Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stealth II cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #21  
Ragtop 99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 1
From: Bethesda, MD
Default

Originally Posted by 91_RS_LS1
I'll admit I don't know much about cam design, but I would think if one were running heads that had max flow at or above .600 lift that a cam with max lift at ~ .600 would make more power than a cam with .581 lift. Then again, it's only .020 of an inch
Peak lift is just one point on a continous distribution. The high lift cams typically have more duration at .200 and .400 lift so the area under the curve is greater than the same duration (.05 measured) cams with lower lifts. This is where the gains often come from.
...........

I would go with Predator's design or even his design on a 114 lobe. It will not require a very high idle to completely hide the lope.

The CheaTR is a nice cam, but optimized for stock manifolds. It will work, but again in this situation, reducing the LSA would make more power and accomplish the goal.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 10:38 AM
  #22  
91_RS_LS1's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Northeast TN
Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
Peak lift is just one point on a continous distribution. The high lift cams typically have more duration at .200 and .400 lift so the area under the curve is greater than the same duration (.05 measured) cams with lower lifts. This is where the gains often come from.
...........
Thanks for explaining that. I hadn't thought about the shape of the lobes.... but now that I think about it, it would make a huge difference in the peak power and power band.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #23  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by 91_RS_LS1
I'll admit I don't know much about cam design, but I would think if one were running heads that had max flow at or above .600 lift that a cam with max lift at ~ .600 would make more power than a cam with .581 lift. Then again, it's only .020 of an inch
Yes correct, but even with a head that only flows in the 275/280 cfm at .600 lift, you can benefit fron a bit higher lift. It will act like a crutch, and that is true untill the flow becomes turbulent. That is the point where more lift doesn't benefit anymore.
The other reason is the lobe rate at various lifts, .006/.050/.200/.400

That is why I do not agree with Zach's statement. And i've tested that various times in my cams
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #24  
chrs1313's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 13
Default

If you are going for a sleeper you should keep your manifolds and just get the cheatr cam or something close to that...with headers the cam lobe is magnified dramatically, much harder to hide...stock manifolds flow alot better than most people realize...with the stock cam and 3360 race weight and stock manifold and cats on the car i went a best of 11.72 at 115.4mph the da was -950 ft but on a 0 da da the car would run 11.90 all day...this was on stock manifolds and cats...just think if i had the cheatr cam...

if i were to go the sleeper route it would be ported and milled 241 heads with a cheatr cam or something close with stock manifolds...maybe even add a hidden 100 shot dry kit...you could run mid to high 10s with that setup...

and everyone would think you are just another stock head, stock cam, mild bolt-on car who doesn't even have headers yet...

fyi my qtp headers and ory added me around 12-15hp
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2007 | 08:00 PM
  #25  
Street Lethal's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: Old Bridge "Raceway Park" N.J.
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
But, lately I just used a 224/222 XFI/XE-R(actualy 225/223 once ground) and it made ~ 10 rwhp more cam only, so if you tailor the combo with the right valve events it will make more power.
Pred, how much time did you drop in the quarter mile with that custom Stealth cam in comparison w/the old one that you ran an 11.2 with. Also, since the original poster mentioned the tried and true TR224 camshaft, what improvements would you recommend with that grind as well....?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 01:21 AM
  #26  
BarneyMobile's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 789
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
If you are going for a sleeper you should keep your manifolds and just get the cheatr cam or something close to that...with headers the cam lobe is magnified dramatically, much harder to hide...stock manifolds flow alot better than most people realize...with the stock cam and 3360 race weight and stock manifold and cats on the car i went a best of 11.72 at 115.4mph the da was -950 ft but on a 0 da da the car would run 11.90 all day...this was on stock manifolds and cats...just think if i had the cheatr cam...

if i were to go the sleeper route it would be ported and milled 241 heads with a cheatr cam or something close with stock manifolds...maybe even add a hidden 100 shot dry kit...you could run mid to high 10s with that setup...

and everyone would think you are just another stock head, stock cam, mild bolt-on car who doesn't even have headers yet...

fyi my qtp headers and ory added me around 12-15hp

Well Im pretty much sold on getting the Stealth2. I thought the stealth2 with LT's would still idle like a stock motor with LT's as were theh cheatr cam would have alittle lope with headers. Im not looking for blistering track times, I just want a nice street car that drives and sounds like stock with bolt-ons but with more power.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 03:16 AM
  #27  
HotRodV6's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 2
From: Conroe, TX.
Default

Im looking for a cam for a stock 5.3 in my 03 Silverado, it will have LT's and a cat back, cold air intake and a wheatly or nelson tune, how well do you think the stealth cam would work for this combo?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 07:19 AM
  #28  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by BarneyMobile
Well Im pretty much sold on getting the Stealth2. I thought the stealth2 with LT's would still idle like a stock motor with LT's as were theh cheatr cam would have alittle lope with headers. Im not looking for blistering track times, I just want a nice street car that drives and sounds like stock with bolt-ons but with more power.
The stealth 2 with headers and catback is not like stock, more like a nervous rapid chopchop. Quiet compared to lopey cams thaugh. -10* overlap
The CheaTR is -13* overlap so technicaly quieter than the Stealth 2
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 09:25 AM
  #29  
Ragtop 99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 1
From: Bethesda, MD
Default

Originally Posted by BarneyMobile
I thought the stealth2 with LT's would still idle like a stock motor with LT's as were theh cheatr cam would have alittle lope with headers.
On what information, or lack thereof, did you reach that conclusion?

BTW, As someone else pointed out, if you want true stealth, skip the headers and go with a cam designed for stock manifolds. Most Headers are thinner and louder than manifolds.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 10:20 AM
  #30  
BarneyMobile's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 789
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Ragtop 99
On what information, or lack thereof, did you reach that conclusion?

BTW, As someone else pointed out, if you want true stealth, skip the headers and go with a cam designed for stock manifolds. Most Headers are thinner and louder than manifolds.
I was told this info when I called MTI, Im putting headers on regardless, so I based my desicion around this. I was told that the cheatr would have more of a noticable lope with headers than the stealth2 would. Since I'm putting headers on, wouldnt it seem like I would be better off with the stealth2 since the cheatr was designed to work with manifolds? I do have a really good tuner to tune my car so even then I would amagine the idle could be played with until it sounded stockish?
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 12:11 PM
  #31  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by BarneyMobile
I was told this info when I called MTI, Im putting headers on regardless, so I based my desicion around this. I was told that the cheatr would have more of a noticable lope with headers than the stealth2 would. Since I'm putting headers on, wouldnt it seem like I would be better off with the stealth2 since the cheatr was designed to work with manifolds? I do have a really good tuner to tune my car so even then I would amagine the idle could be played with until it sounded stockish?
Barney, READ post #28
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 02:05 PM
  #32  
chrs1313's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 13
Default

like already stated i have a stock cam and with headers and still stock exhaust with a cutout and people think i have a cam because it screams...

if you want a true sleeper go with the cheatr and stock manifolds...i dont know why you are so fixed on the headers it is really a waste of money if you are not looking to put a big cam in and you are trying for a sleeper and dont care about huge times...

u would be better off spending the money on ls6 intake...

curious to why you want headers so bad...if you want a stock sounding cam...

listen to predator he knows what he is talking about...
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #33  
BarneyMobile's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 789
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Default

Things seem to be getting alittle out of context here. I understand that it wont be 100% stock sounding with headers but I got an awsome deal on a set of use LT's from a friend, also I will be running a catted y. People seem to be getting off track here. Earlier in the thread I said which cam would make more power with headers and I said I want a car that sound like stock motor with bolt-ons, headers being one of them. If it has a tiny chop to it, I'll live with it, I just didnt want the crazy lope like most guys have. Im not new to cams, My LT1 has a 24x/24x on a 106LSA, and trust me that lopes extreamly hard and sounds like a 9 sec monster but it aint that fast. I dont want my SS to sound faster than it really is.

Heres a sound clip of the stealth series cam I pulled off of MTI's web site.
http://www.motorsporttech.com/media/..._idlesound.mpg

Heres another video of the stealth2
http://lsx.streetfire.net/search/ste...38d927ef8f.htm
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2007 | 08:33 PM
  #34  
RE AND CHERYL's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
From: Dover DE
Default

That second video sounds almost exactly like the set up in my sig below. I'm currently running mids with a Borla cat-back but will be switching to LT QTPs this winter when I install my ported 5.3 heads.

Don't worry about others telling you to run manifolds. I dosn't matter if your car is quiet with manifolds or louder with LTs. People are STILL going to under estimate what the car is capable of. I routinely whip up on Vettes all the time, most of them never saw it comming until it was too late. Most swear the cam is stock.

Re'
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 02:55 AM
  #35  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Then this is what I suggest after your new intput:

224/222 .604/.581 114+2 LSA
This is a custom grind XFI/XE-R
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2007 | 08:40 PM
  #36  
01 Red WS6's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,276
Likes: 1
From: Arlington TX
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Then this is what I suggest after your new intput:

224/222 .604/.581 114+2 LSA
This is a custom grind XFI/XE-R
How would the characteristics of this cam be compaired to the one you suggested on the 1st page?

224/220 .604/.581 115+2 LSA
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 04:34 AM
  #37  
RedsrtAk's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks AK
Default

Originally Posted by BarneyMobile
I called both TR and MTI about the CheaTR and the Stealth2. I've narrowed down my search to these 2 cams. Now my problem is which one? They both claim about 40rwhp gain with supporting mods which I will have. Maybe I'll just flip a coin, what you guys think?
I put down 399whp with patriot stage 2's/TR CheaTR...through a Th-400...good power is achieviable with either. The idle is subtle and not THAT notiable with my cutout closed.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 07:45 AM
  #38  
52172's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,489
Likes: 1
From: Buellton Ca
Default

Originally Posted by 01 Red WS6
How would the characteristics of this cam be compaired to the one you suggested on the 1st page?

224/220 .604/.581 115+2 LSA
You would barely be able to tell the difference between the two cams. The cam with the higher lobe separation would peak slightly later maybe 200 rpms thats all.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #39  
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 17
From: BFE
Default

Originally Posted by 52172
You would barely be able to tell the difference between the two cams. The cam with the higher lobe separation would peak slightly later maybe 200 rpms thats all.
A tad more overlap, a tad more DCR, a touch of more exhaust, all together a tiny bit more ponies under the curve.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #40  
SSpdDmon's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
From: Commerce Twp, MI
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Then this is what I suggest after your new intput:

224/222 .604/.581 114+2 LSA
This is a custom grind XFI/XE-R
Would this be considered a good cam for a Procharged application or is the intake lobe too aggressive?
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE