Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Are you interested in one more mod-by-mod buildup of a 98-02 F-Body?
Yes, very interested
910
95.79%
Neutral
27
2.84%
Not interested
13
1.37%
Voters: 950. You may not vote on this poll

Would there be interest in a mod by mod buildup of an LS1 car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2006, 09:44 PM
  #1  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,695
Received 1,141 Likes on 741 Posts

Default Would there be interest in a mod by mod buildup of an LS1 car?

I'm in the market for another car to drive, and I've got a few 99-02 F-Body options...

Is there any interest in seeing mods dynoed, one mod at a time? Might also consider doing 2-3 cam swaps but I would only change the heads once.

I also might consider putting the cam choices up for a vote, to see what folks are interested. I will draw the line at no cams that require flycutting. Letting folks vote on the cam choices shows that I won't have a bias regarding the cam choice, I would leave that up to you guys.

Let me know.
Pro Stock John is offline  
Old 01-26-2006, 10:30 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im not sure. Id like to see it done, but my car has most mods already so it dosent really apeal to me as much (although a person with a stock car might bennifit more, but I dont think there are too many stock LS1 cars out there) For the heads, they should be something that the mojority of people can afford, and as for the cams I think it would be a good idea to maybe make it four. A bitch cam (stealth, old man, cheater) the proven cam (224) a medium cam (low 230's) and the big boys (X4, T-rex, etc) It would also help if the car was an M6 since that seems like the weapon of choice for a dyno.
DONAIMIAN is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 08:20 AM
  #3  
777
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It would be kind of hard to do accuratly. I mean a lot of mods are compliments. Especially a cam. You know what I mean, If you have full exhaust and stock intake, a 231/237 cam is not going to put down good numbers at all. I guess you could do it as a combo. As in if you buy these headers, this exhaust you will gain XXrwhp.
777 is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 11:49 AM
  #4  
Staging Lane
 
Aegnor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like the idea. For some of us, it's sort of a living vicariously thing. I love my car, but right now (and for the next 16 or so months) I'm too concerned with paying for the car to be able to pay for mods on it. I have a whole list of things I still want to do (at least $7000 worth of parts + installs + tuning) but since I still owe over $5000 on the car itself, I can't yet do those things. So my vote is yes, so I can get some idea of what will really happen with a step by step build up; power gains, track times, etc.
Aegnor is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 04:22 PM
  #5  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,695
Received 1,141 Likes on 741 Posts

Default

Thanks guys, keep the responses coming.
Pro Stock John is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 04:26 PM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
 
SPANKY LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What do you hope to accomplish? IMO it'll only lead to more "what headers are best" and "what lid is best" threads. By this point, we all pretty much know how to build the first 400rwhp, its the next 400rwhp that everyone is interested in. Kinda too basic for a technical forum IMO.

If anything, maybe do a lid test, once and for all. Test all available lids on a car, see which is best. Same with headers. Same with catbacks. Same with heads. Otherwise it will just be another H/C car in the dyno results forum. *yawn*

Personally, I'd rather see a part by part buildup of your turbo car, including dynos, track visits, what works, what doesn't, what fits, what doesn't, etc.

Last edited by SPANKY LS1; 01-27-2006 at 04:32 PM.
SPANKY LS1 is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 05:10 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (35)
 
bowtieman81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maryland/Illinois
Posts: 1,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

John, are you still planning a turbo build for your car? I am guessing this doesn't apply to many here on the site, but I think it might be interesting to follow a turbo build.

You could experiment with some different cams w/ a turbo, or maybe some differrent turbos to see boost threshold differences and efficiency/power tradeoffs. Just my bias opinion since I am looking to put a turbo on later this year.

As far as just doing some bolt-ons or cam swaps I don't know that we will learn too much. I believe that most of that info can be found in the dyno section. I also thing that most of the popular cams that are close in specs will make pretty much the same power.
bowtieman81 is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 10:04 PM
  #8  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,695
Received 1,141 Likes on 741 Posts

Default

The 98 Formula is going to be turbocharged in a month or so. I was referring to a 2nd car.
Pro Stock John is offline  
Old 01-29-2006, 12:11 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Ace$nyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fort Washington Pa
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If a full build why not make some real world tests on hot topics like SFCs and what size sways brake upgrades etc.

I would never want to miss any good info so I would say go for it.

It's fun to watch a build up!
Ace$nyper is offline  
Old 01-29-2006, 06:54 PM
  #10  
Teching In
 
Brainful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

great idea , but it requires great effort ! are u sure man it needs to be accurate , ive worked in a dyno for 6 months and i really know how to manipulate .. am sure it is going to be clean ,
why u doing that ?

thank u in advance
Brainful is offline  
Old 01-30-2006, 06:19 AM
  #11  
Launching!
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 269
Received 57 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

I'd be interested!
JakeRobb is offline  
Old 01-30-2006, 07:43 AM
  #12  
777
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SPANKY LS1
What do you hope to accomplish? IMO it'll only lead to more "what headers are best" and "what lid is best" threads. By this point, we all pretty much know how to build the first 400rwhp, its the next 400rwhp that everyone is interested in. Kinda too basic for a technical forum IMO.

If anything, maybe do a lid test, once and for all. Test all available lids on a car, see which is best. Same with headers. Same with catbacks. Same with heads. Otherwise it will just be another H/C car in the dyno results forum. *yawn*

Personally, I'd rather see a part by part buildup of your turbo car, including dynos, track visits, what works, what doesn't, what fits, what doesn't, etc.
There is already a lid comparison against almost all of the lids out today, if not all of them

Here ya go http://www.motorsporttech.com/press/...ay2004_02.html

Last edited by 777; 01-30-2006 at 07:50 AM.
777 is offline  
Old 01-30-2006, 07:47 AM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
magius231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Winston Salem, NC
Posts: 751
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'd be interested, but when you do it be very complete about it (how many times did it get tuned, what was changed in the tune, what issues did you run across during the build, what did you do to fix them, etc). Seems to me a lot of the questions on this board relate to average buildup stuff that people just don't know . might even make it a complete story for each mod (we all know each mod could be a book...of course it would be rated R for language )
magius231 is offline  
Old 01-30-2006, 09:14 AM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
dame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: berkeley ca
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Although I voted yes...... I am past the bolton/h/c phase...... it's probably not an option, but a motor buildup (such as a 402/408/etc) I think might be much more appreciated, considering that its about that time that these motors are starting to get rebuilt, and a few cam swaps (large as well as small) and possibly the differences in header size(1 3/4/-1 7/8) as well intake setups might be more beneficial. I KNOW id appreciate it more... but im aware thats alot more money

Its just that the 402/408 is such a popular route (relatively inexpensive) people are going right now. As far as a step by step build up of a stock car: IMHO LS1 tech has MORE THAN enough information to cover that.
dame is offline  
Old 01-30-2006, 11:42 AM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
BLK85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I voted yes, because in the very near future I will be buying a LS1 and it would be nice to see whats mods would be worth doing. Go for it.
BLK85 is offline  
Old 01-30-2006, 11:01 PM
  #16  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
prince xizor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I think it would be great to have a step by step build up w/ write ups and your comments/impressions. I would would just see you try and keep the paramaters the closest as possible. Get a 1/4mile time, a 0-60, a 0-60-0, and a dyno number that would be great.
prince xizor is offline  
Old 01-31-2006, 12:11 AM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
RedLT4Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Helotes/San Antonio
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I say yes.


Do it for the nOObs!

Not everyone knows as much as some of us do.
RedLT4Mike is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 06:34 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
Phoenix 5.7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Prairie de Femme, LA
Posts: 3,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

go for it, and use the better, but not rediculusly expensive parts. i would like to see a step by step buildup with parts like 90/90, 1 7/8 lts, SD tuned, Dart heads, and a variety of cams, with the goal of paking the most power out of a reasonable street setup. one thing i would really like to see are results of things like CF driveshafts, rims(lighter), and flywheels with respect to dyno results. (reducing the rotating mass and parasitic loss items). also things like suspension upgrades tested individually on drag times, and being that PSJ is very experienced, he should be consistent.
Phoenix 5.7 is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 09:18 PM
  #19  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,695
Received 1,141 Likes on 741 Posts

Default

Interesting comments from you guys.

How about stick or auto?
Pro Stock John is offline  
Old 02-02-2006, 12:22 AM
  #20  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
kws87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think it sounds like a good idea. It would give a lot of people at least a guide as to what they could expect from a prospective mod. A good idea would be to do them in the order most people mod anyway. Like lid, filter, catback, tb etc....
kws87 is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 PM.