greatly prefer the LS1's overall package.


