FIPK Dyno results
Josh S.
the lid and filter.All things being equal,
you saw the gains.
FRA or FTRA won't work.the opening would be
BEHIND the new filter,the filter won't pick it up.
It would blow fresh air into the engine compartment,though.
I'm done defending this system.
I'm 100% satisfied with it and I'm not usually
totally satisfied with anything. <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
Everybody has different opinions,stick to what
makes you happy.
the popular opinion(for people who don't have one)
is that it would suck warmer air.
Example-(pay no attention to the CFM's,it's just
an example.)
would you rather have 750 cfm of warmer air
or 500cfm of cooler air?
Ahhh,who cares,keep your lid and filter.
<img src="gr_tounge.gif" border="0"> <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
LMAO!!
Let's see what this does at the track before we judge. How can a dyno test of the two setups be fair? The viability of dyno testing depends on the conditions and changes made.
Terry's remark was meant to show that the comparison does NOT in and of itself prove the car is faster in REAL WORLD CONDITIONS than the lid with FTRA. I personally don't see how it could be....
Jason
<strong>You give me the million,and I'll figure
SOMETHIN' out. <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
Deal?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Here is an idea for free! <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
Build a lid around the FIPK, and duct it to the front fasade for nice cold air.
I'm smart!!! Actually I've seen it on the Vetts already! <img src="gr_stretch.gif" border="0">
Leo
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I also like the $275 for the Volant vs. the $300+ for the FIPK. <img src="graemlins/gr_judge.gif" border="0" alt="[judgement]" />
<img src="graemlins/formula.gif" border="0" alt="[Pontiac]" />
<strong>So someone tell me why this K&N FIPK is nicer than the Volant that everyone picked apart last year. <img src="images/icons/confused.gif" border="0"> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Probably because Tbyrne dynod one and the results indicated 1 or 2 less rwhp than a lid. So the same people that you see now jumping up and down saying that the dyno results on the FIPK mean nothing - spent last summer jumping and down saying that the Volant was crap because the it didn't show anything on the dyno <img src="images/icons/rolleyes.gif" border="0">
Also someone did a track test with it and a FTRA. And if I remember correctly the Volant was less than tenth - .03 sticks in my mind - slower than the FTRA. As soon as it was posted - everyone was all over saying see, it sucks. And that was enough for most folks to bury it.
Where as with the FIPK, the initial dyno results were just to overwhelming to keep people from trying it. Even then it's only in the last 6 weeks or so it seems to have reached a threshold of acceptance, with several dynos all showing positive gains over both stock and other AM systems.
[ March 01, 2002: Message edited by: MysticZ28 ]</p>
Mike
Once I launch its a straight cold shot right into my totally open nostrils.
Sorry I'm staying w/the BG/Lid combo.
JS








