Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2002 | 05:19 PM
  #1  
10secondZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 722
Likes: 1
From: Lake mary, (Orlando) FL
Default anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

ok over christmas I have decided to go with TEA stage II heads along with my new 224*/227* .563"/.569" 114 lsa cam..just wondering if anyone has had any of these springs break? I need good reliability and they sound up to par..but need some reasurance <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> thanks,

carter
Old 12-26-2002 | 05:51 PM
  #2  
GODUCKS's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Clackamas, Or
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

Never heard of a problem with them. There soild! Enjoy your new heads...
Old 12-27-2002 | 01:54 AM
  #3  
10secondZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 722
Likes: 1
From: Lake mary, (Orlando) FL
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

sweet!don't all TEA stage 2's come with these springs anyways? or is it 947's? lol i dont remember thanks again..anyone else heard of any problems with either 947's or 987's? thanks <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
carter
Old 12-27-2002 | 01:56 AM
  #4  
2000RATA's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 2
From: KS
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

I have run the 987's personally and have had no trouble.
Old 12-27-2002 | 10:48 AM
  #5  
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,604
Likes: 1,456
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

My TEA 5.3 Stage 2's came with the dual 987 springs.

I've heard of ONE 987 breaking in like FOUR years. The 987 has FAR fewer issues than 941's, 918's or REV-1116's etc.

SRP tested my 987's to make sure they were up to the task of SRP's 224 custom cam with XE-R lobes. All the 987 springs were right on the money. TEA had set the springs up exactly as they should be height wise and all the springs were good.
Old 12-27-2002 | 10:59 AM
  #6  
NoGo's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 48
From: Mass
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

Never had or heard of a problem with them. Great spring IMO.

I will be taking mine off and haveing them sent to be analyzed here in the next week or so. I will post the results of how the spring rigidity has held up.
Old 12-27-2002 | 02:04 PM
  #7  
10secondZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 722
Likes: 1
From: Lake mary, (Orlando) FL
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

sweet!
thank's guys, I really needed the boost in confidence..now im ready to go! thank's again,

carter
Old 12-28-2002 | 03:43 PM
  #8  
wizkid's Avatar
Install Director
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

MY TEA Stage 1 heads came with the 987 springs. TEA does not mess around and sells proven go-fast stuff for a great price. A solid setup for sure. If you pull the heads, it is a wise investment to have your heads done so a larger diamter spring (1.440") can be installed.

Eric
Old 12-28-2002 | 10:11 PM
  #9  
LS1x2's Avatar
Formerly 4mulaJoe
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 0
From: hou
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

ttt
I'm watching this one closely. Broke a 918 and am thinking of switchin to these. It seems that even if you break one these chances are it will break in a way that it does not drop the valve. In that case it is only a nuisance and not such a big deal.
Old 12-29-2002 | 09:18 AM
  #10  
Samba242's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: North Royalton, Ohio
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

CC 987s require the heads to be machined don't they? I have been told that they don't and somebody at Thunder told me they do.
Old 12-29-2002 | 09:45 AM
  #11  
AllCammedUp's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Shelbyville, KY
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

The 5.7L and 4.8/5.3L heads do have to be machined to accept a 1.440" OD dual-spring, such as the 987 (not sure about the 6.0L head, though - maybe someone with some experience with those heads can chime in, but I bet they are the same as the 5.xL heads).

As others have mentioned before in this thread, TEA uses the 987's and does an excellent job with them. My TEA Stage II 5.3L heads were set up with them, and they have been rock-solid so far. I don't think you can go wrong w/ the double-spring as long as you've done your homework and have everything else to complement the setup.

Good luck!
Old 12-30-2002 | 12:40 AM
  #12  
LS1x2's Avatar
Formerly 4mulaJoe
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 0
From: hou
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

I thought the 987's were the doubles that didn't require any machining? If not, which ones don't?
Old 12-30-2002 | 03:58 PM
  #13  
Q's Avatar
Q
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

Joe...If i'm not mistaken..the REV springs are the dual ones that don't require any modification of the heads.
Old 12-30-2002 | 06:33 PM
  #14  
2000RATA's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 2
From: KS
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

Yes the head must be machined. And the 987 is a daul coil spring.
Old 02-04-2003 | 03:21 PM
  #15  
horist's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,036
Likes: 1
From: Lake Zurich, IL
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by NoGo:
<strong> Never had or heard of a problem with them. Great spring IMO.

I will be taking mine off and haveing them sent to be analyzed here in the next week or so. I will post the results of how the spring rigidity has held up. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Any update on this? <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[driving]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_driving3.gif" />
Old 02-04-2003 | 05:45 PM
  #16  
NoGo's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 48
From: Mass
Default Re: anyone had bad luck with comp 987 dual springs??

Yup.

I didn't get a printout of all the springs like I had asked, but each one of the springs still exhibited the advertised seat pressures within a couple lb's (I don't have the sheet infront of me <img border="0" title="" alt="[Embarrassed]" src="gr_emb.gif" /> ).

This is after road racing / drag racing / nitrous abuse on a 226/226 112 .554 cam for over a year.

Good Spring <img border="0" alt="[worship]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.