400+ cam only cars!!!
#24
#28
The easiest way to get your number would be to go to a happy dyno (or get your dyno graphed out in 'dyno-jet' conversion numbers on a superflow). I know that sounds flip, but my car dyno'd 25 rwhp different between two local mustang 1100's both using SAE correction.
With that in mind, I gained 57 rwhp & 45 rwtq (hp was still climbing but only graphed out to 6600, peak was about 6750), with a 224/228 111+0 .609/.588 XFI/XE-R. On the lower local dyno, I was at 412/380. Add 25 for the other dyno and it's 437/405.
Keep in mind that this is on an LS6, (stock 243 heads with the sodium valves blah blah), reving to 6900, with a ported Fast90 & UD Pulley.
Get a custom cam recomendation from Partick or Pred, to match up to your goals and current/future mods.
Results, video's way to in depth write-up here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/913123-224-228-cam-ud-balancer-results-57-rwhp-45-rwtq.html
-Chris
With that in mind, I gained 57 rwhp & 45 rwtq (hp was still climbing but only graphed out to 6600, peak was about 6750), with a 224/228 111+0 .609/.588 XFI/XE-R. On the lower local dyno, I was at 412/380. Add 25 for the other dyno and it's 437/405.
Keep in mind that this is on an LS6, (stock 243 heads with the sodium valves blah blah), reving to 6900, with a ported Fast90 & UD Pulley.
Get a custom cam recomendation from Partick or Pred, to match up to your goals and current/future mods.
Results, video's way to in depth write-up here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamometer-results-comparisons/913123-224-228-cam-ud-balancer-results-57-rwhp-45-rwtq.html
-Chris