Lobe Separation Angle
112 LSA will have a lower torque curve than 114 LSA...
It makes no sense.
The General rule of thumb is the tighter the LSA the higher the torque peak is generally moved up.
Why does a 224/224 cam with 114 LSA peak at 6400 RPM and a T rex with 110 LSA 242/248 cam have a peak powerband of 7000 RPMs?
That already goes to show that the bigger cams generally tend to have atighter LSA..
I learned this in my cylinder head rebuilding class, and just to be certain in my engine overhaul / building class when we talked cams again, I asked my auto teacher to verify this. and again he said so... "tighter LSAs move the peak torque curve to higher RPMs.. and it makes sense compare any aftermarket cam and you will see from 114LSA - 110LSA, but the stock LS1 cam which peaks HP way sooner, has a much higher LSA.
So wtf am I missing here? Is everyone here have it backwards or does my professor, whole High Performance Auto program have it backwards? I think I am right, but I wanna figure out WTH is up with this once and for all. Can anyone with much knowledge explain to me the differences to me?
I can understand the operation of a camshaft, Im not new to the Technical world of Automotive, both hands on and reseaching, theory, learning high performance engines, chassis and drivetrain.
But I want someone(s) to come in and explain to me, why I am hearing this from LS1tech constantly.
Thanks.
However, Im pretty certain Ive been told the torque peak moves up a few times with a wider LSA and that is just wrong.
We put a Blower spec grind in a N/A motor for a LT1 350 with the expectation of the blower down the road. Welp it didnt happen and the person went from cutting 1.7 60 foots to putting down 1.9's and basically running the same ET even though he gained in MPH. The TQ converter and rear gear remained the same.
That cam make about 40 more hp over stock but since the curve got pushed forward he needed to match it to the converter and rear gear to take advantage of the new found power.
Had he gotten the same grind on a 112 he would have gained in ET as well.
Thats just personal exp and I am no wiz when it comes to valve timing events, ill leave that to Pred or PatG.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
TR224/224 112+4
TR224/224 114+4
The 114+4 will make more Peak HP, but the band is higher in rpm (about 200) and broader.
The 112+4 will make a bit more power under the curve, power starts sooner (about 200 rpm) but dips faster after peak, less peak HP.
So this is all related to VE (valve events), and not just LSA.
Sooo one needs to look at VEs and NOT just say X cam on 114 is less powerful than Y cam on 112 etc....
TR224/224 112+4
TR224/224 114+4
The 114+4 will make more Peak HP, but the band is higher in rpm (about 200) and broader.
The 112+4 will make a bit more power under the curve, power starts sooner (about 200 rpm) but dips faster after peak, less peak HP.
So this is all related to VE (valve events), and not just LSA.
Sooo one needs to look at VEs and NOT just say X cam on 114 is less powerful than Y cam on 112 etc....
so in that case, since Im a DD, Id rather have the 112 LSA.
stock LSA on an ls1/2/6 is something like 116-117 for what its worth.
stock LSA on an ls1/2/6 is something like 116-117 for what its worth.
duration at .050 was 266 int & 270 Ex . Cam lift .399 lift & .410 EX with a
rocker arm ratio of 2.1 int & ex.Valve lift was .837.9 intake & .861 EX .The person said it was used at Charlotte Motor Speedway.He said it had a rpm range of 6500 to 9500.There are a lot of NASCAR engine builders here and from asking around they have experimented with 100 LSA for brute low end TRQ to 115LSA for top end HP. Im no engine builder but learning all I can from ever one here.Hope that helps
stock LSA on an ls1/2/6 is something like 116-117 for what its worth.
i prefer a wider rpm range of torque and lose a few peak hp, than having a peaky cam only. of course only due to my car being a DD.







