dumped the never used tr230 for a...
#3
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've been running a 232/228 @ 108 for a couple of weeks now. I like it. I mean, I really like it!
I changed from a 224/224 @ 112. Nice, but too nice for an M6 with a non MAF tune.
I've got an engine dyno sheet with stock valved LS1 heads. Here
I changed from a 224/224 @ 112. Nice, but too nice for an M6 with a non MAF tune.
I've got an engine dyno sheet with stock valved LS1 heads. Here
#4
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: wilmington delaware
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
is that a 346 inch motor? thats about 470rwhp at 6500rpm <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> oops hehe. 470 crank hp is about what at the wheels? like 400 or so?
#5
I can shift faster than you.
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by hondakiller:
<strong> is that a 346 inch motor? thats about 470rwhp at 6500rpm <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">His is talking about flywheel hp, not rwhp. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> Notice he mentioned engine dyno and not a chasis dyno.
Still, not bad numbers in the least.
<strong> is that a 346 inch motor? thats about 470rwhp at 6500rpm <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">His is talking about flywheel hp, not rwhp. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> Notice he mentioned engine dyno and not a chasis dyno.
Still, not bad numbers in the least.
#7
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: las vegas, nev
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
well its in and its still running, so no clearance issues straight up. i NEED tuning for sure. pulling nice and hard up to the 6250 limiter
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by ROB'S SS:
<strong> well its in and its still running, so no clearance issues straight up. i NEED tuning for sure. pulling nice and hard up to the 6250 limiter </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Good stuff. On my simular cam with stock valves, I placed a 1/4" thick piece if plasticine on the piston and the stock valve didn't even touch. (miles away) and that was with no gasket.
BTW you should have a tune with any mod.....
I would. <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
<strong> well its in and its still running, so no clearance issues straight up. i NEED tuning for sure. pulling nice and hard up to the 6250 limiter </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Good stuff. On my simular cam with stock valves, I placed a 1/4" thick piece if plasticine on the piston and the stock valve didn't even touch. (miles away) and that was with no gasket.
BTW you should have a tune with any mod.....
I would. <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
#9
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's funny how when I was running the 232/226 .595/.584 lsa 110 cam I was getting much lip.. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> I ended up selling the cam and there is a happy customer in Houston right now. No one wanted to listen.. It was for sale for quite some time for $275 and now that person is going to be wearing some of you guys out on the street and at the track... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
#11
TECH Addict
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Plan B:
<strong> I've been running a 232/228 @ 108 for a couple of weeks now. I like it. I mean, I really like it!
I changed from a 224/224 @ 112. Nice, but too nice for an M6 with a non MAF tune.
I've got an engine dyno sheet with stock valved LS1 heads. Here </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">What flow were these stock valved heads? and how driveable is this cam? Looks like it is a dud below 4000, and where did power peak? It looks like it was still climbing at 6500.
<strong> I've been running a 232/228 @ 108 for a couple of weeks now. I like it. I mean, I really like it!
I changed from a 224/224 @ 112. Nice, but too nice for an M6 with a non MAF tune.
I've got an engine dyno sheet with stock valved LS1 heads. Here </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">What flow were these stock valved heads? and how driveable is this cam? Looks like it is a dud below 4000, and where did power peak? It looks like it was still climbing at 6500.
#13
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
LS1derfull,
Ramping started at 4k. It certainly isn't a dud below 4k as it has more down low than my last cam. At the final installed position, it stopped making power at 6,500. I've got some other graphs still in the dyno, I'll get them printed next week and send them to you.
I'm not sure what the heads flow at, not tested. Idle quality isn't too bad either. <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />
Ramping started at 4k. It certainly isn't a dud below 4k as it has more down low than my last cam. At the final installed position, it stopped making power at 6,500. I've got some other graphs still in the dyno, I'll get them printed next week and send them to you.
I'm not sure what the heads flow at, not tested. Idle quality isn't too bad either. <img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_cheers.gif" />