Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Now I'm second-guessing my cam choice...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2006, 10:32 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
KrisR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Now I'm second-guessing my cam choice...



Well, I have a brand-new TSP 233/239 sitting in a box waiting until spring to go into my '02 Z06. I did some research before I purchased it and it seemed like a 'big' cam was the 'in' thing to do. I'm sure it will make nice peak HP but I'm concerned about driveability, power under the curve, etc. It is not a daily-driver, but I would like it to be able to be if needed. Also, my wife drives it once in awhile and I want her to still feel comfortable driving it. I guess the car is so amazing right now (stock) in its ability to be (fairly) fast but still as docile as a Camry, that I don't want to f*ck it up by making it run like crap unless its at WOT. Obviously, I will be getting a tune no matter what.

I'm starting to think that something like a 228 or 230 cam (TR230....Futral F12....etc) might be more of what I really want.....nice torque curve as well as top-end, the ability to still use 6th gear under 80mph, etc. The car is mainly a street car, but I do go to the track (1/4 mi) a few times a summer.

Any thoughts on this scenario? Should I just put the 233/239 in and hope for the best? I know HP goals are sometimes a waste, but I'd like to see 420-ish rwhp (with longtubes, a Halltech or Blackwing, and a tune) and have good driving manners.

Has anybody gone with something similar to the 233/239 and NOT been happy with it, or wished they had gone smaller?

Thanks.
Old 01-03-2006, 10:41 PM
  #2  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The 233/239 should be more docile than a TR230.

Check out the TSP Torquer II, an Futral F13, or even an F11. 420ish RWHP is a little out of the league for all the cams you've mentioned.

All in all, a it's not just about the cam, it's about tuning and proper gears to match to contribute to overall drivability.

You should be fine with the cam you've already chosen.

I also see you haven't mentioned Long Tubes anywhere. If no LT's then check out Thunder Racing's CheaTR cam.
Old 01-03-2006, 10:42 PM
  #3  
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
iTrader: (18)
 
orangeapeel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Justin, TX
Posts: 16,083
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

you can give it to me!
Old 01-03-2006, 10:45 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
KrisR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
420ish RWHP is a little out of the league for all the cams you've mentioned.
Really? With an LS6 engine? I will be getting some longtubes and a Halltech intake as well. I thought my estimate was pretty tame. It dynoed 368/362 bone stock. I don't plan on changing out the 3.42s.
Old 01-03-2006, 10:47 PM
  #5  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Figure +15rwhp for LS6 heads, so yes, you're getting close (sorry, I'm programmed to think in 241 heads).
Old 01-03-2006, 10:49 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
KrisR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming, MN
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
Figure +15rwhp for LS6 heads, so yes, you're getting close (sorry, I'm programmed to think in 241 heads).
Understood. Thanks for the insight.
Old 01-03-2006, 10:59 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
calongo_SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria, TX
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have that cam on a 112 +2 in my automatic and it would be a little on the wild side for a daily driver, but for a weekend warrior it's just about perfect. In a M6 with a good tune it should be fine. I also think they have changed some things with the cam since I bought mine (XER lobes & 113 lsa), so it should be even tamer.
Old 01-03-2006, 11:12 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
THIRD-GEN92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Laredo, TX
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i believe your ls6 could see 420 rwhp on a smaller cam easy, i had the tr230 with longtubes, and made 413 tuned.
Old 01-03-2006, 11:19 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

TUNE will be what makes or breaks the friendlines of that cam.
It will act up on occasions, that is normal with all cams that size.
To make it short, it will not drive like stock, but its pleasures surely will outweigh its behaviour.
Headers, clutch and 4:10 gears would help a lot, and good tune.

As mentionned above, if you do not want to mod beyond these, then a Stealthier cam should be looked at. Stealth II, CheaTR, GT-11 to mention a few.
Old 01-03-2006, 11:23 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

If you have a good tuner, the driveability should be fine. 113LSA and XE-R lobes should make it a breeze to drive.
Old 01-04-2006, 12:38 AM
  #11  
Staging Lane
 
87Fake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: S.A. TX
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You should be fine with it. Like said, it's in the tune. I daily drove my MS3 for around 6 months, all the while working the tune.
Started off pretty rough, but now that the kinks are worked out, never skips a beat. A hiccup here and there with the ac on, still working on that. Gets decent milage to boot. And I'm still on 3.42s. Proper gearing will make it just about perfect. Don't worry.
Old 01-04-2006, 12:44 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
 
eamador11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sounds like you probably wanted my cam. 224/228@114. It drives like almost like stock but its an animal at WOT.

Heres my idle with this cam 224 cam-idle
Old 01-04-2006, 07:19 AM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1 BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: South Elgin
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I really like the numbers I've seen out of the F11. I would take power under the curve and driveability over peak numbers.
Old 01-04-2006, 07:47 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
z-ya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: minneapolis,mn
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1 BU
I really like the numbers I've seen out of the F11. I would take power under the curve and driveability over peak numbers.
Yup me too
Old 01-04-2006, 09:08 AM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
algws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: El Paso
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have an F13 on a 112+2 in my 04 Z06 and it has perfect driving maners. my 118 lbs fiance can drive it with no problem. fyi it made 420 rwhp and 396 rwtq and the heads have never been off the car.
Old 01-04-2006, 09:34 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
STRIPSTAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phila, Pennsyltucky
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would go 228 comp XER on 114. Maybe 230 - I have that and it will get your car close to 420 and drivability is ok, not great. IMO that cam with your wife driving is too big around town juts to gain some top end. My buddy has your car and its so nice and tame and fats stock, i think its a shame to kill the drivability for some peak HP.
Old 01-04-2006, 09:48 AM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Camaro99SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by orangeapeel
you can give it to me!
You already have a cam. Give it to me instead.

Jason
Old 01-04-2006, 10:26 AM
  #18  
Staging Lane
 
smithsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by THIRD-GEN92
i believe your ls6 could see 420 rwhp on a smaller cam easy, i had the tr230 with longtubes, and made 413 tuned.
I agree!

I'm making 451 with a Trex cam (see sig) and stock heads.

Steve
Old 01-04-2006, 11:44 AM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
BlackHawk T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
The 233/239 should be more docile than a TR230.
Curious, how is that possible? 233/239 vs a smaller 230/224?
Old 01-04-2006, 04:54 PM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BlackHawk T/A
Curious, how is that possible? 233/239 vs a smaller 230/224?
The Lobe seperations are diffrent. 233 has a 113 LSA, where the 230 has a 110 LSA. The wider LSA makes for a smoother idle, but a broader powerband.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.