Is it bad raising cam duration without raising compression ratio?
I've got a cam only (236/236 .581.. 112) and I don't have plans to do the heads anytime soon because I want to add a blower in the future. I want the compression no higher than it is now.
Suppose I didn't port my heads, but just milled them to raise compression by .5 - What would that gain?
Any thoughts on the duration/compression issue? -Joshua
I'm going to use that with a high duration wider LSA (114 or 115) cam and run it till I need to uprade to large chamber (Escalade) heads, with more boost and forged pistons/rods. -Joshua Trending Topics
Someday when somebody asks I'll say " I remember hearing that somewhere."... The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I believe this cam is on a 108 centerline with no advance ground in. 236/236-.581, .581-112
Just curious.
I believe this cam is on a 108 centerline with no advance ground in. 236/236-.581, .581-112
Just curious.
@.050 thanksBut, to estimate based on XE lobe profile:
You'd need to run around a 61cc head to get a DCR around ~8.5:1 with a .045" gasket, no flycutting, and .007 piston out of the hole.
So are you saying no one should put, say, the TR TRAK cam (231/234 .640/.590 112 LSA) in an untouched motor? I ask this because I have been planning on putting this cam along with upgraded springs later on in my SS with nothing done to the motor at all.
With a fully built engine, it's stupid to keep compression down near stock, because the camshafts are much larger and the discplacement is a lot bigger thereby pushing the DCR way down below an acceptable level.
one reason people might keep compression down in a ground up build is to maintain the use of pump gas. not everyone wants to run cam 2 race fuel..






