500 rwhp streeet driven
- stock bottom end
-Exhaust
-y-pipe/longtubes
-cam
-supercharger kit
-heads? (with valves,springs,etc..)
As far as the engine is concerned do you think these parts could be used together to make 500 rwhp and daily drivable?
P.S. not sure which section of the forum this thread belongs in, sorry if this is the wrong place <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
<small>[ October 01, 2002, 11:41 AM: Message edited by: AndyL ]</small>
Twin Turbo kit
Heads/Cam
Iron Block
100 shot of N20 (for fun)
Sheetmetal intake
Other forged internals
WOOOHOOO!
That's more than 500RWHP, huh? Hehehe.
Nick

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
Mild heads, cam, forged pistons and rods, head studs, good rod bolts, fuel system, and 5-6# of boost would through you into the 550rwhp range and be pretty damn safe. If you had the fuel system behind it, you could easily bump into the 650s with a little more boost.
500 is basically the ragged edge of a stock shortblock holding together. It will live for a while, but not for long.
BTW--is is pretty well known that the stock shortblock won't live for long at that power level. How long has your car been running at that power level?
If you're going to call people idiots, you'd better do your research. There are a hell of a lot of folks who have tanked a stock shortblock running that power level. I'm not talking about people who don't know what they are doing either. That is just beyond its capabilities. You can run it for a while, but it definitely isn't a great idea.
<small>[ October 01, 2002, 03:59 PM: Message edited by: DenzSS ]</small>
<img border="0" alt="[Burnout]" title="" src="graemlins/burnout.gif" />
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
That with 8-10#s boost would make ~550-650RWHP and be dead reliable with good fuel system and 42# injectors/LS1 edit tuning on 93 octane.
Cheers,
Chris
ps- Raymers new single turbo kit is going to be awesome. I would look into that with the forged piston/6L headed combo <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
<strong>rwb--who built your car?
BTW--is is pretty well known that the stock shortblock won't live for long at that power level. How long has your car been running at that power level?
If you're going to call people idiots, you'd better do your research. There are a hell of a lot of folks who have tanked a stock shortblock running that power level. I'm not talking about people who don't know what they are doing either. That is just beyond its capabilities. You can run it for a while, but it definitely isn't a great idea.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">My stock shortblock now has 82,000 miles and I still spray the **** out of it. 500rwhp can definitely be considered reliable on the stock bottom. Still my daily driver. I wish the clutch and rearend was HALF as reliable as the engine.
I don't see a reliable 500 RWHP being any problem at all with N20. I mean, that's only about a 200 shot on a bone stock engine (that's been done) or a measly 100 shot on a heads/cam combo (you really can't tell me that a 100 shot is dangerous when any common sense at all is used.) Big deal. There must be hundreds of folks on this board alone doing it.
<small>[ October 01, 2002, 04:49 PM: Message edited by: Colonel ]</small>
<strong>Where the heck did the idea of a stock bottom end not being good for 500 RWHP? That's laughable! <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" />
I don't see a reliable 500 RWHP being any problem at all with N20. I mean, that's only about a 200 shot on a bone stock engine (that's been done) or a measly 100 shot on a heads/cam combo (you really can't tell me that a 100 shot is dangerous when any common sense at all is used.) Big deal. There must be hundreds of folks on this board alone doing it.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">With nitrous I'll definitely agree. A lot of guys run a pretty healthy shot with a good fuel system and it does wonderfully. However, the original post was about a blower. With a blower or a turbo it is a different story. Just go in the FI section and ask around, you'll get the same answer.
RWB--I know your car. I did part of the tuning on it. When you kept getting on it even though the fuel pressure was dropping hard, you could have cracked a piston or a ring as easy as you blew a head gasket.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> There are plenty of people running around with more than 500 horses on a daily driver. I stand on my earlier comments! </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Please name a few that are supercharged or turbocharged daily drivers over 500rwhp on the stock bottom end.
I'm not going to argue about the nitrous cars, that is pretty well proven. I am going to stand by my comments when you're talking about supercharging or turbocharging.
Is lingenfelter's 500HP turbo kit putting out 500 at the wheels or the crank? Big difference.
<small>[ October 01, 2002, 05:35 PM: Message edited by: DenzSS ]</small>
9psi is good drop in fuel pressure.
I'm not saying the engine won't last for a bit, but it is on borrowed time. My opinion of course.
A few other tuners are putting out cars above 500 rwhp on stock blocks with superchargers also...
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Colonel:
<strong>Where the heck did the idea of a stock bottom end not being good for 500 RWHP? That's laughable! <img border="0" alt="[jester]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_jest.gif" />
I don't see a reliable 500 RWHP being any problem at all with N20. I mean, that's only about a 200 shot on a bone stock engine (that's been done) or a measly 100 shot on a heads/cam combo (you really can't tell me that a 100 shot is dangerous when any common sense at all is used.) Big deal. There must be hundreds of folks on this board alone doing it.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">With nitrous I'll definitely agree. A lot of guys run a pretty healthy shot with a good fuel system and it does wonderfully. However, the original post was about a blower. With a blower or a turbo it is a different story. Just go in the FI section and ask around, you'll get the same answer.
RWB--I know your car. I did part of the tuning on it. When you kept getting on it even though the fuel pressure was dropping hard, you could have cracked a piston or a ring as easy as you blew a head gasket.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> There are plenty of people running around with more than 500 horses on a daily driver. I stand on my earlier comments! </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Please name a few that are supercharged or turbocharged daily drivers over 500rwhp on the stock bottom end.
I'm not going to argue about the nitrous cars, that is pretty well proven. I am going to stand by my comments when you're talking about supercharging or turbocharging.
Is lingenfelter's 500HP turbo kit putting out 500 at the wheels or the crank? Big difference.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm sorry but this post makes very little sense... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Confused]" src="images/icons/confused.gif" /> NO ENGINE will last when run too lean. What's your point? This has NOTHING to do with the bottom end being reliable. As for a boosted application it should actually be easier on the stock shortblock than using Nitrous if both are set up properly. Nitrous gives an instant hit of torque while a boosted application comes in slower.
Ok. I'll change my opinion when people start posting examples of 500+rwhp supercharged or turbocharged cars with a stock shortblock that have lasted any decent amount of time.
RWB--I understand that you don't care if you tank your shortblock. The discussion in this post, that you disputed, was if a supercharged 500rwhp stock shortblock setup would last. I say that it won't last for long.
For example: In the last couple of days, a GWP tuned (very conservatively I might add--good job guys) 8# D1SC car with a stock shortblock that was putting down 508rwhp cracked a piston here in KC. The car was running great, good A/F, no problems. Blam--cracked piston.



