Check out this new style Intake manafold!
01-09-2009, 06:10 AM
#261
One result posted was from a GTO that showed big gains on a chassis dyno, another is someone tested it at the track one time and ran slower. There is no concrete data either way right now.
Ive seen cars pickup nothing with a fast 90 setup just bolting it on and running at the track without a dyno tune, then after getting on the dyno they saw solid gains.
Ive seen cars pickup nothing with a fast 90 setup just bolting it on and running at the track without a dyno tune, then after getting on the dyno they saw solid gains.
Also, the dyno test that was done on this thing that showed gains was done on a basically stock LS2 with L92 (raised port) heads and was against a stock L76 intake.
My comparison was on a 402 LS2 w/ cathedral port Mamo Ported AFR225's. My comparison was not against a stock intake or even an out of the box FAST. It was against a Mamo ported FAST90.
I will be talking to Vinny today in order to see what we can do. He is supposed to be doing a FAST vs FiberTuned test on Monday or Tuesday on the dyno. Let's see what that says.
In the mean time, I will be putting my FAST back on just to make sure that I dont have another problem somewhere else and this was just a coincidence. I will keep everyone posted on my Review thread in this section.
01-09-2009, 04:56 PM
#262
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This thread maybe?
Not a single dyno with a boosted application, claims that were far from backed up. I was and still am ready to buy, but they aren't seeing my money unless I see some gains.
There's more than enough of us boosted guys that are more than happy to test the product. The fact that they skipped that part worries me as a consumer.
Not a single dyno with a boosted application, claims that were far from backed up. I was and still am ready to buy, but they aren't seeing my money unless I see some gains.
There's more than enough of us boosted guys that are more than happy to test the product. The fact that they skipped that part worries me as a consumer.
12-21-2011, 08:16 AM
#268
i think they stopped making it cause it was found to make less power than a fast 92.
they two dyno runs that were known to exist on it one gained some HP but one lost a TON. but the only track proven times were a loss in power.
i thought they were going to re design a new one but never hears anything else about it
they two dyno runs that were known to exist on it one gained some HP but one lost a TON. but the only track proven times were a loss in power.
i thought they were going to re design a new one but never hears anything else about it
01-27-2013, 11:43 AM
#270
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 906
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bringing up a long dead thread....
I think this manifold was a good idea with tunable runners to bad it wasn't looked into more and test , but that all takes money.
I think this manifold was a good idea with tunable runners to bad it wasn't looked into more and test , but that all takes money.
