FIPK Dyno results
02-23-2002, 04:46 PM
#1
FIPK Dyno results At Speed Inc.on a brand new dynojet.
2 runs w/
Slp lid w/ Holley filter,both brand new.NO FRA
BEST RUN 356.7 RWHP 373.7 Tq
3 runs with FIPK-BEST RUN
364.5 RWHP/ 379.4 Tq
FIPK GAIN over lid and filter
7.6 RWHP/ 5.7 rwtq with better Hp and tq over 4200rpm's.pretty much even until then.
FIPK 3 run AVERAGE -361.4 hp/377.3 tq
lid and Filter 2 run AVERAGE-354.7hp/371.3tq
6.7 RWHP AVERAGE (gain)
6.0 TQ AVERAGE (gain)
I'm pretty impressed.
Here's a shocker for ya,
Borla completely closed - 363.3hp/379.4tq.
Borla Wide open-359.6 hp/375.7tq
3.7 hp/3.7tq LOSS.
I think I'll keep it quiet.
<img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
HPP3 power tuning showed a very small gain
maybe 2hp/2tq gain,but like the fuel curve better.
(gets progressivly richer)
But Most important 01 STOCK MOTOR all the bolt
ons,Moser 12 bolt w/ 4.10 gears.
364.5 RWHP
379.4 RWTQ
Who needs heads and cam? <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
I don't really care what the numbers say,
give me the track. <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0"> If I trap @ 116 I'll crap my pants!
2 runs w/
Slp lid w/ Holley filter,both brand new.NO FRA
BEST RUN 356.7 RWHP 373.7 Tq
3 runs with FIPK-BEST RUN
364.5 RWHP/ 379.4 Tq
FIPK GAIN over lid and filter
7.6 RWHP/ 5.7 rwtq with better Hp and tq over 4200rpm's.pretty much even until then.
FIPK 3 run AVERAGE -361.4 hp/377.3 tq
lid and Filter 2 run AVERAGE-354.7hp/371.3tq
6.7 RWHP AVERAGE (gain)
6.0 TQ AVERAGE (gain)
I'm pretty impressed.
Here's a shocker for ya,
Borla completely closed - 363.3hp/379.4tq.
Borla Wide open-359.6 hp/375.7tq
3.7 hp/3.7tq LOSS.
I think I'll keep it quiet.
<img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
HPP3 power tuning showed a very small gain
maybe 2hp/2tq gain,but like the fuel curve better.
(gets progressivly richer)
But Most important 01 STOCK MOTOR all the bolt
ons,Moser 12 bolt w/ 4.10 gears.
364.5 RWHP
379.4 RWTQ
Who needs heads and cam? <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
I don't really care what the numbers say,
give me the track. <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0"> If I trap @ 116 I'll crap my pants!
02-23-2002, 05:12 PM
#5
Re: FIPK Dyno results FUEL INJECTION PERFORMANCE KIT.
Made by K&N.
Terry- I know,I had FRA but I gave it to someone
else since I didn't need it anymore.I didn't
plan on testing them back to back.Now someone
else has to test it. <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
I can't wait to see what it does on weatherguy's
422.
Made by K&N.
Terry- I know,I had FRA but I gave it to someone
else since I didn't need it anymore.I didn't
plan on testing them back to back.Now someone
else has to test it. <img src="gr_grin.gif" border="0">
I can't wait to see what it does on weatherguy's
422.
02-23-2002, 05:38 PM
#7
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Melbourne, FL
Posts: 3,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: FIPK Dyno results I keep seeing positive results from the K&N FIPK, so I guess I'll be trying one in place of my FTRA and Direct-Flow lid/Holley filter when I get my car back together...
Now, why the hell did it take K&N so long to come out with this? <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0">
Now, why the hell did it take K&N so long to come out with this? <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0">
Trending Topics
02-23-2002, 05:45 PM
#8
Re: FIPK Dyno results Originally I saw this months ago.
I figured it was a good idea, but no one was
running them.So I figured it was a waste of money.
I guess I was wrong.
I'm very happy w/ the results. <img src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" />
I figured it was a good idea, but no one was
running them.So I figured it was a waste of money.
I guess I was wrong.
I'm very happy w/ the results. <img src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" />
02-23-2002, 06:43 PM
#9
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Freeland, MD
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: FIPK Dyno results Thanks for posting the results. The good detail was also very appreciated.
The results are VERY interesting, to say the least. The question everyone is going to want to know now is what this translates to at the track. In the meanwhile, I think we are going to get a few more dyno runs from other people before that happens.
The results are VERY interesting, to say the least. The question everyone is going to want to know now is what this translates to at the track. In the meanwhile, I think we are going to get a few more dyno runs from other people before that happens.
02-23-2002, 08:23 PM
#11
Staging Lane
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: FIPK Dyno results Someone should do a test of FIPK and DirectFlo + FTRA at the track. Since FTRA does not show up on the dyno, it's really not fair to say the car performs better with the FIPK. If the MPH at the track of the FIPK is higher than the DirectFlo + FTRA, then you can truly say it makes more power. Not trying to flame the dyno numbers, just trying to be realistic.
02-23-2002, 09:08 PM
#12
Re: FIPK Dyno results Your post is legitimate.
But how big is the opening on the FTRA?That's how
I think of it.It can only flow so much, even if
there is a 'Ram air' effect.I could be wrong,
until people start track-testing it,we don't know.
I've learned this though: If I dyno higher,I trap
higher.I try and keep it simple. <img src="gr_stretch.gif" border="0">
But how big is the opening on the FTRA?That's how
I think of it.It can only flow so much, even if
there is a 'Ram air' effect.I could be wrong,
until people start track-testing it,we don't know.
I've learned this though: If I dyno higher,I trap
higher.I try and keep it simple. <img src="gr_stretch.gif" border="0">
02-23-2002, 10:26 PM
#13
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: FIPK Dyno results I'll take the "guaranteed" 6-7 HP over the entire 1/4 mile with the FIPK over the "maybe" few HP offered by a FRA configuration at the last 1/3 (if that) of the track.
02-24-2002, 12:22 AM
#15
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: FIPK Dyno results [quote]Originally posted by GeorgeC:
<strong>Now, why the hell did it take K&N so long to come out with this? <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0"> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Because nobody wanted to hear it. I installed it back in August. It was my my first mod and I got 22 rwhp gain over stock on a dyno. Posted the results up on LS1.com, CZ28 and SLP ...
New technology, pretty much ran into a "it can't possibley be better than a lid/FRTRA" bias.
<strong>Now, why the hell did it take K&N so long to come out with this? <img src="gr_eek2.gif" border="0"> </strong><hr></blockquote>
Because nobody wanted to hear it. I installed it back in August. It was my my first mod and I got 22 rwhp gain over stock on a dyno. Posted the results up on LS1.com, CZ28 and SLP ...
New technology, pretty much ran into a "it can't possibley be better than a lid/FRTRA" bias.
02-24-2002, 07:55 AM
#18
TECH Resident
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East, TN
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: FIPK Dyno results [quote]Originally posted by Damian:
<strong>Thats it, i'm buyin one.......</strong><hr></blockquote>
I quess that makes two of us, now I just need to cough up the money <img src="images/icons/confused.gif" border="0"> .
<strong>Thats it, i'm buyin one.......</strong><hr></blockquote>
I quess that makes two of us, now I just need to cough up the money <img src="images/icons/confused.gif" border="0"> .
