Check out this new style Intake manafold!
#142
10 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I cant remember exactly but it was close to 700hp and about 680tq. This was thru a FAST90 which peaked at 6800 RPM. We wont have engine dyno numbers but we expect to pick up 50+ from this intake if it will allow us to spin the motor another 1K RPM. It's a pretty beefy cam in there.
#143
On The Tree
iTrader: (15)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I dont know that on a forced induction application, it will make as much of a difference in terms of power. It's my understanding that the boosted cars dont have the intake stalling out limitations that us NA and nitrous guys have.
#149
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
After some research, I will need the ones with the longer runners. My application requires the low-end torque. I'm hoping the longer runner version does not raise the plentum too much as I have aluminum over part of the engine and I do not want to redo that.
Do you know the runner length they are going to make for the longer ones?
Here are some pics of what I must work around.
Ideas...
#152
10 Second Club
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here is a good question. Are the current runners, the length they are because that is as long as you could make them to still clear factory hoods? Or do you believe a longer set of runners will still clear factory hoods.
#156
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I hope not...