Which cam for TEA stage 2 heads?
wesley
98 Z28
Call up ThunderRacing, get their Heads/Cam package, the TR224 is an awesome cam, you got another vehicle to drive so if you want get a LARGE CAM!!
Actually pick a number and find the guys with that number. Thunder is doing well, so is Cartek, MMS, MTI, and several others.
Just do something!!
For the price and performace, I'd stick with TEA. No just talk, I've been looking at heads and cam packages for almost 4 years. I think TEA's Stage 2's are the best for the money. I ordered TEA's heads so I put my $$$ where my mouth is. I like GTP too, almost ordered a set from Craig last year. GTP is too expensive for to me for MAYBE a few extra hp. I can do the whole TEA package for what just GTP dual spring heads cost AND pay core charge upgrading too 5.3's. However, a TR cam with TEA heads might work really well, call TEA and ask Brent.
If money isn't an issue get both, dyno both and keep the best heads. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Sporatic's car made 420rwhp with an LS1 intake, mac's, B1 cam, TEA Stage 2 heads over a year ago...pretty impressive.
Verb's car made 437rwhp with 230/224 cam, TEA Stage 2 heads, LS6 intake and few other items w/12-bolt or 9-inch read end--I forgot which.
Talk with Brian Tooley at TEA about cam selection. Brent can help as well.
TEA is pretty decent at cam selection they have a nice 222/222 that should work well w/o much tuning. B1 will work well too.
I have a thread similar to this about cam's for TEA heads too.
So far I'm leaning toward:
226/226 w/XE-r ramps on a 114LSA for emissions/OBD-II w/590ish lift and 4 degrees of advance ground in.
Also considering TR-220, TR-224, B1, and a custom TEA grind.
<small>[ September 19, 2002, 04:17 PM: Message edited by: 99 Black Bird T/A ]</small>
<strong>WESLEY!!!!!!!!!!
Call up ThunderRacing, get their Heads/Cam package</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Doesnt thunderracing just resell GTP heads? Or do they do something different?
<strong>
Verb's car made 437rwhp with 230/224 cam, TEA Stage 2 heads, LS6 intake and few other items w/12-bolt or 9-inch read end--I forgot which.
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">33 spline 12 bolt w/ 3.73's <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> And I've got lots of tuning to go....
Trending Topics
What are your goals as far as driveablity, emmissions concerns, etc. My car breezed through emissions testing.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
thanks for all the replies...sounds like TEA will be the ones to go with..for the money...guess i'll call them soon...later fellas
wesley
98 Z28
Email this fella right here: brentb3243@comcast.net
he really knows his cam stuff and his car is very quick NA (low low 7's in 1/8th). A4 car.
<small>[ September 22, 2002, 08:17 AM: Message edited by: Dustin Butts ]</small>
Thanks for the comments guys.I think Brian is up on his game very well ,the CNC machine is working great,not to mention if you order a set of heads now cause your buddy just made x power with them,you know you will get the same quality as his within a few CFM,Becuase the CNC is very repeatable.
As far as cam if you have killer exhaust on the car. (long-tubes,cut out etc) I would look towards one of thunders cam's. I am leaning toward there 227/224 myself and TEA will also do similar grinds for you.(which is the route I am going. I like the 230 cam but you have to watch your milling,so thats why I would use the 227/224
BTW I used to work for TEA,but do not any longer.
There is another Brent that works there now.
Oh I am running 7.30's with a cam that is only 216 on a 114 so you can run that number,no problem with a small cam. with the right converter
I would use a st3500 or somthing similar.
For the best drivability I would use something like a 220/220 with around .550 lift on a 114,the 218/218 also works great and has a great idle and makes very nice power.
Or what I would like to see tried would be a 224intake 218 exhaust on a 114.I think it would idle great with real good power.Providing you have headers and a free flowing exhaust.
<small>[ September 22, 2002, 03:17 PM: Message edited by: H82BBad ]</small>
The car ran good the the track. To the tune of 1.56 60' 7.20 at 96.8. The 1/4 times i never got to make one good complete pass but the best one was a 11.45 at 119.8 Cause the yank tranny wouldnt hold up. Brent and Andy can vouch for this cam as they have both had it. Justin
What up Andy and Justin...where you guys been? As soon as my suspension stuff arrives and gets installed I am heading to BG(God willing). This car is running awesome with the new ARE PnP high flow fuel pump and 3.73's. I feel like Warren Johnson up in here...Maybe I can FINALLY slip into the 10 sec zone.
<strong>Brent's my hero...heeheheheeee..
What up Andy and Justin...where you guys been? As soon as my suspension stuff arrives and gets installed I am heading to BG(God willing). This car is running awesome with the new ARE PnP high flow fuel pump and 3.73's. I feel like Warren Johnson up in here...Maybe I can FINALLY slip into the 10 sec zone.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">All I do is work anymore. And since I decided not to race or mod the Vette, I don't make it to Beech Bend as much. Maybe I'll have a project car in the near future to play with. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Go FasTA:
<strong>Keep in mind that Brent actually came up with the specs for the 222/222 .566/.566 112 cam for me originally. This spec was later repeated by others and is now known by many as the "Hammer Cam". Brent definitely has very good insight on cam design and specification. I would (and did) take his advice. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Talked with Brent today about cam selection for my TEA Stage 2's. Looking at tweaking your Go FastTa cam for my application. Current plan is to do a 222/222 on a 114 LSA w/566 lift with XE-R lobes.
Thinking is it will have a better chance at passing emissions stuff on the 114 and idle a little better untuned. Think it should drive ok in a M6 w/3.73 or higher gears until I can get the car tuned.
Not to hog in on Wesley thread but what do ya'll think?
<strong>My goals are similar to Wesley's, as mentioned in the other TEA head/cam selection thread.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Go FasTA:
<strong>Keep in mind that Brent actually came up with the specs for the 222/222 .566/.566 112 cam for me originally. This spec was later repeated by others and is now known by many as the "Hammer Cam". Brent definitely has very good insight on cam design and specification. I would (and did) take his advice. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Talked with Brent today about cam selection for my TEA Stage 2's. Looking at tweaking your Go FastTa cam for my application. Current plan is to do a 222/222 on a 114 LSA w/566 lift with XE-R lobes.
Thinking is it will have a better chance at passing emissions stuff on the 114 and idle a little better untuned. Think it should drive ok in a M6 w/3.73 or higher gears until I can get the car tuned.
Not to hog in on Wesley thread but what do ya'll think?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Well you talked to the other Brent <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
I dont work there anymore.And I might add I would talk to Brian over the current Brent that works there.JMO
Thanks for the kind words guys,makes my little heart go pitter patter <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
if you want a great idle and great all around driving,try a reverse split.Brian and I had talked of using a reverse split last year but I didnt want to be the guinnie pig <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> Glad thunder had the nuts to do it as they are performing very well for them.And we all win by them taking a chance.
224intake /218 or 220 exhaust, on a 114.
stay around .540-.560 lift anymore than that and I would use bronze valve guides over the stock valve guides.
Brent B
<small>[ September 24, 2002, 07:51 PM: Message edited by: H82BBad ]</small>
Well you talked to the other Brent <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
I dont work there anymore.And I might add I would talk to Brian over the current Brent that works there.JMO
Thanks for the kind words guys,makes my little heart go pitter patter <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Brent B[/QB]</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">TEA pretty much directs all the LS1 stuff to the other Brent these days. Brian is always busy.
Matt's (Sporadic) car is a great example of what can be accomplished with a mild setup and a 114 cam in an M6. 420 rwhp through an LS1 intake with a B1 cam is an excellent accomplishment. His car definitely idles much better than mine did with the 222 .566 112 cam. He also has less surging/bucking. If I were to put a cam in the Vette, it would definitely be on a 114 LSA.
Oh, also keep in mind that neither Matt or I had any custom tuning other than HPP3 power tuning.
<img border="0" alt="[Corvette]" title="" src="graemlins/corvette.gif" />





