RAGEman

iTrader: (4)

In my efforts to make this thread go a full 7 pages, I'd like to say...

THERE'S my good buddy Mr. Campbell!!! What's happening, man? I'm sure you'll remember me as the guy who took all the wrong things (the light things) out of his car for weight reduction! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> A heads/cam package could cut my pursuit of the combined bolt-on record short, my friend, but then I'll just come after your unbelieveable 10.66!!

nysbadmk8, I don't believe you've revealed your real-life first name. Can I get you to do that for me so I won't have to keep typing that gay username of yours?!?! Anyway, dude, I have a pretty complete collection of bolt-on mods on my car (full exhaust, all the intake tricks and mods, shifter, etc.). The only thing I really lack are suspension mods. I'm still on completely stock suspension except for some polyurethane bushings in my lower control arms, the tranny mount, and the torque arm mount. My raceweight was around 3200 lbs. Disgusting, isn't it? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />

nysbadmk8

its peter

3200lbs crazy **** you are <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" />

Nine Ball

iTrader: (38)

Terry, please do your best to avoid any Cartek-related threads on our site. Its obvious that you are addicted to starting bullshit, even with your semi-transparent intentions. Do us all a favor and AVOID any Cartek related threads, your comments are obviously not welcome in them since everyone knows your history and bias on the issue.

I have better things to do than to delete your replies and the corresponding flame replies from other members.

JS, I thought you said you were not going to reply to Terry anymore. I see you are not good at keeping your word either. AVOID these baited replies, geez how f-ing hard is it to do?

<img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" /> Tony <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" />

ShiznityZ28

iTrader: (11)

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Nine Ball:
<strong>Terry, please do your best to avoid any Cartek-related threads on our site. Its obvious that you are addicted to starting bullshit, even with your semi-transparent intentions. Do us all a favor and AVOID any Cartek related threads, your comments are obviously not welcome in them since everyone knows your history and bias on the issue.

I have better things to do than to delete your replies and the corresponding flame replies from other members.

JS, I thought you said you were not going to reply to Terry anymore. I see you are not good at keeping your word either. AVOID these baited replies, geez how f-ing hard is it to do?

<img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" /> Tony <img border="0" title="" alt="[Mad]" src="gr_images/icons/mad.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">finally someone gets it under control.

Max@Cartek

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Terry, please do your best to avoid any Cartek-related threads on our site. Its obvious that you are addicted to starting bullshit, even with your semi-transparent intentions. Do us all a favor and AVOID any Cartek related threads, your comments are obviously not welcome in them since everyone knows your history and bias on the issue.

I have better things to do than to delete your replies and the corresponding flame replies from other members.

JS, I thought you said you were not going to reply to Terry anymore. I see you are not good at keeping your word either. AVOID these baited replies, geez how f-ing hard is it to do?

Tony </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Amen brother!

I hope this'll make it 7 pages.

Max

JPR

The last time I was at the dyno tunning the same packages with the only difference being Locked down high stall Auto vs M6, I have found that there is a 3-4% horsepower difference still in the M6's favor, 3:73's vs 3:73's at 1 to 1 ratios. So I kinda thumbs down the locked down high stall vs better than the M6 theory, unless there is something I am calculating wrong?

Just my 2c's worth.

JS

iTrader: (4)

Tony,I said I wouldnt answer Terry unless he was trying to make a point.He said,"auto's dyno better than 6sp."

I dissagreed as did most people on here.Plain and simple.

But I respect u and I'll stay away from posting in his nonsense from here on out.

JS

Waxman355

I too just picked my 2002 camaro ss up from Cartek and it put down 427 at the rear wheels. I am extremely happy with how it performed and the service from Cartek!

AlonzoVersion 1.0

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by nysbadmk8:
<strong>terry THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL THE A4 DYNOS THE SAME AS A M6... period... you dont want to get proof... cause there is no proof... funny thing is... with my full weight street car... all i gotta do is jet in a 100 shot and i can beat your track times... with the A/C blowing cold all the way down the track...</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">That maybe but he can hook his kit up just like you can.Not everyone likes to use juice.To me it is a greater accomplishment to hit that magical number that you want on motor than it is on juice.After you have squeezed every last bit out of the motor then strap the bottle on it.I am sure a lot of poeple with quick N/A cars would lose to some of our cars with a bottle strapped on.

Fireball

iTrader: (21)

this thread is way long....starting new one <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />