Seem to have found a difference in lid performance
Though the lid designs seemed identical, there was an immediate difference with the MTI unit, so much so that I had to dial my MAFT unit up a notch to stop detonation from the increased airflow (making mixture too lean). The driving response was clearly better also. Though I have not had the opportunity to dyno them, has anyone else seen this difference? Or is this merely random?
Chris
I went with SLP mainly because of the tube that sticks out of the side to put onto the air hose...
Ultimately, I think the dyno is the only way to tell the story. To really answer this, we need to find a few cars, and swap out one lid after another and run them on the dyno. I would bet there are people out there who have done this before.
I will do it just to find out in a couple of weeks. Of course, that will be post 422 <img src="images/icons/grin.gif" border="0">
<strong>If you have a stock MAF, and no MAFT you can see the airflow differences with ATAP.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Great idea - I didn't think of that. Now does anyone have a stock MAF? I gave mine away after going with the GMAF.
Trending Topics
Its basically an average 10 rwhp mod on a nearly stock car, and thats about it. Airbox lids are one of the best bang for the buck mods you can do nowadays.
MTI should have gotten a patent on them when they created them, they missed out on that HUGE golden goose for sure! I've never seen any other product for LS1s get copied so often.
Tony
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
<strong>Any gaps that are between the lid and the filter are going to hurt performance. Is it possible that you just got a better seal this time and thats the reason for the increase in performance? Just an idea.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I'm beginning to think that might be the case. I also see that Tony found no difference in his testing on the lids. All the same, I would like to have a day or two with a few cars, lids, and a bunch of dyno time.


