Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Need input on PCV delete system...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #1  
2QUICK4U -WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
Default Need input on PCV delete system...

I'm experiencing lots of smoke during hard acceleration and small amounts of smoke during idling. I have all bolt-ons, full exhaust, MS4 cam swap with the 'all goody' package. The cam swap has only 5k miles so I don't think the valve stem seals are gone yet, but concidering the possibility.

Any input or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #2  
99TransAmLS16Spd's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Morris, IL
Default

Sounds like we have the same problem with a very similar setup.....
I highly doubt it's the seals, the shop that did my cam swap told me it was dumping smoke on the dyno. They suggested I may have a bad compression ring.....I'm not to sure if I buy into that or not. The engine is not fresh with 85k miles, but I would hope the rings lasted longer than that. I have never ran nitrous through it,messed with the rev limiter, or overrevved by putting it in the wrong gear since I have had the car the last 25k miles. But besides that point, I have a new set of heads I need to install, and have considered foing the ls6 pcv conversion. The only think I don't like about it is "some grinding to the block may be required..."
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 07:19 PM
  #3  
2QUICK4U -WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
Default

Originally Posted by 99TransAmLS16Spd
Sounds like we have the same problem with a very similar setup.....
I highly doubt it's the seals, the shop that did my cam swap told me it was dumping smoke on the dyno. They suggested I may have a bad compression ring.....I'm not to sure if I buy into that or not. The engine is not fresh with 85k miles, but I would hope the rings lasted longer than that. I have never ran nitrous through it,messed with the rev limiter, or overrevved by putting it in the wrong gear since I have had the car the last 25k miles. But besides that point, I have a new set of heads I need to install, and have considered foing the ls6 pcv conversion. The only think I don't like about it is "some grinding to the block may be required..."
I highly doubt that it is a compression ring because compression check and leak down test come out perfect!! I only have 60k on motor!! One thing if it were the rings then expect smoke all the time, especially when in the throttle!
But that is one reason i think the valve stem seals, but doesnt smoke on start up!?!?!
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 07:20 PM
  #4  
2QUICK4U -WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
Default

Originally Posted by 99TransAmLS16Spd
Sounds like we have the same problem with a very similar setup.....
I highly doubt it's the seals, the shop that did my cam swap told me it was dumping smoke on the dyno. They suggested I may have a bad compression ring.....I'm not to sure if I buy into that or not. The engine is not fresh with 85k miles, but I would hope the rings lasted longer than that. I have never ran nitrous through it,messed with the rev limiter, or overrevved by putting it in the wrong gear since I have had the car the last 25k miles. But besides that point, I have a new set of heads I need to install, and have considered foing the ls6 pcv conversion. The only think I don't like about it is "some grinding to the block may be required..."

Thanks for the help!!!!!
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 08:53 PM
  #5  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

slap a breather on that ho and change your oil every 3000 miles. No more oil consumption and no more ugly exhaust smoke.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #6  
black01_WS6's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, FL.
Default

well I only smoke at WOT, and it is bothering me. I don't know if I should try changing the heads, or just buy a new shortblock.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 12:43 AM
  #7  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

changing the heads to stop smoking? BREATHER.

That's like moving to a new house cuz yours is dirty lol.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 02:03 AM
  #8  
85ta383's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: moore OK
Default

agreed with above.. put a breather on the pass side. i ran a line with a pcv valve from the driver side to the pass side valve cover. stopped all my smokin!!

love that quote above
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 12:31 PM
  #9  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

I HAVE A BELIEEEEEEEEEEVA!!!!

Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 12:42 PM
  #10  
2QUICK4U -WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
Default

Okay, so you're telling me that I need to do the PCV delete system and if so, what parts do I need? Or do I just need to try a search?

Thanks for all the help.. I really appreciate it.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 01:08 PM
  #11  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iv-external-engine/691509-breathers-pcv-bypass-etc.html
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 07:53 PM
  #12  
2QUICK4U -WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
Default

Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
Thanks guys for all the help I really appreciate it!!!!
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #13  
2QUICK4U -WS6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere
Default

Which one would be more effective, using the breather or catch can method?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #14  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

Breathers will vent the fumes into the engine compartment which could give you an odor in the car. In addition they can be a little messy if not seperating oil and fumes. The catch can with the restricted line is suppose to eliminate the fumes. Breathers are a lot cheaper. The catch can with the breather seems to be a good design, dont have my car running right now I'm iun the middle of a h/c swap.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 PM.