TORCHD 02 TA

iTrader: (39)

As some of you requested, here is my cam graphs

In the first post i added the graphs.. and i will put them here too

Lost my original pull that gave me my numbers...

FIRST PULL WITH CAM

I FORGOT WHAT THIS GRAPH SHOW

NICE A:F

CORRECTED NUMBERS

brad8266

iTrader: (23)

Nice flat TQ curve. 350lbs-ft @ 3500 on a stang dyno is great. Looks good man.

TORCHD 02 TA

iTrader: (39)

thanks Brad... i was really impressed with the A:F

but damn this bucking at 1400 - 1700 RPMs, the slight hesitation between 1500 - 2500 RPMs when driving slow you can lightly feel the car jerking some times it pops like a backfire.. and the warm start.. But man i must say the tuner is great. we talked on the phone last night for 2 hours aobut the problems. He is very willing to work with me and keep helping me out...

I think i amy need a 4.10 gear to lower the TQ curve down so that the damn bucking will go away

brad8266

iTrader: (23)

yeah a steeper gear will help, and your gonna have to have that tuned real good to stop that bucking/hesitation.

TORCHD 02 TA

iTrader: (39)

yea we are working on it. that is why it is going back monday. the 4.10 should prolly cure the problem :crosses fingers: car is not fun to drive right now..

espically since when i am crusing at 40 - 50 that is around where the car bucks in 5th car.

N4cer

iTrader: (11)

Those dyno sheets aren't right bro. The torque and HP curves should always intersect at 5252rpm. Am I just reading it wrong?

TORCHD 02 TA

iTrader: (39)

no idea.. to be honest i am not a pro graph reader

N4cer

iTrader: (11)

LOL that sounds like an odd job. Kinda like this job:
http://ca.video.yahoo.com/video/play...16135&fr=yvmtf

But seriously, you should probably look into that to make sure the graph is valid. You get what I'm saying about the graph, right?

brad8266

iTrader: (23)

Funny video

yeah they dont seem to intersect right. Whats up with that?? I didnt look at that at first, all i looked at was the tq curve.

-Joseph-

iTrader: (12)

Graph looks right, the HP and TQ scaling are not graphed using the same scale. Tq on left start at 100lb ft, while HP on the right starts at 0.

brad8266

iTrader: (23)

good find, lol.

N4cer

iTrader: (11)

Yeah I just noticed that, Joseph. Not to take anything from the original poster, because those are good numbers no matter how you look at it. But why would the scaling be set up that way? To make the torque look higher to uninformed customers? It throws the simplicity off for absolutely no good reason that I can think of.

brad8266

iTrader: (23)

I dunno why its done like that but I have been on a few dynos that do it like that.

BOWTIE

Well it looks like your HP peaked sooner than you were thinking in your original post. Looks like it peaked right about 6300-6400 which is just about perfect. I was a little worried when you said it peaked at 6600 because I ordered a similar cam but with only 2 deg advance. Hopefully mine will not peak much higher than yours (6400-6500).

NBM2001z28

iTrader: (43)

Actually I never noticed our dyno had the scales set up like that. Ill change the defaults on monday. I guess its something I never noticed on there...

TORCHD 02 TA

iTrader: (39)

Thanks for clearign that up... i ahd not idea honestly...

TORCHD 02 TA

iTrader: (39)

It is what it is...

TORCHD 02 TA

iTrader: (39)

yea i looked at it wrong... it peaks at 6400 and i set the rev limiter to 6600...

The +4 is a more down low cam.. torquer..

The +2 is more of a top end cam...

N4cer

iTrader: (11)

slow trap

iTrader: (22)

those are some sweet numbers,congrats.i would of thought it would have peaked around 6100-6200 or so though as my 228r 112 +2 peaked there but anyways yours carries power out great.anyways great numbers.