Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
#1
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
Not sure if I will use it for anything, but I picked up a 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke) with only 500 miles on it. What is a 3.900 or 3.910 bore x 3.27 stroke?
#2
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Pro Stock John:
<strong> Not sure if I will use it for anything, but I picked up a 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke) with only 500 miles on it. What is a 3.900 or 3.910 bore x 3.27 stroke? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I get 312.5 cubic inches. Do I win a cookie or something? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
<strong> Not sure if I will use it for anything, but I picked up a 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke) with only 500 miles on it. What is a 3.900 or 3.910 bore x 3.27 stroke? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I get 312.5 cubic inches. Do I win a cookie or something? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
#4
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
One of those cookies that is half white frosting and half black frosting... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
#5
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
Well, at least it's not a cookie that looks like this:
<img border="0" alt="[rainbow]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_rainbow.gif" />
<img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" />
<img border="0" alt="[rainbow]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_rainbow.gif" />
<img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" />
#6
TECH Addict
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: as far away from Koonerville as humanly possible
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
Ought to make a good boat anchor. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" />
Trending Topics
#8
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
Right now it's a great box to put my feet on while I'm at work. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
#10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
10,000RPM would be kinda kick ***. Do it on the side as a project engine, not your main prioity, but something to do on the side when its raining outside <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
#11
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
I also get 314.11" using a different method.
Why is it that a year or so ago when I suggested a big bore small stroke motor that equalled the stock 346" I was told it was a waste of time, and that the larger cubes would always win? Even if the short stroke long rod motor could rev to 10K.
Now there seems to be some folks interested <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> . <img border="0" alt="[bang head]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_banghead.gif" />
FYI a 4.1" bore and the 3.27" crank you have is is 345.37". <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" /> And you could probably stuff a custom made 6.5" connecting rod in there. <img border="0" alt="[evil]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_devil.gif" />
Why is it that a year or so ago when I suggested a big bore small stroke motor that equalled the stock 346" I was told it was a waste of time, and that the larger cubes would always win? Even if the short stroke long rod motor could rev to 10K.
Now there seems to be some folks interested <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> . <img border="0" alt="[bang head]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_banghead.gif" />
FYI a 4.1" bore and the 3.27" crank you have is is 345.37". <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" /> And you could probably stuff a custom made 6.5" connecting rod in there. <img border="0" alt="[evil]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_devil.gif" />
#12
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
Why? Because someoen once said hp sells cars, torque wins races. If your gonan do an overbore, leave the stock crank in there and have a 390 somthin motor <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Would be neat, but i couldnt justify spedning all the money for a 346 and having stock parts in it.
Would be neat, but i couldnt justify spedning all the money for a 346 and having stock parts in it.
#13
TECH Fanatic
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Pro Stock John:
<strong> Not sure if I will use it for anything, but I picked up a 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke) with only 500 miles on it. What is a 3.900 or 3.910 bore x 3.27 stroke? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Displacement = bore x bore x stroke x # of cylinders x .7854
3.91 x 3.91 x 3.27 x 8 x .7854 = 314.1
The .7854 is the little square of numbers at the top left of the keypad. Easy memory trick.
<strong> Not sure if I will use it for anything, but I picked up a 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke) with only 500 miles on it. What is a 3.900 or 3.910 bore x 3.27 stroke? </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Displacement = bore x bore x stroke x # of cylinders x .7854
3.91 x 3.91 x 3.27 x 8 x .7854 = 314.1
The .7854 is the little square of numbers at the top left of the keypad. Easy memory trick.
#14
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Albuquerque NM - The Land of 8000ft DA
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
Not to high jack this thread but I was making a point that Supras were high way killers because
1. They make power because of boost at higher rpms
2. They can spin up to 8Krpm.
While your shifting at 6k they still have some gear left and and pull on you while your shifing (assuming both manuals)and thier still making power WAY up at the top.
If you can set this up right you could be making power above 7K rpm in N/A form and tell them your faster from a roll. This would be the look on thier faces before=> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> after=> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
1. They make power because of boost at higher rpms
2. They can spin up to 8Krpm.
While your shifting at 6k they still have some gear left and and pull on you while your shifing (assuming both manuals)and thier still making power WAY up at the top.
If you can set this up right you could be making power above 7K rpm in N/A form and tell them your faster from a roll. This would be the look on thier faces before=> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Roll Eyes]" src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" /> after=> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Frown]" src="gr_sad.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
#15
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Bought a stock 4.8 crank (3.27 stroke)
I forgot what car mag (car craft?)did this a while ago, but they were trying to make a high mpg high horsepower car, and they ended up with a 312cid engine with a blower on it. Made something like 600+hp and got 20+mpg on the interstate with a richmond m6. Im sure thats not comparing apples to apples since they were using old style SB stuff, but it was a very neat buildup.
I wonder what a short stroke, small displacement, high revving turbo motor would be like.
I wonder what a short stroke, small displacement, high revving turbo motor would be like.