Reverse torquer cam (the other side of the coin)
But I've read this entire thread through twice now. Makes it almost impossible to make a decision! I was leaning pretty hard on the el torro based cam. But going all the way back to the specs in pred-z's original post, it almost seems like it would be more agressive, especially with the 108 LSA. I may never pick a cam... hahaha
All of us look for the "perfect" cam, but in reality, I've yet to see one live, it is so been a tug of war and whenever you spec one to achieve, high rpm output, you leave some of the midrange on the table.
The 230/230 is the closest I've been able to achieve that is more of an "All Around".
Mind you, it is not the most Hp producing, but the torque curve it carries, is very "broad" and contrary to most RS cams on the market, it carries well into the rpms without running out and nose diving after "peak". (Peak not being max rpm reached, but being the point at which it produced max Hp for its valve events and supporting mods)
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Last edited by nastychevelle; Jun 29, 2011 at 05:19 PM.
For converter I would suggest SS4000 Yank.(to achieve your ET goals)
Last edited by PREDATOR-Z; Jun 30, 2011 at 01:30 AM.
Take this cam
230/228 110-1 LSA
4>IVO
46>IVC
43>EVO
5>EVC
109>ECL
9* overlap
Look at the graph and you can see that the relation of IVC/EVO is very important in making trq and how you position intake bias is what is allowing that cam to carry far into the rpms without falling on its face (with regards to reverse that is)
To understand a reverse you have to discard traditional thinking, because as long as you cling to that, they won't make sense.
However as you can see, they actualy act contrary to beliefs with the right valve events.
That engine is also ~ 11.2:1 SCR, 346 ci, CNC ported 243 heads 59cc, stock valves.
400lbs of trq at 3500 rpm

This is not a fluke, I have duplicated that in various cid.The discussion from the biginning is not about max effort Hp production, but about substantial increase in early rpm trq which cooked in the right combo will have lethal results at the track.
So why run 7500 rpm if you can do better work by 7000? (in race environment)
It is all about where you want to make that power in the band and how will you use it.
Bottom line, the combos between traditional and reverse splits are not the same and each cater to their parameters in a certain way. That is why one cannot look at them from the same angle.
So, 224/220, 110-1 it is. Thanks for the first page of this thread, and not much else. Peace out.

A reverse split is not for you. So 224/220 is a BAAD choice.






