98 ls1 vs newer years ?
Sorry, I should have been a little clearer. if u do not plan on turning the motor over the factory rev limit (6200) then u really should'nt worry! oh and NO factory ls6 intake had egr, My car is a 99 and the dumbshit before me blew it up with only 26k miles it now has a 01 brand new, even has 243 casting heads but still has the damn ls1 intake and egr.lol
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I've had no issues spinning mine to 6500rpm and have done quite a number of passes getting to that rpm (100+ this year alone), on top of the occasional redlining it (6500rpm for me) on the highway.
Keep on top of maintenance, regular oil changes and an oil analysis from time to time will let you know how things are on the inside.
I'm more worried about my 10 bolt these days...
so i wouldn't base my decision on this.
i would however think about the fact that the '98's have perimiter bolt valve covers vs newer year's center bolt (more common) style.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showpost....80&postcount=2
Negatives...
Weaker rod bolts than 99+ LS1 engines
Lower flowing LS1 intake(10-15hp) 97-00 cars
Lower flowing heads (5-7hp difference at best)
Lower flowing exhaust manifolds than 00+ LS1's(3-7hp difference)
Less effiecent oiling system, Not a horrible flaw but still not as efficent as 99+ cars
and a lovely EGR valve attached to our intake
98 PCM is completely different from 99+ LS1's
Positives are ...
Slightly larger cam than 99+ LS1's (5hp difference at best)
28lb injectors
Throttle body opens faster(not much faster but faster never the less)
This is all off the top of my head. The link posted above goes into greater detail
My car has 131000 and runs like a champ no overheating, oil issues, nothing just whooping *** on the street daily.
Yes the 98 was the worst head style , and had the bad oil pumps . But you will have the motor out just swap the pump .But for $3000 that sounds like a good deal for the whole car







