Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

my 228/232 cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2007 | 09:38 PM
  #141  
CrawlinWS6's Avatar
Import Patrol
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Brookfield, IL
Default

My pcm is offered to you for your cause!
Old 03-22-2007 | 09:39 PM
  #142  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default

CrawlinWS6 just called me, siad that his PCM out of his 02 WS6 is sitting on the shelf and that i could use it.. Thanks Jay!!! I will let you know
Old 03-22-2007 | 09:47 PM
  #143  
SSpdDmon's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
From: Commerce Twp, MI
Default

I'm still at a loss as to why the IAC needs to read higher than 190??? It should be in the 120's on a cold startup and settle in around 60 once up to temp.
Old 03-22-2007 | 09:49 PM
  #144  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by TORCHD 02 TA
Yes mike siad that they were already copied. but unplugging the MAF what will that due to the car as far as idle and what not? To reset the SES jsut unplugg the - terminal right?

Yes there is spark added 19* up to 1600 RPMs...
All unplugging will do is revert to the low octane table (which you copied) and the car will turn the SES on and you will run in SD. I have been running like that ever since I swapped my engine and ditched the MAF, no problems.

19* WTF??? You need a lot more than that to fix surging. Thats your main problem right there likely. Try something like this, its my half *** blind tune i did to hold me over till i get HPT next week.

23.0 26.0 31.0 34.0 36.0 40.0 43.0
23.0 26.0 31.0 34.0 36.0 40.0 43.0
23.0 26.0 31.0 34.0 36.0 40.0 43.0
23.0 26.0 31.0 34.0 36.0 40.0 40.0
21.0 26.0 32.0 35.0 36.0 38.0 39.0
24.0 27.0 29.0 32.0 33.0 35.0 37.0
28.0 29.5 28.0 31.0 30.0 33.0 35.0
24.0 25.8 24.0 28.0 29.0 32.0 35.0
22.0 24.0 23.0 26.0 28.0 31.0 32.0
20.0 22.0 19.0 24.0 25.0 29.0 31.0
Old 03-22-2007 | 09:51 PM
  #145  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
All unplugging will do is revert to the low octane table (which you copied) and the car will turn the SES on and you will run in SD. I have been running like that ever since I swapped my engine and ditched the MAF, no problems.

19* WTF??? You need a lot more than that to fix surging.


any more timing added would make the car buck more..... i will try unplugging the MAF and see what happens
Old 03-22-2007 | 09:54 PM
  #146  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by TORCHD 02 TA
any more timing added would make the car buck more..... i will try unplugging the MAF and see what happens
No you have it *** backwards, too less timing will cause bucking, you add spark advance on the low end with a cam to stop bucking. Who is doing the tuning if you dont mind? Is it someone well known here? Sorry if your tuner reads this but if he is pulling timing on the low end with a cam like that then he has no idea how to tune. I hope he isnt adding fuel either because you should be pulling fuel down low.

Big cam = less fuel and more spark advance.

i posted some spark numbers above, if you want my whole table i can give it to you, like i said it is a half *** blind tune to keep it running good at low rpm's only. i didnt bother doing anything else.
Old 03-22-2007 | 10:11 PM
  #147  
Smokin87TA's Avatar
Restricted User
iTrader: (183)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Schaumburg, Il
Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
Big cam = less fuel and more spark advance.
That is exactly right and is extremely important in getting a large cam to idle.

Here is a thread that might help you get started on fixing your problem.

http://www.hptuners.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10978
Old 03-22-2007 | 10:13 PM
  #148  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Here are some of my tables to give you an idea of what yours should resemble somewhat, my car runs fine too, even though the tables could use some adjustments for optimum performance.

With timing like you mentioned Jonas that car with that cam will never idle or even drive right, i bet its bucking like crazy now that you told me how much timing you are running. It would be driving me nuts man. Turn that timing up a lot and pull the fuel and you will feel an instant change.

My tables need some real tuning by far, but it runs fine and is pleasurable to drive around town like this and it gives me great warm starts. I will tune it right next week after i get HPT, so for now this is what i got.

IAC Park:
33.00 28.00 23.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00 21.00

Idle running airflow in gear:
22.00 19.00 15.20 12.20 10.40 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60

VE table, i have 2000 PCM so i have a secondary table, map goes from 20 to 100 in increments of 10 and rpm is from 400-1600 in increments of 400 rpm's. Scale it accordingly to your VE table. I went really low here since the cam wanted to force the car to keep adding fuel, going this low got me a nice lean idle, just how i like it.

397 615 754 1108
468 698 870 1279
511 756 911 1334
537 790 952 1389
590 825 951 1371
610 853 985 1418
632 881 1018 1463
659 916 1076 1528
702 974 1128 1601

Spark table up to 1600 rpm and .4 Gms/cyl
23.0 26.0 31.0 34.0 36.0 40.0 43.0
23.0 26.0 31.0 34.0 36.0 40.0 43.0
23.0 26.0 31.0 34.0 36.0 40.0 43.0
23.0 26.0 31.0 34.0 36.0 40.0 40.0
21.0 26.0 32.0 35.0 36.0 38.0 39.0
24.0 27.0 29.0 32.0 33.0 35.0 37.0
28.0 29.5 28.0 31.0 30.0 33.0 35.0
24.0 25.8 24.0 28.0 29.0 32.0 35.0
22.0 24.0 23.0 26.0 28.0 31.0 32.0

base spark in park
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
21.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0

base spark in drive
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
21.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
22.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
25.0 25.0 26.0 26.0 32.0
24.0 24.0 26.0 26.0 32.0

Last edited by brad8266; 03-22-2007 at 10:21 PM.
Old 03-23-2007 | 01:50 PM
  #149  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default

thanks for all your help here brad. I am sure that tuner is reading this which is not a problem. I do not want to name any names. If he wants to respond he can... But i am sure he sees and prolyl has tried this, as for my timing goes, maybe i do have more, i could be mistaking i would have to ask him...

i will get back to you..
Old 03-23-2007 | 01:57 PM
  #150  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Good luck man, be sure to get that timing up a lot though that may be your problem. if you are at 19* in these cells you wont idle or drive right.
Old 03-25-2007 | 08:22 PM
  #151  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by brad8266
No you have it *** backwards, too less timing will cause bucking, you add spark advance on the low end with a cam to stop bucking. Who is doing the tuning if you dont mind? Is it someone well known here? Sorry if your tuner reads this but if he is pulling timing on the low end with a cam like that then he has no idea how to tune. I hope he isnt adding fuel either because you should be pulling fuel down low.

Big cam = less fuel and more spark advance.

i posted some spark numbers above, if you want my whole table i can give it to you, like i said it is a half *** blind tune to keep it running good at low rpm's only. i didnt bother doing anything else.
Brad i had 29* of timing in the car, but the bucking was unbearable. Took it down to 19* and got rid a lot of bucking.....
Old 03-25-2007 | 08:23 PM
  #152  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default

Well i ahve my buddies (CrawlinWS6) 2002n PCM.. Either this week Tues. or Thurs. I am going to swap mine out put his in and put my tune in it. See if there is any difference.....
Old 03-25-2007 | 08:24 PM
  #153  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by TORCHD 02 TA
Brad i had 29* of timing in the car, but the bucking was unbearable. Took it down to 19* and got rid a lot of bucking.....
29 degrees where at in the table? 29 is too much for many parts of it. You are going from one extreme to the other, tuning needs to be done in steps to get it right, you cant just go making huge jumps like that. 29 sucked so you go to like 25 or 26 and see how it reacts, then go lower if need be.
Old 03-26-2007 | 11:15 PM
  #154  
BOWTIE's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
From: AUSTIN TX
Default

Originally Posted by NBM2001Z28
Everyone that comes thru here knows me and knows I will make Mike spend as much time as needed on something to drive and start as well as the modifications allow. Jays, Crawlin WS6, car did have a Trex, which idled at 880 RPM's in drive, barely had any idle surge, you could give it throttle and then stand on the brakes and it would catch itself and that is on a 110 LSA. Not a 110+4, for how good the 228/232 drives in Jonas's car, I'd be very happy with it if it were mine.
No one here has the same cam as him, or anything with a 110+4. 112 and 114 LSA cams are VERY different then these. Most of the guys that I have read in this thread that say they can tune it, sound like it would be their first time. The guy that says the 02's dont have anything to do with a cam swap and running right... < - - Ill leave it at that.
I have been following this thread since it began and following this cam swap since before this thread as well since, this is quite similar to what I have ordered (227/234 LSK/XER 110+2). And I must admit I am quite suprised by this outcome so far. Mike, from what you are saying here it sounded to me as though you had fewer problems tuning a TREX on a 110 with no advance than this one. I find it hard to believe the 4 deg advance is causing that much additional headache, but if it is have you guys considered retarding the camshaft. Get an adjustable timing set, retard it 4 deg and it will be straight uo 110 LSA with a 110 ICL. I was also wondering if you guys installed the cam and if you did was the ICL checked (degreed). Afterall, we have seen a Comp cam ordered with 2 deg advance come with a cam card stating 2 deg advance but was actually 4 deg adv. Could it be possible there was a mistake on this one. Or was it possible that perhaps the gear set was installed a tooth or mark off? I know it sounds crazy, but I built motors for 10 years and still managed to screw one up on one of my personal builds ( 3 way adjustable gear set and I aligned the dot on the cam gear with the mark marking the keyway instead of the one marking the alignment). That would cause some driveability issues for sure, especially if it was retarded, which would shift the power band way up and take away a ton of low end. Just food for thought if the computer does not fix the problem. Even if you all still decide to pull the cam, it would be nice to know for sure everything was ground and installed correctly.
Old 03-28-2007 | 08:40 PM
  #155  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default

i am going friday to swap PCMs to see if anything changes... I will keep you all updated
Old 03-29-2007 | 07:39 AM
  #156  
SSpdDmon's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
From: Commerce Twp, MI
Default

This thread inspired me to change my sig...
Old 03-29-2007 | 07:46 AM
  #157  
brad8266's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
From: Watertown, NY
Default

Originally Posted by SSpdDmon
This thread inspired me to change my sig...
Old 03-29-2007 | 12:45 PM
  #158  
TORCHD 02 TA's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7,883
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default

ohh man LOL
Old 04-08-2007 | 10:10 AM
  #159  
BlueSix's Avatar
TECH Junkie
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,050
Likes: 0
From: its fucking cold
Default

any updates?
Old 04-08-2007 | 11:04 AM
  #160  
vetred's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Issaquah, Wa.
Default

Originally Posted by davidtomasiewicz
Are you an auto or 6sp? I got the same cam coming this week only with a 112+2 Lsa!
Me (oddly enough,... too) That cam is a proven pavement pounder! don't be surprised if the problems resurface with a different cam! It always depends on the complete set-up you know supporting mods and all that ****! It costs so fuken much that it has taken me a couple of YEARS to get where I'm at which is doing the L.S.6 ported heads and the comp 228/232......112 and for my **** I think it will be perfect. I don't want a pure drag car, I need to drive some,.......eh,......road trips occasionally. You know,....we call it,....touring with ,....authority.................


Quick Reply: my 228/232 cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM.