Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

224R vs 228R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2007, 08:25 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Matt2105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jacksonville, AL
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 224R vs 228R

Both cams from Texas Speed. 224R specs in at 224/224 of course and .581/.581. lift.

228R is 228/228 and .588/.588.

Id get either on a 112 LSA. Originally I wanted go bigger than the 224 because I didnt want to have to go up again later. So I was looking at the torquer 2, but this is also my DD so I thought the 228 might work well.

224 is proven. I know that. But what's the difference in power levels here? What rpm do each peak at? Any big difference in driveability?
Old 03-20-2007, 06:01 AM
  #2  
Teching In
 
Z28EMUP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm having the 228R installed this Saturday, but originally I was gonna go with the 224. They both peak at 6300 rpm's, but the 224R starts at 1400. The 228R at 1600. I wanted to go big with like the MS3 but my car is my daily driver also. Ls1's are not big on low end torque thats also another reason I chose to go smaller. I can get back to you after my install on saturday and let you know exactly where it peaks.
Old 03-20-2007, 06:43 AM
  #3  
Launching!
iTrader: (13)
 
slammedchevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: fl
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i have the 228 and love it nice cam
Old 03-20-2007, 07:52 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
M6HTZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the 228R. I am very happy with it. I had the same concerns as you and decided to opt for the the 228 over a bigger cam or a 224.

The car drives great. The power is a marked improvement over the stock cam. I think you should go with the 228. With a good tune it drives great.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:10 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
Ryan02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lake Anna, VA/ Fairmont, WV
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There is going to be very little difference between the two. The 228R will make 5-10 more rwhp over the 224R, peak a tad higher and hold peak hp a tad longer. I would go for the 228R, with a good tune it should be very driveable.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:15 AM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Fedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

this may be slightly OT, but I went to the site and found this:

TSP XS Series Camshaft:
233/239, .595"/.603" 114* LSA (my choice)

any good for a future turbo car?
Old 03-20-2007, 08:18 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would go 228, I have a 232/236 on a 112 and it drives like stock until I hit half throttle. Its a perfect daily driver. The 228 will be a perfect daily driver cam.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:19 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (23)
 
brad8266's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 8,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fedge
this may be slightly OT, but I went to the site and found this:

TSP XS Series Camshaft:
233/239, .595"/.603" 114* LSA (my choice)

any good for a future turbo car?
Thats not an optimum cam for a turbo car due to overlap and reversion with a turbo. It would work ok with a blower though.
Old 03-20-2007, 08:36 AM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Fedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

thanks! maybe I'll just ProCharge that bad boy instead



Quick Reply: 224R vs 228R



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:39 PM.